Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About Golinger, Wilpert, venezuelanalysis and the Venezuelan Consuls in the US, Mark Weisbrot , etc.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
spanza Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 06:48 AM
Original message
About Golinger, Wilpert, venezuelanalysis and the Venezuelan Consuls in the US, Mark Weisbrot , etc.
From 2004:
The Center for Public Integrity
http://projects.publicintegrity.org/oil/report.aspx?aid=383

Venezuela Head Polishes Image With Oil Dollars
President Hugo Chavez takes his case to America's streets

Chavez has spent more than $1.6 million from mid-2003 through June 2004 on lobbying the federal government in Washington. The country also created its own Washington mouthpiece called the Venezuela Information Office (VIO) in July 2003 and soon after hired a top U.S. protest organizer as its executive director

~~~~

At protests, conferences, and college campuses, VIO employees handed out literature and played The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, a documentary of Venezuela's 2002 aborted military coup. The VIO e-mailed several independent film theaters about showing the movie throughout the year.

The VIO also coordinated a "rapid response" team to combat news articles and editorials critical of Chavez. Eva Golinger, a writer at the pro-Chavez Web site, Venezuelanalysis.com, was asked to be a member of the team in September 2003.

~~~~

Some members of the VIO's "rapid response" team were officially connected to the Venezuelan government, such as Antonio Padrino, the press secretary in Venezuela's Miami consulate, while others were part of activist groups, such as Chuck Kaufman, a coordinator of the Nicaragua Network.

~~~~

The VIO abruptly ended operations at the end of January 2004, only to reconstitute itself a month later with a reshuffled staff and a budget of $660,000. James was put on the payroll and became executive director of the new VIO. She is currently on leave from Global Exchange. Converse has stayed on at VIO, working on media relations. According to records, the new VIO is incorporated in Florida under the name VIO Investments Corp. and is owned by Isaura and Evelio Gilmond.

~~~~

The new VIO signed a $60,000 subcontract with Lumina Strategies in May 2004. Headed by Michael Shellenberger, a former Global Exchange employee, the group plans to oversee media relations and provide strategic counsel to Venezuela's government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. the rapid response Chavista team at DU is missing out on the gravy train
or maybe not???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Unrecced. From 2004? really? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It is certinaly worth noting
that the famous unbiased sources of information we hear so much about here are in fact paid Chavez shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. This has been posted here before. And Weisbrot has nothing to do
with the VIO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Exposing the roots of the Venezuelan propaganda structure in the US is educational
for those LatAm forum newcomers that otherwise might be inclined to uncritically accept whatever is published by Golinger, Wilpert, Weisbrot, and venezuelanalysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Mark takes the report apart in his response
To the Editor:

The Center for Public Integrity report "Venezuela Head Polishes Image with Oil Dollars" by Kevin Bogardus is highly misleading. Although we make no accusations of intent, the article strings together unrelated facts, innuendo, and a few denials of things that have no evidence to support them in the first place—to create a false impression of organizations and individuals who support democracy in Venezuela.

The article seems to imply that several individuals and organizations were influenced either by the Venezuelan Information Office (VIO) or something worse to take the side of an oil-rich government. But there is no evidence for this: all of these people had written about or taken action regarding Venezuela before the VIO existed, and in fact before any of the lobbying efforts described in the article occurred.

It is not even clear why most of these individuals and organizations would be the subject of an article—part of a series of articles—on oil-producing states buying influence in the United States. After all, the Venezuelan Information Office contacted hundreds of people, including most of the journalists writing about Venezuela for major newspapers and wire services, editorial boards, and members of Congress and their staff. The implication is that those chosen for the article were influenced or "bought."

The article is also strongly prejudiced in its treatment of issues regarding Venezuela. In several instances, including the opening sentence, the report indicates that Chávez was responsible for the coup against him. This is of course the official line of the Venezuelan opposition: the government "forced" the state-owned oil company, PDVSA, to set aside money for "his" social programs. . The idea that $1.7 billion for social programs would reduce investment at PDVSA is also a minority view even among the extremist opposition, as well as among independent industry analysts.

http://projects.publicintegrity.org/oil/report.aspx?aid=422

lol


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Tremendous article pointing out some details not mentioned by the original!
From your great reference:
It is also worth noting that Miriam Kornblith, who is identified as the "Lead Social Scientist" responsible for your "Global Integrity" report on Venezuela is part of the Venezuelan opposition. Miriam Kornblith currently represents the opposition on the National Electoral Council (CNE). She is also listed (see NED Grant No. 2003-548.0, page 5) as an advisor to Súmate, a group that led the signature drive to recall Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.

Súmate has received US taxpayers' dollars for its political and electoral activities in Venezuela, something that has been quite controversial. Súmate has also refused to recognize the results of Venezuela's August 15 referendum, which failed to recall the President by a margin of 59 to 41 percent, and continues to promote the theory that a massive electronic fraud took place. The referendum result was certified by the Carter Center, the Organization of American States, and other international observers, who found no evidence of fraud.

The Center's reliance on opposition sources for its work on Venezuela is the journalistic equivalent of relying on the White House press office for a report on Pentagon outsourcing.


We hope you will take the time to learn more about Venezuela from a more diverse set of sources. You might find that there is even some good investigative reporting that needs to be done: millions (and possibly tens of millions) of U.S. taxpayers' dollars are being used to subvert democracy there. It is an effort with striking parallels to Washington's intervention in Chile between 1970-73, which led to 16 years of brutal dictatorship.
Thanks for taking the time to look for a superb related article. The Democrats thank you! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, this article is incorrect.
The VIO reconstituted itself as the Latin American Information Office and became a more collaborative effort. I haven't talked to anyone there for a long time so I have no idea how they're doing.

It's a great idea, though, as a way to push back on the right wing noise machine here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanza Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who would trust the credibility of an information site about US politics edited by a US Consul
and the husband of another US Consul ???

Who would have the ingenuity to believe that such site is an independent source ??

Venezuelanalysis is exactly that. And since it is almost the exclusive source for all the pro-Chavez posters' threads concerning Venezuela here, it is certainly worth mentioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. I gather that our efforts here to provide alternative information on Venezuela,
and the efforts of superb researchers and analysts like Mark Weisbrot, and the tough investigative journalism of Eva Golinger--who has provided so many important FOIA revelations and other hard information--and the work of so many truth-seekers on Venezuela and on the leftist democracy movement throughout Latin America, and those who have spread the word on the Irish filmmakers' documentary, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised," and the work of Oliver Stone in his documentary "South of the Border," and the work of many researchers, writers, leftist advocacy groups and individuals in England, Europe and the U.S., and in Latin America, is beginning to put some serious dents in the U.S./corporate media slander campaign against their bogeyman Chavez and (they never tell you) against the Left in Latin America and against the millions and millions of people who are benefiting from Leftist policies and who support and vote for Leftist leaders in Latin America. They are the "enemy," to the Corporate Rulers. They just use Chavez as a convenient punching bag--and a typically propagandistic ploy.* Remember this: The real enemy of our Corporate Rulers, in Latin America and here, is the voters and democracy itself.

The U.S./corporate lies about Venezuela are fraying at the edges--as with so many of their "Big Lie" campaigns. I'm very glad to see this happening, at long last. We should all be very encouraged to post yet more alternative information about Venezuela and other countries blessed with Leftist governments--which means they are blessed with honest elections (something we've lost here in the U.S.) and with awesome grass roots organization (something else we need to recover here). Our people need to know--and want to know--the truth. I don't have any monopoly on the truth, nor does anyone here. But I DO recognize a "Big Lie" campaign when I see it. And that is the truth about our corporate media and Chavez. They are outright lying--consistently and egregiously, and, indeed, monotonously (they all sound the same)--about Chavez, his government, Venezuela and the big Leftist movement throughout the region. Lying through their teeth, day in, day out. It is quite mind-boggling. And though none of us has any monopoly on the truth, what we CAN do is provide ALTERNATIVE information. Let the uninformed consider it all and reach for the truth themselves. This is what our Corporate Media do NOT provide--a balanced picture.

Why do people vote for Chavez, in big numbers, consistently over time--in honest elections? Why do people vote for Evo Morales? Rafael Correa? Lula da Silva? Dilma Rousseff? Cristina Fernandez? Daniel Ortega? And all the others? THE CORPORATE MEDIA NEVER TELLS YOU! They tell you all these leaders' (especially Chavez's) flaws. They never tell you why people vote for them.

I just read the most lying article about Chavez that I have ever read--and that's saying something--by Jackson Diehl in the Washington Pest, in which Diehl discusses "Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez" vs. "the democratically elected Colombian leader" Manuel Santos. It is of no interest to this propagandist that leftists are routinely murdered in Colombia--thousands of trade unionists, teachers, community activists, human rights workers, peasant farmers and others have been slaughtered by the Colombian military and its death squads--while nobody dies in Venezuela for their political views and in fact the Chavez government has greatly improved public participation and voter turnouts--and furthermore runs clean, transparent, internationally certified elections. Can Colombia even be said to have a democracy, when so many of the advocates of the poor have been murdered with near total impunity? Yet Venezuela CLEARLY has a democracy, that has CLEARLY been improved upon by the Chavez government, yet Chavez gets called a "strongman." He's a strong leftist leader, that's true--much in the mold of FDR--but he is NOT a "strongman" or "dictator" or any of the other epithets they throw at him.

Bald-faced lies. STAGGERING lies. But it's wearing thin, as "Big Lies" do--and as Spanza's post tells us. When the Corporate Rulers and War Profiteers tell such outrageous lies as the one above--that Chavez is a "strongman" while Santos is "democratically elected"--we know that panic is setting in, and when they start attacking those who call them on their lies, we know that their lies are starting to fail. People aren't believing them any more.

This OP and its rancid hit piece are a good sign.

---------------------------

*(The focus on a bogeyman is typically a war profiteer tactic, which makes the use of Chavez as a bogeyman very worrisome. I am reminded of the very focused effort to make "Saddam Hussein" the issue in that U.S. war on Iraq, and to demonize that figure, when, in truth, the real target was a million innocent Iraqis who were slaughtered--about a hundred thousand in the first weeks of bombing alone, and the rest in later bombings, shootings, tortures, imprisonments, displacements, disease, deliberately induced civil mayhem and other horrors of war. The object was to brutalize and subdue the Iraqi people and to force them to do the will of the Bush Junta. Our Corporate/War Profiteer Rulers are using the SAME tactic on a DEMOCRATIC president who has had the massive support of his people and who has harmed NO ONE--and is in fact a good president. This is truly scary--not only because of the omens of another oil war, but also because it is so audacious. I hope that its audaciousness ends up backfiring on them--and Spanza's post may be a sign that it is--but this Corporate propaganda machine is very dangerous, as well as anti-democratic and corrosive of society.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanza Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have little trust for informative structures which are built by ministries and consulates
Like your exclusive source for Venezuelan news around here.

It's certainly useful to know who they are and who gives a salary to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC