Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House's case to voters on the economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 10:44 AM
Original message
The White House's case to voters on the economy
The White House's case to voters on the economy

So how will the White House make the case to individual voters that Obama's economic policies are working for them? How tough a sell is it?

President Obama met with an Ohio family at their kitchen table today to talk to them about the economy, and their situation is worth noting, because it provides a close up look at the answer to that question.

The White House just sent out some info on the family: They are Rhonda and Joe Weithman, Ohio natives who live with their two children in Columbus, which is smack in the middle of the Rust Belt I-70 corridor that will be a critical battleground in the midterm elections. Joe owns a small architecture firm that lost business during the recession. Here's the White House argument as to how Obama policies helped this family:

COBRA Subsidies from the Recovery Act: The Recovery Act established a 65 percent tax credit subsidy for COBRA health insurance benefits for involuntary unemployed workers. Rhonda benefited from these subsidies after she was laid off from her job. This tied her over until she went to work for her husband and was covered under his plan.

Investments in Local Infrastructure: Joe runs an architecture firm with five employees. He was able to keep two of their employees that otherwise would have been laid off due to work on a police station renovation that received infrastructure funding. Joe is hopeful that he will hire an additional employee as the economy continues to improve and additional projects, some of which could be funded by the Recovery Act, are secured.

Pre-existing Conditions: With the passage of health care reform, if the Weithman's shop for new insurance, their son will be able to get health care coverage despite his pre-existing condition. The new law includes new rules to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to children under the age of 19 due to a pre-existing condition.

What you're seeing here is a ground-level example of the White House case: Without us, things would be much worse for you today, and amid all your hardship, our policies have helped you in isolated, but palpable, ways. The larger context for this, of course, is that new AP poll this morning finding that approval of Obama's handling of the economy is at 41 percent, a new low.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/the_white_houses_case_to_voter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pay no attention to the bankers million dollar bonus
We helped you in "palpable ways". We made it easier for you to buy insurance that you can't really afford. We're giving you a tax credit on the income you're not earning. You only had to lay off 3 employees not five. The bankers? Um.... I think they're really struggling too, out on the Hamptons, in their second "summer" house. See, their bonuse came first, and from your tax dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. +1
And get ready to be flamed for speaking the truth. I just wish we had progressive democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those things are great, but not sufficient. 'It's the economy stupid.'
Edited on Wed Aug-18-10 11:08 AM by flpoljunkie
The Democrats need to do something, and do it when they come back in September, or the mid-terms losses may be huge.

Robert Reich's idea to eliminate the payroll tax for the first $20,000 for two years and pay for it by lifting the ceiling on those who earn over $250,000 is a great one.

Democrats must also do more to help the foreclosure crisis. Heard one suggestion to drop those mortgage loans that are underwater to a rate to 4% and, of course, there's always cramdown, but, of course, the bank lobbyists would go into overdrive to fight cramdown.

Dems ignore the economic pain at their electoral peril. Make the Republicans vote against these things. People will see who is 'on their side' and who is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The massive refi program is being proposed by bond guru Bill Gross of PIMCO
He thinks we could bring in 50-60 billion by lowering the mortgage rate of people who are current with their freddie and fannie backed mortgages. If they are underwater fannie and freddie are on the hook anyway so no harm refinancing there. The biggest hit will be to bondholders who are getting a higher rate but will be paid back and cant get as good a yield.

So the treasury doesnt lose much except maybe an incentive bonus to refinance, people who can pay their mortgage will have more disposable income to spend and this will be benefit the middle class because the truly wealthy have Jumbo loans so they arent eligible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, that's it. Thanks much for the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think that the tarp money being used to bail out foreign
banks is real hard to understand from families dealing with a jobless recovery. I hope they are able to get that money back for the unemployed and start a zero tolerance program for unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Things could have been a lot worse is a lousy motto. I don't believe it is a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree. Ir's weak. Dems must do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC