Saint Patrick Goes to Haiti

[magbana]

Saint Patrick Goes to Haiti
by Brian Concannon Jr.
Global Research, May 1, 2008
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8862

Saint Patrick is celebrated in Haiti, although not with the green beer
and clothes he inspires in the United States. There he is better known
as Dambala, a loa or spirit who often appears in the form of the snake
in Haiti’s Vodou religion. Dambala and the other spirits were brought
from West Africa to Haiti in slave ships that brought the ancestors of
today’s Haitians across the Atlantic. Vodou was brutally suppressed,
so the Haitians disguised their worship by representing their spirits
with Christian symbols and icons. St. Patrick, often painted with
snakes at his feet, and himself an escaped slave, must have seemed a
good match. So centuries later, prints of St. Patrick with his staff
and his bishop’s mitre still preside over the drumming and chanting of
vodou ceremonies in Haiti.

In the United States, St. Patrick is celebrated with sad songs that
recognize the starvation and injustice that drove the ancestors of
today’s revelers across the Atlantic. One of the saddest and most
popular of these songs, The Fields of Athenry, can bring tears to your
eyes, whether it is sung softly in the original folk version or
shouted in the punk rock remake by the Dropkick Murphys. The song
begins:

By a lonely prison wall

I heard a young girl calling
Michael, they have taken you away
For you stole Trevelyn's corn
So the young might see the morn
Now a prison ship lies waiting in the bay.

At first blush this is personal tragedy- a young man deported from
Ireland (to Australia), leaving his wife and young children behind,
perhaps forever. All because he stole food to keep his kids alive. But
with more context, the personal tragedy evolves into a natural and
economic disaster, and eventually into an outrageous international
injustice.

The song’s Trevelyn is Sir Charles Edward Trevelyn, a British
bureaucrat during the Great Irish Famine of 1845-1849. By 1845 Britain
had controlled Ireland for centuries, during which the large British
landowners (and a few wealthy Irish ones) had, with government help,
pushed Irish peasants into smaller and smaller parcels. Although the
Emerald Isle was a fertile country that grew more beef, grain and
other food than it needed, most of that food was grown on large
estates and exported to Britain. Irish peasants -- the majority of the
population -- ate mostly potatoes because that was the only crop they
could grow enough of to feed their families on their small plots. So
when a fungus killed almost the entire potato crop in 1845 (and again
for the next four years), the peasants had nothing to eat.

Sir Charles Trevelyn was responsible for managing the British
government’s relief efforts during the Famine. These efforts were the
outrageous international injustice. British relief programs did save
lives, but they did not come close to matching the need, because the
government refused to take life-saving measures if they conflicted
with its free-market economic theories. Trevelyn himself welcomed the
famine as a "mechanism for reducing surplus population."

“Trevelyn’s corn” was dried corn that the British government bought
from the U.S. to distribute cheaply to the hungry. The government
feared interfering with the free market more than it feared people
starving to death, so it refused corn rations to anyone who could
theoretically buy food on the market. This included people physically
able to work but unable to find jobs in a collapsed economy, and
families with any land- even a quarter acre. The economic theories did
not fill empty stomachs, so people not theoretically poor enough for
help starved to death while food sat undistributed in the warehouses.

Meanwhile, the potato blight did not affect other crops, including
beef and grain. Ireland continued to be a net exporter of food
throughout the famine. Keeping the food in Ireland would have saved
lives, but it might have interfered with the free market. So the
British kept eating beef and grain imported from a starving Ireland.
Some Irish desperately ate their island’s famously green grass: they
were found dead, with green stains around their mouths.

Trevelyn’s “mechanism” for reducing Ireland’s population worked. Over
one million people- by conservative estimates- were reduced to their
graves, starved to death or killed by the diseases of hunger. More
than 2 million were forced to flee the island- to America, England,
Australia and many other places where St. Patrick is honored. All
told, Ireland lost a quarter of its population.

Today, the Great Famine is as much a distant memory in Ireland as it
is in Boston, New York or San Francisco. After centuries of being one
of the poorest nations in Western Europe, Ireland is now one of the
wealthiest and peaceful countries in the world, the product of an
economic boom fueled by strong government investment, especially in
education and infrastructure.

But a century and a half after the Great Famine, people in Haiti are
still being killed by the same economic theories. Haiti has made
headlines recently, for people eating cookies made of salt, butter and
brown dirt to hold off starvation. The stories were, at first blush, a
personal tragedy (a mother unable to feed her infant son) and a
natural and economic disaster (hurricanes, high fuel prices). But with
more context, the personal tragedy evolves into an outrageous
international injustice.

For decades, the World Bank and the Inter-America Development Bank
(IDB) propped up Haitian dictators with generous loans. The notorious
“Papa Doc” and “Baby Doc” -- Francois and Jean-Claude Duvalier--
received almost half of Haiti’s current outstanding loans. The
Duvaliers used the money to buy warm fur coats and fast cars, and to
fund the brutal Tonton Macoute death squads. In return, the
international community, especially the United States, received a
reliable vote against Fidel Castro in the United Nations and the
Organization of American States.

The Haitian people received very little from these loans. Since 1980,
when Haiti started receiving the Banks’ help in earnest, its per
capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has shrunk by 38.3%. Along the
way, Haiti became the poorest country in the Americas, and one of the
hungriest countries in the world. Today, about half of school-age kids
in Haiti are not in school. Over half of all Haitians struggle to
survive on $1 a day or less, and life expectancy is in the mid-50’s.
Many of those who can flee do so, including cities like Boston and New
York, that sheltered the refugees from Ireland’s famine.

The loans lavished on the Duvaliers and other dictators are now due,
so Haiti’s elected government is sending almost a million dollars
every week to the well-appointed offices of the World Bank and the IDB
in Washington. Like Ireland exporting beef while people starved, Haiti
is exporting money while people die of poverty.

The World Bank and the IDB are not commercial banks. They are funded
by our tax dollars, and were not established to make a profit. They
are supposed to be, in the World Bank’s words, “working for a world
free of poverty.” Like the British in Ireland, the Banks have their
“relief programs” for Haiti, including programs that will eventually
forgive a portion of Haiti’s debt. But like the British response to
Ireland’s famine, the Bank programs do not rise to the seriousness of
the situation.

The Banks’ programs are too late -- they will not provide full relief
for months, perhaps years. The Banks started their programs in 1996,
but would not admit Haiti until 2007. Like the British declaring the
starving Irish theoretically able to work, in 2000 the World Bank
declared Haiti theoretically able to pay its debts, and therefore
ineligible for the Bank’s help: “espite being very poor and having
a relatively significant external debt level, …. after taking
advantage of other sources of debt relief, Haiti’s debt …. will be
reduced to a sustainable level.” So Haiti has just started jumping
through the many hoops required to receive relief.

The Banks’ programs are also too little – they stop where the
requirements of helping poor people conflict with the requirements of
the Banks’ economic theories. The Banks could simply cancel Haiti’s
debts, especially those from loans given to dictators, which would
immediately make a million dollars a week available for life-saving
government programs. But the very institutions that gave generously to
the Duvaliers-- knowing full well how the money was being spent-- now
demand “accountability” from Haiti’s democratic government before
cancelling the dictators’ debts. Accountability means, in part, that
the government has an economic plan that satisfies the Banks’ free
market theories. Haiti’s plan is not yet available, but the Banks have
required other poor countries to demonstrate accountability by
slashing public health and education spending. For now, accountability
means keeping the $1 million coming every week, while the citizens of
Haiti eat dirt.

The citizens of the United States could put a stop to this injustice
immediately. We pay the largest share of the Banks’ costs, and have
the largest say in the Banks’ governance. If our leaders made
cancellation of Haiti’s debt a priority, the debts would be cancelled.

Some members of the U.S. House of Representatives have taken the first
step towards ending this injustice. In mid-February, Rep. Maxine
Waters circulated a letter that 53 of her colleagues signed, urging
the U.S. Treasury Department to arrange the immediate suspension of
all debt payments from Haiti. The Haiti Debt Cancellation resolution
in the House, House Resolution 241, seeks to permanently cancel
Haiti’s IDB and World Bank debts, and has 66 co-sponsors.

In The Fields of Athenry, Michael calls out his final words to his
wife Mary:

Against the famine and the Crown
I rebelled, they cut me down
Now you must raise our child with dignity.

If his children survived, Michael’s wish would have eventually come
true. Athenry, Ireland, is now a dignified tourist destination and
commuter town, known for its quaint medieval buildings and ruins.
People do not flee Athenry anymore, or steal corn to feed their
children. Instead, people move there for jobs and opportunity - the
latest census classifies one in five Athenry residents as “not Irish.”

The children of “Michel” and “Marie” in Haiti deserve the same chance
at dignity and prosperity that the children of Michael and Mary
received. They can take a big step in the right direction if the
international community lets Haiti’s government invest in its people,
their education and the infrastructure, rather than in payments to
wealthy banks. So this St. Patrick’s Day, as we sing about long-ago
starvation and injustice in what is now a wealthy island, we should
also think about the misery and injustice under St. Patrick’s eyes in
Haiti, an outrage we can still do something about.

Human rights lawyer Brian Concannon Jr., [e-mail], directs the
Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti (IJDH). More information on
the fight to relieve Haiti’s burden of debt can be found on IJDH’s
website, www.ijdh.org