With the 2010 election less than three months away, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs' finger-in-the-eye remarks about the "professional left" could hardly have come at a worse time. After all, it is the first lesson of Politics 101 that successful politicians energize rather than alienate their base. Yet here we have Gibbs mocking progressives as the kind of people who won't be satisfied until "we have Canadian health care and have eliminated the Pentagon." Then, when given the opportunity two days later to distance himself from his remarks when CBS's Chip Reed asked, "Did you put your foot in your mouth," Gibbs shot back, "I think I have both feet firmly planted on the floor."
So progressives -- many of whom are already upset by the Obama administration's escalation of the war in Afghanistan, its refusal to fight for a public option in health care, its failure to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and to close Guantanamo, its loosening of the rules on offshore drilling, and what is perceived as its excessively solicitous stance towards Wall Street -- now have still another reason to feel unenthusiastic about the fall election. Yet when asked on Wednesday whether progressives might stay home in November, Gibbs seemed casually confident that they would not.
In truth, turnout is always a problem in midterm elections. In contrast to presidential elections, when turnout typically exceeds 50 percent of the voting-age population, congressional election year turnouts are always under 40 percent; since 1972, when 18 year olds first voted, the average turnout for presidential elections has been 53 percent, compared to 37 percent for congressional elections -- a 16-point gap. But midterm elections not only have lower turnout; Those who vote tend to be older and of higher socioeconomic status -- an ominous pattern for the Democrats, who benefited from unusually strong support from the young and from low-income voters in the 2008 election.
Midterm elections are usually unfriendly to the party of the incumbent president; over the course of the past 17 midterm elections, the party in the White House has lost an average of 28 seats in the House of Representatives. But 2010 could be much worse for the Democrats than the typical midterm election because of the much-discussed "enthusiasm gap" between the parties...
...One additional source of the Obama administration's problems -- one that extends well beyond its difficulties with progressives -- is the widespread perception that its policies have often taken the side of Wall Street over the interests of ordinary people.
...This is a toxic political environment for the Obama administration, and it is one in which it can ill afford to take pot shots at progressives -- the very people whose votes, money, and enthusiasm helped propell Obama to victory first in the primaries over Hillary Clinton and then in the November election. But there is something that President Obama can do that would simultaneously help mend his strained relations with progressives and counter the popular perception that he is too cozy with Wall Street. He could immediately appoint Elizabeth Warren, who reportedly met with White House officials on Thursday, to lead the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jerome-karabel/robert-gibbs-elizabeth-wa_b_681858.html(This is precisely why they
have to make the appointment even if the ruling economic cabel would prefer that they wouldn't. If they painted themselves into t a corner before- now they've painted themselves to the edge of a cliff).
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
