Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon's Inspector General says US soldiers going without!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:32 PM
Original message
Pentagon's Inspector General says US soldiers going without!
Without necessary weapons, armor, vehicles and equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan. What in the hell is wrong with these people. Damn, my son-in-law is in Afghanistan. Think Progress is reporting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was posted yesterday:
Report: U.S. Troops Short On Crucial Supplies


http://kutv.com/topstories/topstories_story_030170745.h...

Hundreds of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have experienced shortages of key protective equipment including armored vehicles, roadside-bomb countermeasures and communications gear, a Pentagon survey released Tuesday shows.

The Defense Department Inspector General's Office polled roughly 1,100 service members and found they weren't always adequately equipped for their missions. The troops were interviewed in Iraq and Afghanistan last May and June.

Those surveyed reported shortcoming with vehicles outfitted with armor; "crew-served weapons," which are weapons it takes more than one person to handle, such as artillery or a large machine gun; electronic countermeasure devices, such as equipment designed to foil roadside bombs by interfering with cell-phone signals that may be used to detonate them; and communications equipment.

The survey found that those not getting needed gear include troops performing untraditional missions such as training, reconstruction, detainee operations and explosive ordnance disposal.

In some cases, they went ahead with the work anyway, used informal means to get what they needed or canceled or put off operations while waiting for equipment, the report summary said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This seems to be perennial problem
My father was in WW2 and he has told me lots of stories about soldiers "stealing" or "horsetrading" what they needed from other units. I read someplace that George Washington's men had to supply their own weapons and ammo. The critical supplies are obviously different now but obviously the whole thing about supply shortages just never seems to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godless Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. This has been the case since the 1st year of the occupation.
As RummyDumDum observed, "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you wish you had"! What he forgot to mention is that you spend the Pentagon's money on fancy high-tech gizmos instead of equiping the "Army you have". For the richest country on the planet to send soldiers into battle without stellar arms and equipment is so outrageous that it ought to be illegal. It's nothing short of an outrage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes but those billions of dollars not going to support our soldiers can be sprinkled among
the Halliburtons of the world. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Web site list info on Iraq war profiteering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. OIG has been derelict in his duty to get to the bottom : WHY ?
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 08:13 PM by EVDebs
who appointed Thomas Gimble ?

Gimble's bio
http://www.dodig.osd.mil/BIOs/gimble_bio.html

and bio of predecessor Joseph Schmitz ("...a member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.")
http://www.defenselink.mil/bios/schmitz_bio.html

They can't account for 25% of what DOD already spends and NOW they're in full CYO mode !

""More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends. "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.

$2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.""

War on Waste
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. You go to wars of choice with the army have, not the one you might want...
Edited on Wed Jan-31-07 08:04 PM by Postman
They don't give a tinkers damn about the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who do you think Patton would be smacking nowadays ?
Neocons, OSP, end-runners of truthful intell, a certain former pair of Nixon and Reagan era pols, 'the crazies in the basement' (of the WH)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC