"We still have not calibrated in all its magnitude, the significance of what happened on this day six years ago, and above all, the consequences, the impact." --Chavez
"'The great Venezuelan victory of April 2002 contributed in a powerful manner to changing the course of history,' he argued pointing to the continental revolt against neo-liberalism and US domination across Latin America spearheaded by the Bolivarian revolution...."
----------------------------
The truth of this struck me one day, not long ago, in thinking about events in South America. That amazing, peaceful peoples' revolt against a violent rightwing military coup in Venezuela actually REVERSED the course of history. It was a mighty backlash against the past, as well as the beginning of a tidal wave of change.
It really is the most important event in South American history since the revolution against Spain led by Simon Bolivar nearly two centuries ago. And, like our own revolution, April 11/Venezuela was "the shot heard round the world"--an event that electrified existing power regimes and changed everything. In our case, now the people would be the "sovereign power," as opposed to monarchs. And in Venezuela's case, on April 11--or, as the signs remind us, on April 13--the right of the people of
South America as the "sovereign power" in their own lands was finally established. No more "banana republics." No more Chiles. No more U.S.-instigated destruction of Latin American democracies and installation of fascist regimes and heinous dictators. No more looting and plundering and enslavement. The peaceful democracy movement that had been on the rise for some time, throughout South America, was given hope and heart by this remarkable Venezuelan defense of their Constitution and their elected government.
And it is extraordinary that the revolt against the coup was peacefully done, by the sheer number of people who filled the streets around Miraflores Palace. Also remarkable, that the corporate news monopolies put an "Iron Curtain" over the news, cooperating with the coup (and, in the case of RCTV, sponsoring the coup), and it
didn't work--word got around
anyway that Chavez had not resigned. It was a triumph of word-of-mouth communication overcoming a fascist lock on the media. The title of the Irish filmmakers' documentary about these events--"The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"--works both ways: The fascist putsch was not to be televised; nor the peoples' revolt against it, and their re-establishment of law and order. The corporate news monopolies--by their utter corruption as journalists--made themselves
irrelevant.
Both things are just amazing--considering the
past history in South America: the
peaceful re-establishment of Constitutional government, and the victory of people-to-people communication over the multi-billion dollar propaganda machine of the corporate rulers.
Chavez nails it. This is the event that changed everything--in Venezuela, in the region and in U.S.-Latin American relations. It was simply unprecedented for a U.S.-backed fascist coup to fail, and to fail in this way: massive peaceful resistance.
I also agree with him that it has deep connections to the leftist sweep of the continent--in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador and Uruguay--and the coming sweep of Central America, starting with the
least likely elections of leftists, in Nicaragua and in Guatemala. In Nicaragua, the very man getting elected president whom the Reaganites violently overthrew, and whom the Bushites hate--Daniel Ortega. And troubled Guatemala electing its first progressive government, ever, on a platform of social justice against a rightwing 'police state' opponent. Guatemala--where the Reaganites slaughtered 200,000 Mayan indians in the 1980s, on suspicion of their being leftists. Mexico likely elected a leftist, as well--in an election that is widely believed to have been stolen by the Bushite right (--the Bushites want to privatize Mexican oil, and, of course, don't want a peaceful, leftist, democratic revolution on the U.S. border--the people of the U.S. might get ideas).
Paraguay will be next--with the election of the beloved "bishop of the poor," Fernando Lugo, this coming weekend (barring violent Bush-CIA interference). Lugo is ahead in the polls, and it is certainly time for Paraguay to join the revolution and reap its benefits in clean government, social justice and regional integration. Paraguay is important to Monsanto and other agrofuel monoculture corporations (soy), and is important both to Bush Cartel drug/weapons trafficking and to U.S.-Rumsfeld strategic military planning against the Andes democracies--where the oil is--especially Venezuela and Ecuador--and their ally, Bolivia, which borders Paraguay. Bolivia's eastern provinces bordering Paraguay are a hotbed of fascist, white supremicist activity against Evo Morales' central government. Morales is the first indigenous president of Bolivia (a largely indigenous country), and the eastern landowners want to split off their provinces and take the gas and oil reserves with them. The Bush Cartel's rumored purchase of a 100,000 acre enclave, near the U.S. air based in Paraguay, is in close proximity to these secessionary provinces in Bolivia. I expect major trouble there this year--as the Bushites try to re-gain some strategic ground in South America, for their last desperate "surge" for oil.
The final two South American dinosaurs are Peru, run by corrupt "free tradists," and Colombia, where thousands of union leaders and other leftists have been murdered by death squads with close ties to the government--a government on whom the Bushites have larded $5.5 BILLION of our tax dollars in military aid. Peru will likely go leftist in the next election cycle (2009? 2010? not sure). And, at that point, Colombia will be completely isolated--and very probably some kind of concerted continental effort will impose peace on Colombia (ending its 40+ year civil war and slaughter of leftists) and also disengaging it from the corrupt, failed, murderous, pesticide-spraying U.S. "war on drugs."
The Colombian "free trade" deal--that Donald Rumsfeld* and Mark Penn (i.e., Hillary Clinton) so desired--has been 'postponed' by our so-called Democratic Congress, but it will likely make a comeback after November, engineered by the corporate Democrats. Alvaro Uribe (Bush pal, former Medellin Cartel, 'president' of Colombia) will likely have to go, in order for the U.S. to gain this wedge into the South American economy (and, like Israel, I think Uribe's going to find out just how treacherous the Bush Cartel is). Rumsfeld & pals have so far failed to stir up a war--chaos, destabilization, bloodshed--not for lack of trying. And I don't think they're done. I think we're going to see serious trouble in Bolivia before it's over. But they will fail, in the end--for the reason laid out by Chavez in this 4/11 speech. South America is now the democratic bastion of the hemisphere. Democracies are difficult to overturn if they stick together--which they seem to be doing in South America. It is very unlike the Middle East, where undemocratic factions are at war with each other over the oil--and thus have been easily manipulated, bullied and slaughtered by the Bush Junta. Chavez himself and his government--and the people of Venezuela--have set the example: share the oil; control it democratically and use it as a bootstrap, for the poor and for whole countries. Use it to get neighbor countries out of ruinous, U.S.-dominated World Bank/IMF debt; use it for national and regional development; use it for education and medical care, and land reform. Be generous. Don't fight about it.
Use it for the
common good.
And this strong potential for successful democratic resistance against U.S. interference and domination, that now exists in South America (and is spreading to Central America), has its origins on that day, April 11, 2002, when the courageous Venezuelan poor came out of their hovels, and braved rightwing death squads, guns, tanks, soldiers and police, and said "No!" to another U.S.-backed coup.
I found it interesting that the first words on Venezuelans' lips--in "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"--were, "What about our Constitution?!". Yeah, they wanted their elected president back, but that was not their first concern. This was not about one man--and it never has been. It is about democracy and the rule of law, as opposed to the lawless corporate predators that have exploited and bullied Latin America for decades, and that now entirely control the U.S. government. The issue is the sovereignty of the people, here and there, in relation to these global corporate predators (Exxon Mobil, Monsanto, et al). And there, in South America, over those three days--April 11-13--the people won. And everything changed.
-------------------
*
"The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants Like Chávez," by Donald Rumsfeld, 12/1/07http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/30/AR2007113001800.html