Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia to set up missile shield in Venezuela

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:31 PM
Original message
Russia to set up missile shield in Venezuela
In retaliation for US plans to station interceptors and radars in Eastern Europe, which Russia says could threaten its security, Kremlin is allegedly said to explore more far-reaching options to dissuade Pentagon from its intention.



Some experts see the cues that Russia could resort to more decisive actions while the US stated that it would proceed with its plans for a missile defense system in Eastern Europe whether or not any agreement is reached on an alternatives and arguments suggested by Russia.
The long-strained relations have further deteriorated after the NATO plans about Georgia and Ukraine.
Also, analysts appeared to claim that Russia stands behind Belarus’ recent multi-bullion dollar deal with Venezuela to set up an air defense system, the South American country that has been dynamically upgrading its naval fleet and coastal defenses to counter a possible U.S. blockade of its oil fields and prepare for direct military confrontation with Washington.
The deal envisions setting up a national air defense shield and modern communications system over the next six years.
"The deal will also help us pursue our other interests in Venezuela," said top military official of Belarus, commenting on the issue. Venezuela has already purchased aircrafts and weapons from Russia against the backdrop of its policy towards Washington.
The retaliatory efforts by Russia are seen as tantamount to the Caribbean missile crisis of the 1960s.
The 1962 stand-off was triggered when US screening aircrafts discovered Soviet missile bases in Cuba.
Kremlin’s then move to deploy these weapons in Cuba was at the time seen as a response to the build-up of powerful US missiles in Europe.
Oil was poured onto the troubled waters only when Soviet leader Khrushchev agreed to dismantle the bases in return for guarantees that Washington would not attack communist Cuba.
Now, Russia said the relations would not get as tense as it was attained during the Cuban crisis although relations were also to some extent eroded after the stance pursued by several western powers on Kosovo.
Russia’s response to recognize the independence of separatist regions of Georgia also emerged as a point worsening relations.
Against the backdrop of the current relations, some experts insist that Russia has recourse to reconsider cooperation with foes of the United States while some analysts don’t go so pessimist about the developments.
The US insists its plan to install radar and interceptor systems Poland and Czech Republic is not directed against Russia. The Moscow warned the West that "adequate and prompt measures" would be taken in response.
“In violation of previous agreements, certain NATO members are building up their resources next to our borders. Russia cannot remain indifferent to the obvious muscle-flexing on our doorstep,” President Putin told generals in a meeting broadcasted on state television a few months ago.
Russia’s chief of general staff Yuri Baluyevsky also said the missile shield the United States intends to build in Central Europe is unquestionably aimed at Russia but nobody.
”If the Americans deploy the tracker systems and interceptors, they will certainly be directed against Russia, and we have easy proof in hand. In the issue of missile defense system, Iran is a pretext invented by the United States to get ready against Russia,” he said.
Analysts also think there is no so-called Iranian threat looming on the horizon because Iran is not capable of developing such long-flying missiles to hit the United States.
“European missile shield….is certainly not directed against Iran”.
However, the US think-tank, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, says: "Iran presently enjoys the capability to use ballistic missiles or long-range artillery rockets against its regional neighbors, Israel, and US forces deployed in the region”.
http://www.xabar.info/news.php?id=373
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. In summary, the Bush Junta is scaring the fuck out of everybody and stoking an
arms race. As if U.S./Bush war profiteers didn't have enough of a boondoggle in Iraq/Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Undoubtedly these people realize that where JFK poured all his energy into finding a peaceful
solution, Bush won't. Even the very thought makes you guffaw!

He has been working from the assumption that if anyone could have done anything about his vicious behavior they would have already done it, therefore, he's the biggest, strongest (due to his theft of the U.S. Presidency) kid on the block, and he can do anything he wants anytime to anyone.

Whereas far better men would ALWAYS tread gingerly, we can be sure Bush will not.

Could be the rest of the world is simply getting too stressed out having this asshole holding the entire world hostage to neo-con greed and treachery. I hope they can tactfully encourage him to start using his brain, but that's almost impossible to imagine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC