|
I think that star Democrats can draw crowds almost entirely of the faithful. They are useful in terms of getting some people out and possibly motivated to work in their communities. It also gives a one day positive news story - not something to sneeze about.
However, I suspect that their ability to transfer whatever popularity they have to a candidate is limited. A good example of that is the MA Senate race. Both Obama and Clinton came to MA to help Coakley in the last few days of the campaign. Senator Kerry went out about a week after hip surgery to have a few rallies for her. All three were met with cheers, but Brown won - with only slightly more votes than McCain had when he lost. Kerry in 2008 got nearly twice the number that Brown had. A significant number of democrats stayed home - in spite of the appeals from these men.
From comments of WI Duers, I wonder if Feingold will end the race with an ad where he references the principles he cited when he first ran - and spoke of how - through all the years - he followed them - emphasizing that he is independent, answering to only his conscience and the voters. There are few long term politicians who can convincingly say that - and he is one. If WI wants an independent, fiscal conservative, non-corporate Senator, all they have to do is look at their current Senator. He is all those things. The race, if won, will be won because at the moment of truth, WI voters remember why they liked (and even more, respected) him in the first place.
|