Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Folks start paying attention to the Korean Peninsula

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:03 AM
Original message
Folks start paying attention to the Korean Peninsula
We may actually see the resumption of hostilities. The war never ended... and if that happens it will be quite the crisis not just for the US, but to the Pacific Region at the very least.

Also realize that all the treaties could trigger a very ugly situation...

That is all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are we on the wrong side in Korea?
The SoKo government appears to be a RW capitalist money grubbing corporatist puppet!

Meanwhile, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea HONORS working men and women!

http://asiamatters.blogspot.com/2009/10/north-korean-constitution-april-2009.html

( snip )

Article 4. The sovereignty of the DPRK shall be vested in the working people, which include workers, farmers, soldiers, and working intellectuals. The working people shall exercise their sovereignty through their representative organs -- the Supreme People's Assembly and the local people's assemblies at all levels.

( snip )

Article 8. The social system of the DPRK is a man-centered social system whereby the working popular masses are the masters of everything, and everything in society serves the working popular masses. The state shall safeguard the interests of, and respect and protect the human rights of the working people, including workers, farmers, soldiers, and working intellectuals, who have been freed from exploitation and oppression and have become the masters of the state and society.

( snip )

Article 17. Independence, peace, and friendship are the basic ideas of the DPRK's foreign policy and the principles of its external activities. The state shall establish diplomatic and political, economic, and cultural relations with all the countries that treat our country in a friendly manner, on the principles of complete equality and independence, mutual respect and noninterference in each other's internal affairs, and reciprocity. The state shall unite with the peoples of the world who espouse independence and shall actively support and encourage the struggle of the peoples of all countries to oppose all forms of aggression and interference in others' internal affairs and to achieve the sovereignty of their countries and national and class liberation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you're kidding right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. This is a joke right?
??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. You are kidding right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Sweet Jeebus! Are you kidding!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. May be, but I'll take capitalist hell over North Korean heaven any day.
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
28. I'm not saying North Korea is Heaven
Especially after years and years of attack and oppression from the capitalists!

But their constitution is an amazing piece of work in defining and protecting socialist workers' rights!

More from the Constitution of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea:

------------------------------

( snip )

Article 47. The state shall educate all students free of charge and give scholarships to students of universities and technical schools.

( snip )

Article 56. The state shall consolidate and develop the system of universal free medical care and strengthen the district-doctor system and the preventive medicine system to protect the lives of people and improve the health of the working people.

Article 57. The state shall draw up environmental protection measures before production, preserve and develop the natural environment, and prevent environmental pollution, thus providing the people with a modern and hygienic living environment and working conditions.

( snip )

------------------------------

Aren't these the exact things that progressives in the west are fighting for?

Again, it's not perfect, but look what they have been struggling against! American imperialism, saboteurs, counter-revolutionaries, Moonies, etc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. I will say this again Phil
but the SOVIET constitution, which this is based on, was also a wonder... in paper.

The problem is not that in theory is a bad one... but that it has never been implemented. And you can blame the Capitalists for all you want but it is not.

People starve in the DPKR.

Yes "socialism" works... but it does in a mixed economy... where there are heavy regulations and things like living wages and all that. I suggest you read Adam Smith, who got it... not those who claim to know the holy book but never read it. In fact Consumerism is not Capitalism nor is our emphasis on Monopolies,

But hey, whatever, given the RECORD you are going to get few people listening to you. Like the Soviet Constitution this one hits all the right points. It don't deliver. It is a piece of paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. People starve in the DPKR.
They do in the US too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Not to that extent
we could, but we are not talking of millions dying from starvation.

And with all the failures of the US (and it could get really bad here soon)... we are nowhere to the levels of the DPKR... if you think we are... then we will have to disagree, LOUDLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. 1992-1998 is not now. N Korea is not prosperous, but we should probably face the fact...
that North Korea has pretty much weathered the immediate fallout of the end of being a client state (with a massive economic drop) and now is stable enough to be more assertive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Now we are talking about a nuclear armed rogue power
And perhaps I don't remember this correctly but there were a lot of efforts to engage them. Hell we even sent RICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. They probably would have appreciated it more 16 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. We did, that is my point
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_famine

International response

Initial assistance to North Korea started as early as 1990, with small-scale support from religious groups in South Korea and assistance from the United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF).<11> In August 1995, North Korea made an official request for humanitarian aid and the international community responded accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #55
75. for the last 18 years the NK MO
has been to act up then we pay them off. More then likely the sinking of the SK warship and this recent arty attack is to get another pay off from the Western nations, and strangely enough China as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #51
85. Didn't he Kim Jong Il give all that rice to his army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #46
73. No, they're still woefully short of food
U.N. says North Korea food problems remain pressing

BEIJING | Thu Nov 4, 2010 6:53am EDT

BEIJING (Reuters) - Large numbers of children in impoverished and isolated North Korea are suffering from malnutrition and food aid to the communist state is insufficient, a senior U.N. official said on Thursday.

"I saw a lot of children already losing the battle against malnutrition," Josette Sheeran, executive director of the U.N.'s World Food Program (WFP), told reporters in Beijing after returning from Pyongyang.

"Their bodies and minds are stunted and so we really feel the need there ... We want to make sure we reach the most vulnerable children," she added.
...
Up to 6.2 million out of North Korea's current population of 23 million need food aid, the WFP said in March, adding that they were only able to reach 1.5 million, mainly young children and women, due to lack of funds.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6A327L20101104


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
76. North Korea is Best Korea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
86. Yeah, because constitutions in that kind of state mean something
Anyone who lived in the Soviet Union can tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. South Korean government was quite strange until the mid-80s
Strangely enough the bulk of the ethnic Korean community in Japan supported Kim Il Sung and only started shifting to support of the South in the late 1970s. Even now, 1/3 of the Korean community in Japan is aligned with the DPRK. I don't quite know why though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
43. Community
That's all. Their grandparents and such felt that way, so they do too. I heard most of them supported the North in the World cup for that reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. That is quite a constitution. Too bad most North Koreans can't feed their families or
read english. I bet they would be very entertained by that document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
87. I imagine the government there probably finds it entertaining, too
"LOL, the proletariat actually thinks we'll grant them rights!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
54. Go see for yourself...they'll be glad to have you.
As for SK being "right wing," you're just wrong, and dangerously close to being full of shit.

There are unions all over the place in SK, and they are powerful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #54
65. "CLOSE" to being full of shit?
Nah, this guy is made of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. Wow. Lil' Kim is as whacked out as any world leader
since b*sh. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
82. That is why we love them. Birds of a feather and all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. How do you think I feel? I'm in fallout range
It's messed up here right now. So tense in Beijing. I follow news very religiously, but for the first time I'm noticing everyone else is too. People I know who usually couldn't care less about this kind of shit are popping up all over MSN saying "Holy shit, what's gonna happen."

I've told my GF to prepare her Canadian Visa so it can be processed if things get uncomfortable here. Though, if a bomb is dropped, we'll probably try to head to western China as fast as possible. I'm not worried about China getting involved, but I KNOW there will be a distinct difference in my life should this happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Don't worry there are reasons why I also personally worry
this goes hot and it will not be pretty anywhere.

And the BBC analyst today said something that worried me for the first time. You see apparently Beijing has little control of Pyonyang. I pay attention and that is the first time I heard that, as far as I remember. Beijing has always had good control of it's client state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I tried telling people yesterday
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 01:24 AM by HEyHEY
That North Korea and China aren't as good as friends as people think. But was shouted down by know-it-alls. If China had control, we wouldn't be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I have been following this for a while
so I know relations have soured for the last oh what ten years.... just didn't realize to what extent.

I worry because if this goes hot... all interlinking alliances will be triggered worst case... a guns of august scenario...

Personally I expect hubby to be recalled so fast it is not even funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. I don't imagine he will be
I think that this war will be over faster than people think, if there is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. If there is a battle-group sunk
and all that, yes, yes he will. Also realize the 25K troops will make Americans howl in ways that you haven't heard them howl.

And casualties, let's talk worst case, if nukes go off, are in about 20 million directly from the initial exchange. (Assuming it stays low)

Gives me absolutely no joy...

Take care, and hopefully cooler heads will prevail.

(And of course I am worst casing this... hopefully like other times it will just get there and back down)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
90. Indeed
This madness has nothing to do with China. This is a small by State playing with very big boy weapons. North Korea is an "ally" only because they are on the border of China and NATO was on its very territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Difficult to tell if this is change of command posturing on both sides-
The fact that the defense minister for South Korea stepped down, as well as the aggressive posturing of the North Koreans seems to me to indicate that much of this might indicate a potential change of hierarchy due to the transfer of power in North Korea.
There's a lot of delicate "face" activity going on here, sort of a dance of dominance moves to prove that there is no "weakness" to exploit on either side with these changes.
What worries me is that there are subtle indications that China seems inclined to cut North Korea loose, and that would be like handing a hyper-active tweener the manual key to a CWIS gun system where the interlock systems have been disabled.
(CWIS is a ship-based enclosed gatling gun on a rotating platform that spits out 1000 5-inch rounds a minute for about five minutes to cut down an incoming missile before it hits the ship)
If we're lucky, it will end up being a lot of sound and fury, but no real action.

The cynical historian in me notes that as there is (and always has been) a pretty serious caste structure and some corruption in South Korea, so long as it's only fishing towns and farms that have sporadically been hit by artillery that could be seen as being North Korean face-saving activity, the government will complain but not do much more than strengthen borders and do as little as possible for political expediency.

However, if North Korea initiates military activity without being able to point at South Korean military movements as justification, then the war will escalate to hot really quick.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Here is the problem
as I told Hey Hey above. Today the BBC analyst said something that really perked my attention. Beijing don't have good control of it's client state.

Now this is the first time I hear that in such an obvious way. We know they've soured, but this is the worst apparently.

And it is all the interlocking alliances at play here.

China and Russia have to come to the aid of NK. we to South Korea with about 25 other nations going all the way back to... armistice.

It is that interlocking of alliances that could make this very nasty very fast. And it is partly the transfer of power in the north.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I saw that myself. If China or Russia isn't willing to pull NK into the 21st cent.,
This is a classic client state abandonment situation. North Korea, for all it's bluster, is still way too dependant on the former Communist countries (I don't consider China Communist in anything but name anymore) to stand on it's own.
When Kim-Jong-Il steps down or dies, there will be a power vacuum. And unless the son is strong enough to and savvy enough to step up with a plan the generals can live with, or unless a stronger nation (China or Russia- or even South Korea, if they can get the stick out of their asses and forgo face-saving militarism for a true reconciliation)will back the son as figurehead, that country will collapse into chaos.
And probably take South Korea with it.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Yep, Cuba comes to mind
though sans nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. What does NK gain by having a war wirh SK?
If we understand that question, we can figure out how to resolve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. As the same analyst put it
NK has all to gain. in power etcetera, as well as factories and people, while SK has all to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. Nope.
I see no upside if NK goes hot with SK....China won'r help them and they don't stand a chance against SK assets. It would be a very stupid play on their part to escalate the conflict. They lose, big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #32
50. It's Asia.... face
It's all about face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
71. Yep n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
105. How would they gain factories and people?
Sounds more like a Great Dane chasing and "gaining' control of a Smart Car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyKent Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kim Jong il is dying, that's all.
And his successor is taking over. So most of this is to 'show strength' to the home audience so a coup isn't even thought of.

In the meantime it would be helpful if S Korea and the US stopped poking N Korea with a stick all the time. It's deliberate baiting of a paranoid, trigger-happy Kim, and there's no point to it since he'll be gone shortly.

However there will be no war, it's just noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. Kim-Ill-Un is totally westernized.
He's got a western (Swiss) education. He's not his father. yet he's now head of the militrary. I doubt anyone really knows how this will play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyKent Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. As it usually does.
A lot of sound and fury signifying nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
78. Agreed
Some people just like to do the whole "Folks, this thing is going way baaaaaad..." routine.

A piffle. Sucks for the South Korean civilians and military in harm's way the other day, but that's about all that's gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. He also attended English schools
indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
89. I've heard him described as "just like" his father a few times too often
Going to college in Switzerland and "totally westernized" aren't exactly synonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
45. Hope you're right about the no war part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
57. He may well be dying, but I see no motivation for SK and the US
to provoke NK...do you? There's no upside for either country, IMHO. Now I can see China having a geo-political interest and they could use NK as a proxy state to screw up our strategic plan for the region. What I wonder is how much are we willing to gamble in our commitment to SK? Can or should we commit troops and USD to neutralize China's growing influence in their region? I really don't think we can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And like the Soviets the elite lives well
while the people starve. Do some readying... they were not dying from starvation a few years back just because....

Constitutions are wonderful documents that many a times are plainly ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
52. They died from famine, right?
And the capitalist and Moonies refused to send aid, or put such horrid conditions on it, there was no way for Kim Jong Il to accept while remaining true to the Juche idea!

They refuse to be American puppets, so we have continuously tried (and failed) to destroy them! But we have succeeded in holding them back economically!

Thus, the people suffer, not from the actions of the WPK, but from the actions of the foreign and South Korean capitalists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. WOW. Lil' Kim must have some appeal for you.....
seriously - WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #52
68. Um, they INSIST ON AID
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 02:54 AM by HEyHEY
They last threatened to blow up South Korea for not sending it.. jeez man get a god damn clue.

Are they supposed to be allowed "mug" other countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #52
72. Not sure I'd want to live there.
I think NK may be the last state that still supports a socialistic society. I suspect most people in NK have a pretty good idea of what kind of living standards SK, China, and Japan have and they might want the same opportunity for themselves. I don't get what NK gains from ratcheting up tensions with SK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #52
79. I hear Kim Jong Il likes to lurk on the Internet and provide commentary at sites like DU.
Is that you Jong?

How are things in the DPRK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Dear Fucking God! Do you know anything about North Korea!?
If there could be a more perfect example of an exploited and oppressed people I sure as hell can't think of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. I know, eh? It's basically Cambodia in the 70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Cambodia today is significantly poorer than North Korea.
I'm not saying N Korea is a paradise, but with per capita GDP of $1200 vs Cambodia's $800 things could be worse. In fact things were worse in the 1990s when they were first adjusting to no longer receiving soviet aid. If there was a time to try to engage with North Korea, that was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Well, I was refering to the tourture and such
However the distribution of wealth in Cambodia is much better than North Korea and they don't have the lack of food and other such problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Distribution of wealth is less equal in Cambodia. Gini 43, N Korea is 31
There is lack of food for many poor people there. But there is no political agenda that is served by pointing out that there is starvation in Cambodia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Dude
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 02:28 AM by HEyHEY
We're talking millions thought to have starved in North Korea a few years back. If there was such an epidemic in Cambodia, we'd of heard about it. Also, how can you ever get a correct GDP reading on North KOrea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. Dude
Millions of people starve in third world countries every years. Nobody says peep. Millions of Russians died (often freezing in apartments) due to free market reforms and nobody gives a shit. Millions of people are starving in parts of India and China as we speak. It's business as usual, and it only becomes news if it serves someone's agenda. The reason we know about the North Korean famine of the 90s is that a hostile state that had lost its client state status is of interest to our ruling class. Meanwhile in Ukraine at the same time the standard of living declines by 50% (and you're kidding yourself if you don't think this kills a shitload of people who are barely scraping by and pensioners) and nobody says peep because they're "free" now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. I do agree. However, if someplace lost 1/3 of it's population....
No matter where, it'd be a pretty big deal. China claims to have it's food issues under control now, though. Not sure how reliable that is however.

North Korea got hit so suddenly and so bad that hillsides can be seen from the air completely scorched from people digging for grass and rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phil The Cat Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
63. Let's start right here in America
Tens of millions of people homeless, starving, dying of ailments they cannot afford to have treated!

The DPRK provides free education and health care, and guarantees a job!

The profits of their enterprises are owned by the people, for their welfare and defense! They are not given to a few rich bloated RW stockholders!

If we would quit fighting them and start cooperating with them, the everyday lives of their citizens would be enhanced! Instead, we keep them in this fearful position, so they have to spend more than they should have to on the military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. Man o man
"They are not given to a few rich bloated RW stockholders!"

Um, YES THEY ARE... the elite in the Communist party. Just cause it's written doesn't make it so. Jesus Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #63
67. Dude...what?
Places like North Korea are what give socialism a terrible, terrible name. Just because their Constitution says it, doesn't mean that's how they work.

Please...PLEASE pull your head out of your ass. Or just tell us you're joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeJoe Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #63
77. Simple rule of thumb...
Countries that don't allow for free press and don't let their citizens leave are bad places. Paradises have trouble keeping people out, not in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #63
84. Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha!
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 05:28 PM by woo me with science
Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha! Hahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! Haha!

Seriously. Oh my god.

:rofl: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #63
88. I'm trying to decide between being impressed, depressed and terrified that you actually buy that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #88
96. Buy? Or sell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #63
95. I may be a Commie Pinko Dirtbag, but at least I'm not a Commie Pinko Nutcase. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. You are being sarcastic, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xor Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
92. I'm not buying what he's selling...
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 02:01 AM by xor
Sounds like a standard run of the mill wind up. Then again, he may just be taking a break from revleft, in which case he probably truly feels that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
42. That's crap. I don't know any North Koreans, but they know what's going on in South Korea, China,
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 02:17 AM by Old and In the Way
and the world, in general. Life sucks in NK...I'm pretty sure the general population wiil not be willing to die for a social construct that suffocates them. If given the opportunity, they're headed South and West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Many of them don't know, it's spooky
Information is so tightly controlled there. I'm sure they have a general idea that something is not right, but I don't think they realize how wrong it all really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. Do you live in Northern or Southern China?
I'd imagine things are a lot more unsettled in Ningbo and above.... :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. Beijing
It's NOT cool right now. I have to come up with a plan in case of war. We're right across from the crosshairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #66
74. Best of luck!
I really don't believe China is going to let NK screw things up in the region. They may be playing mindgames with the US, but ultimately, there is no good reason for China to let NK dictate the immediate future in the region. Frankly, I see NK as a new region to exploit for low labor costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
56. om nom nom nom
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 02:44 AM by NuclearDem
tasty tasty poeslaw

Of course, if you're being serious...dear God, really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
69. Don't believe everything you read
Totalitarian regimes always have egalitarian constitutions--because they are complete fictions. They assert "rights" of the people that in reality are suppressed by the raw power of the state. As for that impressive per capita earnings--after taking care of the elites that keep the rulers in power, the people don't get enough to even be able to spell 'per capita.'

Orwell had it right. In states like North Korea, "some animals are more equal than others"--no matter what the "Constitution" says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
70. Read this
www.northkoreanrefugees.com/2007-09-atbirth.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
81. a self-supporting national economy, means of production are owned by the state and social coops
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 05:05 PM by Catherina
No wonder we hate them with such fury.

Stick around. Your posts are a refreshing change from the talking points of the for-profit crowd pushes on the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #81
94. North Korea's economy's self-supporting? Can I have some of whatever you're smoking? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. Sounds of artillery fire heard off South Korea's Yeonpyeong island - Reuters witness
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 01:38 AM by Hissyspit
Reuters Twitter Feed 1:32 a.m.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Nothing on CNN and not yet on BBC
Will try Reuters next
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. here
http://www.reuters.com/news/world

BREAKING NEWS:
South Korea military says no artillery fired at Yeonpyeong island; says artillery fire appears to be within North Korean territory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
33. Might be a good time for history-ignorant Americans to actaully read a book or two about it as well.
Merely "paying attention to" something isn't enough unless one actually has a f*cking clue which most Americans (that includes DU'ers) clearly do not.

I would recommend respected historian Edwin Hoyt's basic trilogy on the Korean conflict - The Pusan Perimeter, On to the Yalu and The Bloody Road to Panmunjom. These books are basics. They are perennial Military Book of the Month selections so there's nothing controversial about them.

The first fifty pages of the third entry are particularily interesting because they detail the reasons China became involved. But then again, Americans seem to love to wallow in ignorance, fantasy and delusions especially when it comes to their military and foreign policy so maybe its best the fragile-minded leave these tomes uncracked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Americans don't know about last week
you expect them to know about fifty years ago?

I mean this about paying attention in a very important sense, leave the provincialism for the day.

Suffice it to say if this goes hot it will be guns of august worthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
80. People should have paid attention a long time ago.
Now that Kim Jong II is sick and passing things over to his son, I wonder what the changing of the guard actually means.

Frankly, I hope that things can be solved diplomatically because we can afford a war with all the outsourcing that is going on in the manufacture of defense products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
83. if pictures say a thousand words
this says it all:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
91. Holy fuck, where did all the NK apologists come from?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. Cui bono?
Who benefits from the existence of pro-NK posts in a high profile liberal forum?

I'm not stating it's so, only saying it's plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #97
99. I'm more willing to believe stupendous levels of naivete first
Given the Manichean mindsets around here I can certainly believe "the system we've got sucks, therefore one our government dislikes must be just great!" as a thought process in situations like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #99
100. And then there's a third option.
NK-paid astroturf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #99
101. Maoists stuck in 1968, probably
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Or 1952 at that
I've known a few self-described Stalinists who thought the guy was a misunderstood saint and that everything bad about him was capitalist propaganda and the like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. You must be joking!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #104
106. Alas, I am not
I thought one of them was at first, but nope. He also buys the North Korean propaganda hook, line and sinker; only person I've known who reads KCNA for anything other than laughs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
93. On the other hand, this will mean a lot of business for the USA War Machine
Since our country mainly runs on oil and making killing machines, we'll likely come out of the recession, and everything will be great! (except for all those folks who'll get slaughtered, but of course, that won't happen to us. ;) )



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
98. Keep an eye on Chinese forces as well.
Wouldn't conflict on the Korean peninisula make a great smokescreen for the Chinese invasion of Taiwan?

I really think Beijing and Pyongyang are up to something here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #98
103. Yes. Perfect isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC