While I swear I will never post Pablo Bachelet’s articles anywhere ever again because of his repeated lies about Haiti and his slanderous accusations about President Aristide, I break my own rule here.
After you read the article, you might consider whether the attack on the FARC was a “two-fer” – kill Reyes and pretend to seize evidence from FARC computers implicating Chavez as a financial supporter. It smells like a set-up.
MIAMI HERALD
Posted on Tue, Mar. 11, 2008
U.S. looking into terror list for Venezuela
BY PABLO BACHELET
http://www.miamiherald.com/top_stories/story/451650.html The Bush administration has launched a preliminary inquiry that could land
Venezuela on the U.S. list of nations that support terrorism because of its
alleged close links to Colombian rebels, a senior government official has
confirmed.
The inquiry, by government lawyers, is the first step in a process that
could see Venezuela join North Korea, Cuba, Sudan, Syria and Iran as
countries designated by the State Department as supporters of terrorism.
U.S. laws permit some leeway on the scope of sanctions, but experts say that
adding Venezuela to the list could force U.S. and even foreign firms to
sever or curtail links with one of the world's leading oil producers and the
owner of Citgo Petroleum.
The inquiry comes after Colombia seized four computers belonging to a
guerrilla leader in a March 1 raid into Ecuador. The documents suggest
Venezuela, among other things, promised $300 million to the Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.
The U.S. and Colombian governments and the European Union have officially
designated the FARC as a terrorist organization, but Venezuelan President
Hugo Chávez has said publicly that he considers it a legitimate insurgency.
A senior U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the
delicate nature of the subject, said government lawyers had been asked to
clarify ''what goes into effect in terms of prohibitions, or prohibited
activities'' when a country is put on the U.S. list.
The official was reluctant to predict if the FARC computer discoveries will
lead to sanctions, noting that U.S. investigators must first corroborate
their veracity. The lawyers have not yet returned their opinions.
But if the seized documents are shown to be true, the official added, ``I
think it will beg the question of whether or not Venezuela, given Chávez's
interactions with the FARC, has . . . crossed the threshold of state sponsor
of terror.''
Venezuela already is subject to a U.S. weapons sales ban and other sanctions
as a country that refuses to cooperate on terrorism matters -- though does
not necessarily sponsor them. Bush administration officials also complain
that Venezuela refuses to cooperate on drug-trafficking issues.
But declaring Venezuela a state sponsor of terrorism would push the
sanctions to a much higher degree.
Such a designation ''immediately imposes restrictions on the abilities of
U.S. companies to work in Venezuela,'' said James Lewis, a former State
Department arms-trafficking expert now with the Center for Strategic and
International Studies in Washington. ``It would make it very hard for
Venezuela to sell oil to the U.S.''
The State Department's website cites four categories of sanctions for
countries on the list, including restrictions on U.S. aid, a ban on weapons
sales, tightened export controls over U.S. items that have dual military and
civilian purposes, and ``miscellaneous financial and other restrictions.''
Lewis said the last category is ''the killer.'' Those sanctions, often
implemented by the Treasury Department's Office of Asset Control, or OFAC,
prohibit U.S. companies and banks from dealing with countries on the list.
Even non-U.S. companies are reluctant to do business with countries on the
list for fear of running afoul of U.S. sanctions, he added.
The designation could reach beyond oil fields. Boeing, for instance, would
need to be careful in its dealings with Venezuelan airlines, Lewis said.
Assets belonging to specially designated entities linked to the country
could see their financial assets in U.S. banks frozen.
But Lewis and other U.S. officials cautioned that the harsh sanctions
against a country like Iran, which was declared a state sponsor in 1984,
would not necessarily be replicated on Venezuela.
''There's not a standard template'' for sanctions, said OFAC spokesman John
Rankin.
But even a relatively gentle menu of sanctions would have strong economic
and foreign policy implications, given Venezuela's position as the
fourth-largest supplier of petroleum to the United States. The
government-owned PDVSA oil company owns Citgo Petroleum, which has several
U.S. refineries.
The ban on dual-use items could affect some deep-sea drilling equipment,
said Bill Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council, a
business group that usually opposes unilateral U.S. sanctions.
And any financial transaction with Venezuela would require a license from
the Treasury Department. The Commerce Department sets up a regimen that is
country-specific, with much discretion built into the system, Reinsch said.
''It's kind of a mystery how they get there,'' he said.
Chávez, who often rails against President Bush and U.S. policies, has
repeatedly threatened to cut off oil shipments to the United States in
response to what he views as possible threats of a U.S. attack against his
government.
========================================
WALTER LIPPMANN, CubaNews
Los Angeles, California
http://www.walterlippmann.comhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaNews/"Cuba - Un Paraiso bajo el bloqueo"
========================================
Bac