Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel: Untangling DADT from US Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:32 PM
Original message
Rachel: Untangling DADT from US Law
Rachel talks with Walter Dellinger, former Solicitor General re: today's events on the DADT front. Agree or disagree with the administration's handling of the matter, this is yet another Rachel Maddow "must watch" TV segment ...

Video
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#39679402
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agree. A good explanation from a real expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anything/everything on the subject is helpful
as long as it comes from her show. Best thing on tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. We need more Rachel Maddows in this party....
.... no blind faith ... no unrealistic expectations.

Also .... SHE READS STUFF. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Even when she is upset, she looks for the reasons and logic instead of just running with her
feelings of outrage. She still says why she is outraged or upset or frustrated (which is honest instead of the phony "I'm totally objective" crap) but she doesn't let it cloud and take over her entire view.

She doesn't automatically assume the worst motives of people she knows to generally be her allies. There is way to much of that going on. It is understandable but also destructive.

Cable News - all news - needs more of that and less of the screaming outrage - @#$*!!! - because just maybe there is a logical reason for what they are doing and we just don't know it yet. Perhaps there are people who could explain it. OMG!!! What an idea.

I love Rachel. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly.
She's the anti-Ed Shultz (lol and in your case, the anti-Tweety.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Me and Tweety? Are you talking about my frequent irritated Tweets about Tweety?
Edited on Fri Oct-15-10 12:45 PM by Pirate Smile
I give him props when he does good too. :)

At least I can actually tweet at Rachel - I asked her this today: What would the Unemployment rate be without the Auto Rescue & the Recovery Act?4/5/6 mil more?

People talk about the two of them separately but it would be good to know how many jobs were saved just by those two things. I want a segment on it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. great post, agree 100% n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
The interview was VERY informative. I'm somewhat surprised that it's not getting more attention here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. from the little i've watched, i think it goes against what most here wants thus lack of attention nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kick - I just watched it. I'm glad someone is explaining the legal reasons for what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks very much. Missed her last night.
Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC