Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators reassured about Cuba policy; spending bill vote expected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:01 PM
Original message
Senators reassured about Cuba policy; spending bill vote expected
Posted on Tuesday, 03.10.09
Senators reassured about Cuba policy; spending bill vote expected

BY LESLEY CLARK
lclark@MiamiHerald.com

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Treasury Department has promised opponents of changes to U.S.-Cuba policy tucked into a giant spending bill that some of the most controversial provisions will result in little change.

The U.S. Senate is expected to vote Tuesday on a $410 billion spending bill that contains provisions that make trade and travel to Cuba easier. The bill offers a general travel license for Americans selling agricultural products to Cuba, lets Cuba pay for goods on arrival and defunds enforcement of family travel restrictions enacted by former President George W. Bush.

Florida senators had vowed to block the bill. But in a letter to Sens. Bill Nelson of Florida and Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the provision that would grant a general license for agricultural producers to travel to Cuba would be limited to ``only a narrow class of businesses.''

''Any business using the general license would be required to provide both advance written notice outlining the purpose and scope of the planned travel and, upon return, a report outlining the activities conducted,'' Geithner wrote.

The assurances from Treasury are likely to pave the way toward passage of the $410 billion spending bill that was blocked last week by Nelson, Menendez and other senators opposed to the scope of spending in the bill.

A spokesman for Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., who worked with Menendez to rally opposition to the Cuba changes said Tuesday, ``It appears Treasury is addressing the most egregious of these provisions, fixing the problem.''

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking-news/story/942403.html



Senators Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez (Republican, Cuban
"exile" and former head of housing for George W. Bush. )

http://i264.photobucket.com.nyud.net:8090/albums/ii186/DutchPhil/MARTINEZWH.jpg

Mel Martinez and George W. Bush

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. This comes from the Miami Sewer so maybe it deserves a pillar of salt.
I hope so. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like a bit of face-saving for the Miami mafia...but who knows?
"It appears Treasury is addressing the most egregious of these provisions, fixing the problem." --a spokesman for Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., who worked with Menendez to rally opposition to the Cuba changes said Tuesday...

Or, the "fix" is in. Hard to know which.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. You won't believe this image I just stumbled across. You want to be sitting down.
http://upload.wikimedia.org.nyud.net:8090/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/John_C._Breckinridge_grave.jpg/800px-John_C._Breckinridge_grave.jpg

Gravestone of John C. Breckenridge
Undersecretary of War for


Here's what he wrote, in his "Breckenridge Memorandum," 12-24-1897:
"We must destroy everything within our cannons' range of fire. We must
impose a harsh blockade so that hunger and ... disease undermine the
peaceful population and decimate the Cuban army...

"To sum up, our policy must always be to support the weaker against the
stronger, until we have obtained the extermination of them both, in order
to annexe the Pearl of the Antilles", wrote US Secretary of War
Breckenridge on Christmas Eve, 1897.More:
http://www.cpa.org.au/garchive/940cuba.htm

His Wikipedia:
John Cabell Breckinridge (January 16, 1821 – May 17, 1875) was a lawyer, U.S. Representative, Senator from Kentucky, the 14th Vice President of the United States, Southern Democratic candidate for President in 1860, a Confederate general in the American Civil War, and the last Confederate Secretary of War. To date, Breckinridge is the youngest vice president in U.S. history, inaugurated at age 36. He is also remembered as the Confederate commander at the Battle of New Market, where young VMI cadets participated in the battle on the Confederate side. He was the grandson of U.S. Senator and Attorney General John Breckinridge and the father of congressman and diplomat Clifton Rodes Breckinridge. His great-grandson, John Cabell "Bunny" Breckinridge, was an actor.

~snip~
Breckinridge was an unsuccessful candidate for President in 1860, nominated by the Southern faction of the split Democratic Party and supported by the incumbent Democratic President, Buchanan. Far from expectant of victory, Breckinridge understood the long odds his success would necessitate. In a letter to Varina Davis he bemoaned "I trust I have the courage to lead a forlorn hope". In a four-way contest, he came in third in the popular vote, with 18.1%, but second in the Electoral College, winning the states of the Deep South, plus Delaware and Maryland. Breckinridge won the South with his pro-slavery platform, but was unable to win solid majorities in the border states, where Stephen Douglas, the Northern Democratic candidate, or the Constitutional Union Party was able to prevail in some cases. His native Kentucky went for John Bell, the Constitutional Union candidate. In most of the North, Breckinridge received almost no support, but as the candidate of the Buchanan faction he outpolled Douglas in Pennsylvania and won Delaware, and received some support comparable to Douglas in Connecticut. Republican Abraham Lincoln ultimately won the election with Breckinridge in second place. The race put Breckinridge at odds with his uncle, Robert Jefferson Breckinridge, who had supported Lincoln.

He was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1860 from Kentucky and served from March 4, 1861, until expelled by resolution of December 4, 1861, for support of the South. Fearing arrest, he fled to the Confederacy. Unlike other Confederate leaders, such as Robert E. Lee, who claimed obeisance to the will of their states, Breckinridge broke with his state after the Kentucky legislature voted to stay in the Union.

~snip~
Breckinridge feared that he would be put on trial for treason by the United States government and resolved to flee the country. He and a small band sailed from Florida in a tiny boat to reach safety in Cuba. He continued to the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United Kingdom again. He returned to Lexington, Kentucky, in March 1869 after being granted amnesty, and resumed the practice of law. While turning down suggestions that he become active in politics again, he spoke out strongly against the Ku Klux Klan. He became vice president of the Elizabethtown, Lexington, and Big Sandy Railroad Company. He died in Lexington of complications from cirrhosis<1> and was interred in Lexington Cemetery.

Breckinridge had ample reason to fear charges of treason. In 1863, premature rumors of his death prompted the New York Times to print what is perhaps the most vituperative obituary ever written about a nationally elected American official.<2>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Breckinridge

He was U.S. President William McKinley's Undersecretary of War, and during the Civil War, he was the Secretary of War for Jefferson Davis.

This guy was instrumental in forming our modern Cuba policy. Amazing, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ummm....he died in 1875 wrong again
Edited on Wed Mar-11-09 03:24 PM by Bacchus39
this is one for the ages:

"He was U.S. President William McKinley's Undersecretary of War, and during the Civil War, he was the Secretary of War for Jefferson Davis."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He must have ghostwritten his "Breckenridge Memorandum" then, in 1897.
Edited on Wed Mar-11-09 06:57 PM by Judi Lynn
The Breckenridge Memorandum

J.C. Breckenridge, U.S. Undersecretary of War in 1897, sent the following memo to the Commander of the U.S. Army, Lieutenant General Nelson A. Miles. The memo explains what is to be U.S. policy towards the Hawaiian islands, Puerto Rico and Cuba.

Department of War
Office of the Undersecretary
Washington D.C.

December 24, 1897

This department, in accordance with the departments of foreign trade and the Navy, feels obligated to complete the instructions on the military organization of the upcoming campaign in the Antilles with certain observations on the political mission that will fall to you as general in charge of our troops. Until now the annexation of territories to our Republic has been that of vast, sparsely populated regions, and such annexation has always been preceded by our immigrants’ peaceful settlement, so the absorption of the existing population has been simple and swift.

In relation to the Hawaiian Islands, the problem is more complex and dangerous, given the diversity of races and the fact that the Japanese interests there are on the same footing as ours. But taking into account their meager population, our flow of immigrants will render those problems illusory.

The Antillean problem has two aspects: one related to the island of Cuba and the other to Puerto Rico; as well, our aspirations and policies differ in each case.

Puerto Rico is a very fertile island, strategically located to the extreme east of the Antilles, and within reach for the nation that possesses it to rule over the most important communications route in the Gulf of Mexico, the day (which will not tarry, thanks to us) the opening is made in the Isthmus of Darien. This acquisition which we must make and preserve will be easy for us, because in my mind they have more to gain than to lose by changing their sovereignty since the interest there are more cosmopolitan than peninsular.

Conquest will only require relatively mild measures. Our occupation of the territory must be carried out with extreme care and respect for all the laws between civilized and Christian nations, only resorting in extreme cases to bombing certain of their strongholds.

In order to avoid conflict, the landing troops will take advantage of uninhabited points on the southern coast. Peace loving inhabitants will be rigorously respected, as will their properties.

I particularly recommend that you try to gain the sympathy of the colored race with the double objective of first obtaining its support for the annexation plebiscite, and second, furthering the main motive and goal of the U.S. expansion in the Antilles, which is to efficiently and rapidly solve our internal race conflict, a conflict which is escalating daily due to the growth of the black population. Given the well-known advantages that exist for them in the western islands, there is no doubt that once these fall into our hands they will be flooded by an overflow of black immigrants.

The island of Cuba, a larger territory, has a greater population density than Puerto Rico, although it is unevenly distributed. This population is made up of whites, blacks, Asians and people who are a mixture of these races. The inhabitants are generally indolent and apathetic. As for their learning, they range from the most refined to the most vulgar and abject. Its people are indifferent to religion, and the majority are therefore immoral and simultaneously they have strong passions and are very sensual. Since they only possess a vague notion of what is right and wrong, the people tend to seek pleasure not through work, but through violence. As a logical consequence of this lack of morality, there is a great disregard for life.

It is obvious that the immediate annexation of these disturbing elements into our own federation in such large numbers would be sheer madness, so before we do that we must clean up the country, even if this means using the methods Divine Providence used on the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

We must destroy everything within our cannons’ range of fire. We must impose a harsh blockade so that hunger and its constant companion, disease, undermine the peaceful population and decimate the Cuban army. The allied army must be constantly engaged in reconnaissance and vanguard actions so that the Cuban army is irreparably caught between two fronts and is forced to undertake dangerous and desperate measures.

The most convenient base of operations will be Santiago de Cuba and Oriente province, from which it will be possible to verify the slow invasion from Camagüey, occupying as quickly as possible the ports necessary for the refuge of our squadrons in cyclone season. Simultaneously, or rather once these plans are fully in effect, a large army will be sent to Pinar del Río province with the aim of completing the naval blockade of Havana by surrounding it on land; but its real mission will be to prevent the enemy from consolidating its occupation of the interior, dispersing operative columns against the invading army from the east. Given the impregnable character of Havana, its is pointless to expose ourselves to painful losses in attacking it.

The troops in the west will use the same methods as those in the east.

Once the Spanish regular troops are dominated and have withdrawn, there will be a phase of indeterminate duration, of partial pacification in which we will continue to occupy the country militarily, using our bayonets to assist the independent government that it constitutes, albeit informally, while it remains a minority in the country. Fear, on the other hand, and its own interests on the other, will oblige the minority to become stronger and balance their forces, making a minority of autonomists and Spaniards who remain in the country.

When this moment arrives, we must create conflicts for the independent government. That government will be faced with these difficulties, in addition to the lack of means to meet our demands and the commitments made to us, war expenses and the need to organize a new country. These difficulties must coincide with the unrest and violence among the aforementioned elements, to whom we must give our backing.

To sum up, our policy must always be to support the weaker against the stronger, until we have obtained the extermination of them both, in order to annex the Pearl of the Antilles.

The probable date of our campaign will be next October (1898), but we should tie up the slightest detail in order to be ready, in case we find ourselves in the need to precipitate events in order to cancel the development of the autonomist movement that could annihilate the separatist movement. Although the greater part of these instructions are based on the different meetings we have held, we would welcome from you any observations that experience and appropriate action might advise as a correction, always, in the meantime, following the agreed upon lines.

Sincerely yours,

J.C. Breckenridge

http://www.historyofcuba.com/history/bmemo.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-11-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. quite the feat, to serve in another adminstration after his death indeed!!!
maybe his death made him senile and cranky????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC