Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel's segment about Keith

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:25 PM
Original message
Rachel's segment about Keith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. excerpt-
Here's the larger point, though, that's going mysteriously missing from the right-wing cackling and old media cluck-cluck-clucking: I know everyone likes to say, "Oh, cable news, it's all the same. Fox and MSNBC -- mirror images of each other. But if you look at the long history of Fox hosts not just giving money to candidates, but actively endorsing campaigns and raising millions of dollars for politicians and political parties -- whether it's Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck or Mike Huckabee -- and you'll see that we can lay that old false equivalency to rest forever. There are multiple people being paid by Fox News to essentially run for office as Republican candidates. If you count not just their hosts but their contributors, you're looking at a significant portion of the entire Republican lineup of potential contenders for 2012.

They can do that because there's no rule against that at Fox. Their network is run as a political operation. Ours isn't. Yeah, Keith's a liberal, and so am I. But we're not a political operation -- Fox is. We're a news operation. The rules around here are part of how you know that.
===
Back before it was politically safe to do it, Keith Olbermann attracted the ire of the right-wing and a lot of others besides when he brought to light and raged against what he saw as the errors and sins of the previous presidential administration. Keith was also the one who brought to light Fox News's water-carrying for the Bush Administration; he was the one whose point-of-view journalism exposed and put exclamation points on the problems of disguising a political operation as a news one, the model embraced by the guys across Sixth Avenue, at Fox.

Now, weirdly, it is Keith who is once again illustrating the difference between what he does at MSNBC -- what we do here -- and what goes on across the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. i thought she was phenomenal
She supported Keith beautifully and gave him the praise he deserved as a genuine journalist while not making excuses or saying he'd been unfairly treated. And she got in some fantastic digs at Fox, too. I really thought she did a magnificent job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. A nice dig at false equivalency as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Dig? Hell, it was a total, comprehensive dismantling of that particular bit of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rachel did an awesome job explaining the entire thing
Hopefully that's the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. The best summary of why I watch her -she is honest, forthright and knowledgeable
And cuts through the white noise to what is important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. recommend -- there is no equivalency. and jon needs to issue a retraction. bring keith back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. didn't she original agree with Stewart's argument--now that Keith is suspended, it suddenly
strikes her that the false equivalence is wrong--ODD TIMING, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC