Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FUCK POLITICO!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 12:58 PM
Original message
FUCK POLITICO!
As disgusting as this whole manufactured controversy about the "Ground Zero Mosque" is, I find equally disgusting that Politico decides that the whole thing should be covered as a political controversy. Their front page article is all about how the president's statement is going to make vulnerable Dems "skittish," and is filled to the brim with quotes from Republican strategists about how "this won't play in Peoria," and "this is another nail in the Dems' coffin."

POLITICO: Obama's mosque comments put issue in national spotlight

President Barack Obama’s endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque has transformed an emotion-laden local dispute in New York into a nationwide debate overnight, setting nervous Democrats on edge and creating potentially dramatic political implications in the upcoming midterm elections.

Key Republicans think the president bought himself some political trouble by using his White House bully pulpit to announce his support for a controversial plan to build an Islamic center just blocks from nearly 3,000 people died in Manhattan at the hands of Islamic extremists on 9/11.

“Those headlines are not going to play well in Peoria,” said one GOP congressional aide, who called Obama’s remarks “a provocative act.”


FUCK YOU POLITICO. Not everything is about political tactics. This isn't a fucking game. This is about civil rights and the Constitution. Fuck off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Politico is toxic. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well said.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. goodness gracious, do you feel that way about DADT and DOMA and Choice?
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:02 PM by boston bean
I only wish Obama was as concerned about those civil rights?

I agree with you when you say this:

"Not everything is about political tactics."

but it's not very pragmatic is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree with you on those things
But why does have to do with him doing the right thing in this case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I just wondered how YOU felt.
As you have the word pragmatist in your s/n.

Most pragmatists on DU are willing to let those issues continue or delayed out of political strategy.

I'm glad you agree.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. what are your thoughts on hospital visitation rights for gays
that Obama passed recently?

Are you counting the progress as well as what is still to be done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, I think it's great.
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:08 PM by boston bean
How would you feel if Obama didn't say what he said about the mosque.

Would you have been willing to let it slide in knowing it might be harmful to him politically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I don't see an executive order on the mosque
Do you?

Yes he feels that strongly on those issues. But like the mosque, there are laws and courts and a process that civil rights and civil rights legislation goes through.

Get it yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. So, it wasn't really so hard for him to do. Is that what you're saying.
And because there are some obstacles, I don't necessarily agree with that, re DADT (an executive order would come in quite handy) or Choice! It is the law of the land. DOMA, that is more difficult, I will agree.

But anyhoot. Have a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Is There An Executive Order on the mosque?
That's what you say he should do on DADT and DOMA. Did he write one for the mosque?

If not, then he did the same thing for all of them. Uses the bully pulpit to continue pressing for equal rights.

As for choice, he specifically met with Stupak in order to keep the same reproductive rights women have had through federal health care programs for decades. And he did do that. The high risk pool has the exact same protections as Medicaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Politico=Human Waste.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is how the press covers everything. The fact that the President is right and courageous is
completely irrelevant. All that matters is "how will this play politically".

Another example - Mark Halprin:

HALPERINS' TAKE: Leaving aside the substance involved and the president's decision to weigh in on a matter the White House had stayed away from, this move has the potential to impact the midterm elections and even Obama's re-election. And/but as with many such things in our politico-media culture (even moments involving strong emotion and serious issues, as in this case) the ultimate level of impact will depend as much on who controls the semiotics and the image-making over the next 96 hours as on anything else. So put aside your August Frisbee and watch very closely.

http://thepage.time.com/2010/08/14/obama-our-commitment-to-religious-freedom-must-be-unshakeable/


This is why completely wrong BS is what the entire press covers. It is like the Death Panel crap. Who cares that it is a total lie & smear started by Palin - what are the political implications... Oh, hey,it's a winner for her and a loser for the President and Democrats... blah blah blah

What exactly do they think their f#$king jobs are as journalists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yep.....Politico is demonstrating exactly why it was started up on the web to begin with....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'll give them two fuck yous.....
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:24 PM by movonne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. On twitter, all day, they've been transparently trying to stoke the controversy.
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:35 PM by jefferson_dem
Bottom-feeding fuckers.

Thankfully, many are setting the record straight (not that they will listen).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Their latest ridiculosity....
PANAMA CITY BEACH, Fla. – With criticism mounting of his support for the construction of an Islamic center two blocks from Ground Zero in Manhattan, President Barack Obama on Saturday defended his decision to wade into the controversy the night before, but backed off from his previous stance.

"In this country we treat everybody equally and in accordance with the law, regardless of race, regardless of religion,” Obama said when asked about his remarks at a White House dinner Friday marking the start of Ramadan. He did, however, insist that his defense of the organizers' right to build the mosque did not mean he endorsed the project..

“I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” Obama continued. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That's what our country is about. And I think it's very important as difficult as some of these issues are that we stay focused on who we are as a people and what our values are all about."

Families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as well as prominent Republicans, have criticized Obama for saying Friday that he supports building a mosque near Ground Zero.

On Friday night Obama took a much sharper stance on the issue.

“Ground Zero is, indeed, hallowed ground,” he said. “But let me be clear: as a citizen and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.” -- CAROL E. LEE.

http://www.politico.com/politico44/wbarchive/whiteboard08142010.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oy.
What he said today is perfectly consistent with what he said last night.

That being said, I think his wording was poor - he was simply trying to state that they have a legal right to build there, and that's what this country is about, but by saying that he wasn't commenting on the location itself, he should have realized that the press would run with it and spin it as "Obama backtracking."

Political pundits have to be some of the most useless people on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. If vulnerable Dems are "skittish" about religious freedom, fuck them too.
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 01:51 PM by Phx_Dem
This entire controvery is the most absurd thing I have ever heard. With repect to the families and survivors of 911, NYC is filled with muslims. You can't walk down the street with seeing one. So why does a Community Center stir their ire and make the pain of losing a loved one more pronounced? I don't get it, but I think it has more to do with intolerance and hate than pain of losing a loved one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The Daily Show had a great segment showing all the Halal carts around Ground Zero
Seriously, the Halal Cart has completely displaced the hot dog vendors as NYC's street food cart of choice. Why aren't Halal Carts in Lower Manhattan "insensitive" to the feelings of the victims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Exactly. Muslim cab drivers, Halal carts and middle eastern restaurants
located all over Manhattan aren't insensitive, but a community center is. Go figure. Sounds like an excuse for hate to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yesterday, Alan Grayson called Politico a RW "rag" on Ed Schultz's show. Ed seemed to
disagree, with repeated questions to Grayson if he considers Politico to be "legitimate." Ed obviously DOES think Politico is a legitimate, unbiased news source. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. They should talk! Politico is owned by Allbritton family - owned banks that funded the 9/11 attack.
Edited on Sat Aug-14-10 02:06 PM by leveymg
See the thread here for details about Allbritton's ties to Bush and a string of Saudi controlled banks: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=495105&mesg_id=495168
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DimplesinMI Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Politico is FOX NEWS on the Web..........
The sooner that people get that, the smarter they will be..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Grayson said something similar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R I'm going to repeat it... FUCK YOU POLITICO... Fuck off.
Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Who. Cares.
Obama did the right thing.

And Republicans are never right about anything anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. The elites have to give the Proles another 2-Minute Hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Politico is Drudge's younger, more handsome straight brother who wears cheap suits
They have been in cahoots for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Agree 100%
"FUCK YOU POLITICO. Not everything is about political tactics. This isn't a fucking game. This is about civil rights and the Constitution. Fuck off. "

This pretty much sums up how I feel about this. Politico is to politics as TMZ is to entertainment. Yet unlike TMZ, politico actually takes itself seriously and pretends to be a legitimate media organization. They are culprit #1 in the wide-ranging attempt to turn our political dialogue in this country into nothing more than easily absorbed and intelectually dishonest narratives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC