Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USA Today endorses Obama's plan. Says GOP call to start over is "a politically motivated stall."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 06:19 AM
Original message
USA Today endorses Obama's plan. Says GOP call to start over is "a politically motivated stall."
Our view on medical overhaul: Obama lays cards on table. Where’s the GOP health bid?

<SNIP>

If Republicans harbored any illusions that Obama would go back to the drawing board, as they've been demanding, he dashed them with his some-from-Column A, some-from-Column B approach to the separate health bills passed by House and Senate Democrats. His plan is as easy to pick on as its precursors were. (What change of this scale isn't?) But strip away all the Washington ax grinding and ideological infighting, and the plan can be put to a very simple test: Would it produce a health care system better than today's — one that would leave people confident that they could get high-quality care at a reasonable price? The answer is yes. And for all our misgivings about aspects of the plan, that is not a close call.

In a nation where 46 million people lack health insurance, Obama's proposal would eventually cover more than 30 million. It would provide subsidies to help lower-income people buy policies. And it would eliminate an array of noxious insurance company practices, such as denying coverage to people with pre-existing medical conditions.

Like other plans on the left and right, the biggest weakness in Obama's is that it falls short in curbing the medical inflation that threatens to send premiums and the federal deficit soaring. It's disappointing that the president further weakened the "Cadillac" tax on expensive health insurance plans, one of the most important ways to discourage overuse of medical care — and cut costs.

The larger picture, though, is that his plan would improve the lives of tens of millions of people without increasing the budget deficit. Republicans, by tossing bombs while refusing to negotiate, effectively stand for the unacceptable status quo, which is doubly troubling because individual Republicans have good ideas. Obama has adopted some, notably ones aimed at reducing Medicare and Medicaid fraud. He should take more, such as malpractice reform to reduce costly "defensive medicine." But responding to Obama's plan Monday, Republicans pretty much stuck with their drumbeat of demonization and obstruction, which has proved politically profitable.

Key Republicans have dropped their support for fixes they once supported, such as curbing Medicare spending and requiring everyone to have medical insurance as a matter of personal responsibility. And the only coherent alternative the GOP has collectively produced would barely cover an extra 3 million people out of 46 million uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office, at least 27 million fewer than the Democrats' bills.

At Thursday's televised summit, Obama will meet with Democratic and Republican leaders to talk about a bipartisan health fix. There's nothing we'd like to see more than the two parties joining hands to repair a system that works well for some Americans but harms or bankrupts too many others. But we have no delusions that starting over, as Republicans now insist, is anything but a politically motivated stall.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/02/debate-on-medical-overhaul-our-view-obama-lays-cards-on-table-wheres-the-gop-health-bid-.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. This is playing out like the primaries. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's 3am PST, and Morning Douche is predicting POTUS' failure and saying he's overexposed.
I wish there was another political show on at this time. FOr some reason I always watch this show. I think because I'm hoping someone will put him in his place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is "Mourning Joe" still chirping about Obama being too uppity ... I mean overexposed?
Of all the criticisms, that one is probably the lamest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The guy loves to hear himself talk. I remember he actually called Obama a narcissist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. My first thought was...
...this yo-yo is on for 3 hours a day & he thinks the President is overexposed? LOL

That's nothing. I think I just saw a posting or article somewhere where Rush called HCR "reparations" & said it was a "civil rights bill".

That's something I haven't heard before. May be the talking-point-du-jour. We'll see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. The minute someone (probably Bonehead) says:
"I think we should start over." The President should immediately shoot him down with:

"That's not gonna happen. What else do you got?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good. USA Today's reader is our target audience. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Agreed. And the phenomenon of "critical mass" begins right THERE!
The NO-ville repukes have cried wolf once too often.
Have you noticed? They just DO NOT KNOW when to stop.

Taking their old idol's advice: "When the enemy is
shooting himself in the foot - do NOT disturb him."
Don't know whether Atwater has turned over in his
grave yet, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh .... just WAIT until you see the "hypocrisy hits home" OPs I'm ABOUT to post...
... FUN! FUN! FUN!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC