Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems should make Westboro Baptist Church a big issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:47 PM
Original message
Dems should make Westboro Baptist Church a big issue
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 06:55 PM by Onlooker
This could be a great wedge issue. Most Americans agree that picketing funerals of soldiers and even Reagan (let alone gays), is repulsive and should not be allowed. This is a great issue with which to point out that sometimes the Constitution does not work perfectly in light of modern realities. While some people may back the right of assembly under all circumstances, I think the average person would say there has to be some limits somewhere, and certainly restricting the right to protest at funerals seems like a reasonable limit. Our founders surely would have addressed this issue if they ever conceived that people would be so cruel as Phelps and his gang. If the Dems raise this issue, I think it will cause a lot of problems for Libertarians, conservatives, and Tea Baggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Totally disagree.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 06:51 PM by PeaceNikki
In addition to questioning fundamental rights over a handful of assholes, why give them airtime or any acknowledgement at all? They're insignificant fuckfaces who mean nothing to anyone.

Fuck 'em. Right in the ear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. So, you're on the side of Scalia, Roberts, Alito, and Thomas? LOL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I suppose I am on this issue
fuck off, also, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Scalia Also Said "Flag Burning Is Protected Speech"
Should we oppose him on that too.

What other amendments beside the First should we oppose to garner a few votes?


BTW, I would think you could come up with "disturbing the peace" and "disorderly conduct" statutes that would pass judicial muster and curtail the Westboro Church nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Ginsburg and Breyer likely would go that way too.
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 06:31 PM by Chan790
Ginsburg is a former ACLU and WRP litigator.
Breyer is a classically-liberal jurist.

Both are historically staunch and resolute on speech protections. This is not a winner for Democrats as a policy position. You'd have emotionally-advocated the wrong position on Skokie too, I'm assuming?

Free speech protections should be as close to absolute as possible. Here I'm willing to say I'm firmly in the same camp as Scalia, Roberts, Alito, and Thomas because I'm also in the same camp as some people I respect deeply including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Nadine Strossen and Larry Lessig. (I'd love to see the last two on SCOTUS some day.)

Edit: U not E.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Constitution was 1789 and I don't see this as anything that could or should be used politically.
The Phelps gang speaks for themselves. No one supports their nonsense even if they do defend their right to protest. I am not comfortable trying to make political hay out of something like this. It is unseemly and would not show a lot of class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. So you want the Dems, often characterized as 'constitution shredders', to offer a platform
based on shredding the constitution?

Not so smart, that idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah. This ^ also, too.
Dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks! Might as well stump around on a "we're gonna make all guns illegal" platform, too.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And Bibles, too. Oooh, don't forget the Death Panels.
I would like to serve a term on that panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. and making Islam the required national religion while simultaneously making atheism the only legal
belief system based on a purely scientific, evolutionary, material objectionist viewpoint, praise be Allah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Forced gay marriage. Mandatory abortions. Marxist reeducation camps.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Government control of corporations. National uniforms. Pres. for Life Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. You'll be automatically subscribed and payment will be taken from your nationalized income check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd rather link the fundamentalist republican teabaggers with the Phelps people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why? The Phelps people are all Democrats.
Ironically, they are a family of Civil Rights lawyers. Fred Phelps ran for governor as Democrat more than once and his son Fred Jr. was a delegate and fundraiser for Al Gore.

Not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I agree.
All we'd be doing is bringing attention to the fact that some Democrats are assholes, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. So, you're defending them?
Democrats have a great and proud history of rejecting their Dixiecrats and others bigots. Nothing wrong with the Democrats urging the Phelps crowd to join the Republicans, where there's a better fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He's not defending them. He's simply saying it's a bad idea to shed a light on them.
It's a terrible and dumb idea and you're accusing people who doesn't agree with you of being something they aren't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. The Phelps Are Welcome To Join The Republicants
But these clowns believed Jerry Falwell was too far left.

BTW, we drove the Dixiecrats out of the party or they left. We didn't take away their Constitutional rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Westboro church
These people probably want to take away our free speech.I only hope the supreme court is smart enough to answer this question in a Soloman -like way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nobody thinks the Westboro baptist church should be doing what they are doing
They are repulsive to the nth degree. Unfortunately, they have the right to do it, no matter how repulsive it is. If the Dems wanted to make it an issue, they should have done it with the BushCo free speech zones when protesters were fenced into a specific area away from everybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. "they should have done it with the BushCo free speech zones"
Exactly right!

In the most ironic of ways, the first amendment was designed for dumb-asses like Phelps and klan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. I kind of like the Westboro Baptist Church.
They make Christians look like idiots.

I certainly don't support restricting their free speech rights just because I disagree with their message.

Let them shout it from the roof-tops -- only makes them look like fools, and turns people off to what they are saying.

And there's nothing stopping people from counter-protesting. Free speech/assembly works both ways, don't fuck with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC