Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cognitive Dissonance In Alaska-sarah, care to address this?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:30 AM
Original message
Cognitive Dissonance In Alaska-sarah, care to address this?
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025272.php


COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN ALASKA.... It's mildly annoying that Alaska is the beneficiary of extraordinary generosity from the federal government. But what truly rankles is the disconnect between the state's handouts and its political attitudes.

Backed by a blue row of saw-toothed mountain peaks, the Republican state lawmaker Carl Gatto finds himself on a fine roll.

Roll it back, he says, roll back this entire socialistic experiment in federal hegemony. Give us control of our land, let us drill and mine, and please don't let a few belugas get in the way of a perfectly good bridge.

"I've introduced legislation to roll back the federal government," he says. "They don't have solutions; they just have taxes."

And what of the federal stimulus, from which Alaska receives the most money per capita in the nation? Would he reject it?

Mr. Gatto, 72 and wiry, smiles and shakes his head: "I'll give the federal government credit: they sure give us a ton of money. For every $1 we give them in taxes for highways, they give us back $5.76."

He points to a newly graded and federally financed highway, stretching toward distant spruce trees. "Man, beautiful, right?"


Well, "beautiful" is not the first adjective that comes to mind.

The Last Frontier enjoys more federal largess than any other state. The Recovery Act delivered $3,145 per capita to Alaska, which wasn't just the highest in the nation, but was also nearly triple the national average. All told, a third of Alaska's jobs are supported by federal tax dollars, and the trend is accelerating -- in 1996, the NYT noted, Alaska's share of federal spending was 38% above the national average. Today, it's 71%.

Putting aside merit, the funds flowing into Alaska would be less annoying if the state's political culture was more aware of the reality. While the state accepts big federal checks with one hand, it seems to shake its fist at D.C. with the other: "{T}he Republican governor decries 'intrusive' Obama administration policies, officials sue to overturn the health care legislation and Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican, voted against the stimulus bill."

Indeed, as we've talked about before, there's a bit of a "feature, not a bug" problem here. Alaska abolished both income and sales taxes, which made the state even more dependent on pork-barrel spending from Congress.

Something to consider the next time conservative Alaskan politicians -- including you know who -- offer lectures about big government, cutting spending, and an intrusive federal reach.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. "I'll cognitive diss ya! Refudiate these remarks!
Refudiate them, or I'll reload, you betcha'!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let all those 'Rugged Individualists' pay their own way.
Grant their deepest wish, and let them see how long they last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. you are hearing from the psychos. the rest of us know better. and
we only have 8K miles of road in our whole state. that is why so many fly - and crash. try living in your state with 8k miles of roads. total. in a state three times bigger than texas. that is 3k miles long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. First, you're going to have to explain to Palin what "dissonance" means.
Also, "cognitive." And maybe "address." She might think you want a street address.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC