This New 1994 Could Have Been 1974

[davidswanson]

If the Democrats had used 2009 and 2010 to end the wars and prosecute Bush and Cheney, not to mention Wall Street, for their crimes; put prisoners on trial or free them; expose and hold accountable those behind the torture, warrantless spying, assassinations, and war lies; if they had thrown out the filibuster rule; restored the right to organize a union; created Medicare for All; and guaranteed a job to anyone in need through a new green energy program and huge investments in education, two things would have happened.

First, astroturfed corporate events would have denounced all of this as Socialism. How horrible THAT would have been! I can't imagine it!

Second, the Democrats would have accomplished things people could feel and appreciate in their lives, and the enthusiasm gap would have been on the other side.

When the Democrats threw out Richard Nixon and stood up for the rule of law, they won 49 House seats and 3 in the Senate. When the Republicans pretended Bill Clinton was a Socialist, they won 54 House seats and 8 in the Senate.

2010 is looking more like 1994 than 1974, and it didn't have to. That's why it's important that the Democrats not lose the seats of those among them who have been pointing in the right direction all along, chief among them Congressman Dennis Kucinich. If Congress had followed his lead, the wars would be over, and their architects impeached and prosecuted. Tax cuts for billionaires would be history, as would a large chunk of the military budget, not to mention corporate bailouts, and NAFTA. We'd all have jobs and homes and free healthcare, and that healthcare would cost less than what we pay now.

The Democrats can lose up to 38 seats, keep the majority, and be better off for the loss of the worst Democrats, as long as it's the worst ones that they lose. Whether they will use their committees to conduct oversight (such as by finding the nerve to subpoena BP's CEO)will be a question of some future spine implantation surgery. Whether they pass any good laws will depend on whether the Senate throws out the filibuster rule. But nothing good will happen if the best of the Democrats lose their elections.

So, here's an idea for the next few days: Help this campaign: http://kucinich.us

[jgraz]

1. Not just Kucinich... there's a lot of good Dems who need our help

http://www.russfeingold.org

http://www.graysonforcongress.com

http://www.perrielloforcongress.com

[kenfrequed]

3. Agreed

The GOP has attempted to swamp these progressives because they realize that they are in danger of losing narrative control if only the blue dogs get put down.

[McCamy Taylor]

2. 1974 GOP had the WH therefore automatic Dem pick ups in the midterms.

The election I think that you are thinking of is 1934---Dem in the WH and Dem pickups in the midterms. That was caused by the Great Depression.

[ProudDad]

4. Which we are in...

Except this Last Great Depression that began in 2008 is NOT affecting the rich, just the working classes...

And the Obamites have acted more like Hoover than FDR.

The REAL unemployment/underemployment rate today is approaching that of 1933 - about 25%.

FDR regulated the banks...

FDR bailed out working folk as well as the banksters (although he planted the seeds for the cancerous growth of capitalism with his "fiscal conservatism")...

FDR CUT the war budget instead of raising it to new heights...

Of course, Roosevelt, being an entitled, rich white man, didn't have the acute insecurity problem in the face of the bloody military and the economic witch doctors that Obama's bowing down to...

[davidswanson]

5. i suppose

but did 9 seats really shake the earth?

[Overseas]

6. K&R ! //nt