Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Restores Former Pentagon Line of Succession

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:13 AM
Original message
Obama Restores Former Pentagon Line of Succession
Pentagon Memo
Obama Restores Former Pentagon Line of Succession

By THOM SHANKER
Published: March 16, 2010


WASHINGTON — It is a morbid theme, but one that no superpower can ignore. So the Obama administration has quietly reviewed, and revised, the sequence in which Pentagon civilian officials would take command should Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates die unexpectedly, say in a surprise attack.

An executive order published without fanfare this month does away with a system for Pentagon succession instituted by former President George W. Bush, which played down the service secretaries and elevated positions held at the time by trusted aides to Donald H. Rumsfeld, who as defense secretary wanted it that way.

These plans governing Pentagon succession are intended to guarantee civilian control of the military during a doomsday situation, like a nuclear strike or a terrorist attack, when the defense secretary could be taken out of action at the moment when war-fighting decisions must be made. The Bush order, issued in December 2005, continued the traditional sequence of the deputy defense secretary as next in line. But it booted the Army secretary out of the No. 3 slot in the order of succession, in favor of the under secretary of defense for intelligence.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/us/17pentagon.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I really appreciate this.
I didn't know that the previous administration had made this particular power grab, I must admit.

I think it is good that he returned it back to the way it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good.

Next, stow the 'combatant commanders' and bring back the CINCs.

This President unlike his predecessor can handle the idea of multiple CINCs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Secretary of defense for intelligence? Of course it was that way. Rummy wanted his
cronies in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fluffing up the pillows in the Lincoln Bedroom
This must be the "change we can believe in". :eyes: No single-payer, no financial reform, same old bloated defense budget, but I'll bet the furniture in the White House will all be properly arranged. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting all the things that the bush admin did that
the Obama admin is having to work through to get our country on a better course starting with the Economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC