Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Press unloads on Scott Brown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:30 AM
Original message
Bill Press unloads on Scott Brown

Scott Brown blows opportunity to lead

By Bill Press

<...>

What a huge disappointment. With Elena Kagan, Brown had an opportunity to prove his potential as a real leader — and blew it.

At her confirmation hearing, Brown sat alongside John Kerry and praised Kagan as a person with exceptional legal qualifications. Later, to his credit, he stepped up and defended her against charges by fellow Republicans that she was anti-military.

But then, when push came to shove, in the final vote on confirmation, he voted against her. Based, he said, on the lame excuse that she had no prior judicial experience.

What a weenie. What a cop-out. What nonsense. Even a high-schooler knows that some of the greatest Supreme Court justices — including Chief Justices William Rehnquist, Earl Warren and John Marshall — never served in the courtroom before joining the nation’s highest court.

We all know Scott Brown voted against Elena Kagan for only one reason: because he was told to do so by Mitch McConnell.

Poor Scott Brown. He looked like a statesman, but he turned out to be just another party hack.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. You won't see a better use of the term "weenie" in serious political analysis
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would be wise to lower your expectations when it comes to Scott Brown
He'll be the next Lieberman someday -- a wishy-washy slimeball who always fucks the left wing over in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. He would need to IMPROVE to become Lieberman
He is a Republican who only occasionally votes with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Brown is a brown noser for the Party of No Ideas
Big surprise.


Not.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R - I like Bill Press! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Voinovich gave the same lame excuse--no judicial experience...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And why did she have no judicial experience?
Republicans wouldn't hold the hearings when Clinton picked her for the Federal Bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I didn't expect anything more from him.
What a complete and total waste George was for Ohio...biggest do-nothing politician on the planet. Just floated along, and voted the party line, fuck Ohio, fuck the country, I got it made.


I guess he couldn't figure out a way for his brother to get rich off federal contracts, so George lost interest and retired on active duty years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. A caller to Thom H's show yesterday askedBernie Sanders WHY
the Pubs always seem to stick together & vote as a bloc & the Dems can rarely get everybody on their side to do the same? Bernie said "First, McConnell is a very strict leader & DEMANDS unison". He didn't say how Mitch does that, but I sspect some kind of threats. That seems t me to b the Pubs way of doing things. Remember Tom Delay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Maybe these threats need to be exposed
Im sure there are people who can find out what the threats the Republican leader place on their minions and that information will only
make them look the fools they already are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Wonder what he's threatening them with because
on this vote, five Republicans ignored him.

Scott Brown = Weenie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Might go back to the differences in the people drawn to each party
Remember when Lakoff spoke of the right as expecting an authoritarian father figure to set the rules - why we didn't. It might be that even among their elected figures leaders are given more respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R and love this line
"Poor Scott Brown. He looked like a statesman, but he turned out to be just another party hack."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. He is a weenie, but it may just be possible he knows nothing at all about the history
of those who have served on the Supreme Court. He actually seems like a dim bulb to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. his days are numbered. We here in MA don't intend for this fiasco to be repeated EVER AGAIN.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I hope you are right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC