Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a question for the more economically astute...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 11:40 AM
Original message
I have a question for the more economically astute...
I am putting it in this forum, because it relates to the President. The unemployment rates for state workers here in Iowa has a LOT to do with early retirement packages that were offered. They will be hiring new workers but of course at a beginning wage.

I know the last unemployment numbers last week has a spike in unemployment of government workers, while the private sector gained jobs.

Besides the wind down of the census workers.. would early retirements in other states account for more of the government workers losses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. No
Retirees do not count towards the unemployed because they are no longer in the labor market. The unemployed (at least in order to be counted) have to be actively seeking a job AND had to have been involuntarily removed from their last job within an arbitrary time frame (generally within one year before the government starts calling you a discouraged worker and removes you from the rolls of the unemployed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Everyone I know that retired early applied for unemployment comp &
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 12:44 PM by TexasProgresive
got it. They are required to seek employment but nobody is hiring so they collect up to 400 a week.


Robert Heinlein wrote: You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their emotions quicker than you can convince one man by logic. It doesn't have to be a prejudice about an important matter either. Zebadiah Jones from If This Goes On AKA Revolt in 2100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interesting
I (thankfully) haven't been unemployed for about 15 years. It used to be that early retirees couldn't claim unemployment, although it varies by state. What state are you in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Texas
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are you serious? They agreed to retire early, yet are allowed
to collect unemployment? Or were they forced to retire early?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's what I was thinking...
if forced into early retirement, that's considerably different than retiring after say 30 years w/o pressure to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Considerably; I hope the poster clears that up. And even if
someone retires early, they aren't usually forced, but asked. That might have changed-I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They took incentive packages and, yes, got to file for unemployment. n/t
I think the state looks at it that they are unemployed and were not terminated. I don't know the reasoning but it is certainly the rule with my retired friends - one came by to visit and said with the extension voted in he was to start up again and get some payments retroactively.

The upshot is that they retired, went to the employment commission and filed for unemployment compensation and received it.

Robert Heinlein wrote: You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their emotions quicker than you can convince one man by logic. It doesn't have to be a prejudice about an important matter either. Zebadiah Jones from If This Goes On AKA Revolt in 2100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If they weren't terminated, then they didn't retire. I cannot figure

out what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well yes they are terminated in that their employment ended.
Edited on Mon Aug-09-10 05:47 AM by TexasProgresive
THey met the requirements according to the union contract to receive pension funds due them and then they applied for unemployment compensation as they are no longer employed. It's really quite simple.


Robert Heinlein wrote: You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their emotions quicker than you can convince one man by logic. It doesn't have to be a prejudice about an important matter either. Zebadiah Jones from If This Goes On AKA Revolt in 2100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. It does and it doesn't
There are two main stats that get released the first Friday of every month. The unemployment rate and the number of payrolls.

Someone retiring isn't going to impact the unemployment rate because they have left the labor force and are not looking to be employed. (Unless they look for work after they retire from their government position, but let's assume they don't do that.)

Now the payroll report measures the number of actual jobs. So if the hypothetical person retires and the job is NOT filled with someone else, that counts as a lost job. If the person retires and the job gets filled with someone else, there is no impact on payrolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC