Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Caribou Barbie speaks, via FaceBook. "Journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:14 AM
Original message
Caribou Barbie speaks, via FaceBook. "Journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel"
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 07:17 AM by jefferson_dem
If you're interested.

America's Enduring Strength
.by Sarah Palin on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 3:52am.

Please click here to view the video of this statement.



Like millions of Americans I learned of the tragic events in Arizona on Saturday, and my heart broke for the innocent victims. No words can fill the hole left by the death of an innocent, but we do mourn for the victims’ families as we express our sympathy.



I agree with the sentiments shared yesterday at the beautiful Catholic mass held in honor of the victims. The mass will hopefully help begin a healing process for the families touched by this tragedy and for our country.



Our exceptional nation, so vibrant with ideas and the passionate exchange and debate of ideas, is a light to the rest of the world. Congresswoman Giffords and her constituents were exercising their right to exchange ideas that day, to celebrate our Republic’s core values and peacefully assemble to petition our government. It’s inexcusable and incomprehensible why a single evil man took the lives of peaceful citizens that day.



There is a bittersweet irony that the strength of the American spirit shines brightest in times of tragedy. We saw that in Arizona. We saw the tenacity of those clinging to life, the compassion of those who kept the victims alive, and the heroism of those who overpowered a deranged gunman.



Like many, I’ve spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and praying for guidance. After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event.



President Reagan said, “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.



The last election was all about taking responsibility for our country’s future. President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process. Two years ago his party was victorious. Last November, the other party won. In both elections the will of the American people was heard, and the peaceful transition of power proved yet again the enduring strength of our Republic.



Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions. And after the election, we shake hands and get back to work, and often both sides find common ground back in D.C. and elsewhere. If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision. If you don’t like their ideas, you’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.



There are those who claim political rhetoric is to blame for the despicable act of this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal. And they claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated? Back in those “calm days” when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols? In an ideal world all discourse would be civil and all disagreements cordial. But our Founding Fathers knew they weren’t designing a system for perfect men and women. If men and women were angels, there would be no need for government. Our Founders’ genius was to design a system that helped settle the inevitable conflicts caused by our imperfect passions in civil ways. So, we must condemn violence if our Republic is to endure.



As I said while campaigning for others last March in Arizona during a very heated primary race, “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.” Yes, our debates are full of passion, but we settle our political differences respectfully at the ballot box – as we did just two months ago, and as our Republic enables us to do again in the next election, and the next. That’s who we are as Americans and how we were meant to be. Public discourse and debate isn’t a sign of crisis, but of our enduring strength. It is part of why America is exceptional.



No one should be deterred from speaking up and speaking out in peaceful dissent, and we certainly must not be deterred by those who embrace evil and call it good. And we will not be stopped from celebrating the greatness of our country and our foundational freedoms by those who mock its greatness by being intolerant of differing opinion and seeking to muzzle dissent with shrill cries of imagined insults.



Just days before she was shot, Congresswoman Giffords read the First Amendment on the floor of the House. It was a beautiful moment and more than simply “symbolic,” as some claim, to have the Constitution read by our Congress. I am confident she knew that reading our sacred charter of liberty was more than just “symbolic.” But less than a week after Congresswoman Giffords reaffirmed our protected freedoms, another member of Congress announced that he would propose a law that would criminalize speech he found offensive.



It is in the hour when our values are challenged that we must remain resolved to protect those values. Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. And so it is today.



Let us honor those precious lives cut short in Tucson by praying for them and their families and by cherishing their memories. Let us pray for the full recovery of the wounded. And let us pray for our country. In times like this we need God’s guidance and the peace He provides. We need strength to not let the random acts of a criminal turn us against ourselves, or weaken our solid foundation, or provide a pretext to stifle debate.



America must be stronger than the evil we saw displayed last week. We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy. We will come out of this stronger and more united in our desire to peacefully engage in the great debates of our time, to respectfully embrace our differences in a positive manner, and to unite in the knowledge that, though our ideas may be different, we must all strive for a better future for our country. May God bless America.



- Sarah Palin


http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=487510653434


It might be worth a click ... for the comments, some of which are really tasty. Palin's "comment deletion machine" is working overtime.

Oh, here's a video - http://vimeo.com/18698532
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Begging the question re. issue of crosshairs on her site.
Her past incidiary words.

She can't cover up her history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sedona Donating Member (715 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. How is it?
that a woman who can't put two coherent sentences together when she speaks can put a 500+ word grammatically correct essay together?

There's no F'ing way she wrote that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. exactly what I was thinking
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 07:32 AM by freeplessinseattle
just checked out the comments, they are entertaining, and right away found one of her brainiac fans: "...losing are freedoms....We shouldn't coward from our passion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Victim Queen apportions blame, issues herself pardon and absolution...and invokes 9-11
"the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame"

"not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle"

"within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible."

"There are those who claim political rhetoric is to blame for the despicable act of this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal."

"When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.”

"and seeking to muzzle dissent with shrill cries of imagined insults."

"Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. And so it is today."

"We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. she can go to Hell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. She could have never written those words
her vocabulary is too limited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Palin supporters = useful idiots nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Do they ever write anything without bringing Reagan into the text?
He must have really impressed the Repugs. Of course, his ability to read the words of others probably overwhelmed them with his intelligence and wit.

Who was his speech writer during his presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Or 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Blood libel - "false accusation or claim that religious minorities, almost always Jews, murder..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I am unfamiliar with this term and now that it has been explained, I wonder
who are the people she surrounds herself with that would write this sort of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. In typical fashion, she pilfered it from other RWNJs who have been tossing it around lately.
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 08:40 AM by jefferson_dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. The more the right protests, the more it appears they believe they're guilty as sin. n/t
-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. Rep. Giffords expressed concern re Palin's targeting of her after the healthcare vote. Palin ignores
this--accepts no responsibility for her rhetoric or her (which Palin removed from her website on Saturday after the shooting ramage in Tucson, Arizona) which targets those Democrats who voted for the healthcare bill. Giffords said members of Congress had never seen anything like this (response to passage of the health care bill) in twenty or thirty years.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8oQi1ty1hs

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' warnings about the consequences of irresponsible rhetoric--particularly Palin's map--begins about 1:55 into the 4:55 minute video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. The interview of Congresswoman Giffords regarding
the above ad speaks volumes.

Also, the one for target practice with Kelly.

I see this morning the media is turning to on the Palin and heated rhetoric not to blame. Bull!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The right's echo chamber worked very hard to demonize 'Obamacare' and those who voted for it.
And they did it all to protect the profits of the healthcare industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. And Timed Perfectly To Pre-empt President Obama's Remark's He Will Make Today......
I'm sure whomever wrote this for Palin thought about what would Obama say in such a situation and chose to include some of those same statements. We all know that Palin didn't write this herself. We all know that if someone asked her a straight up question about any one of the statements made in this essay - that she wouldn't be able to answer it.

I think we all knew that this was coming as well.

Too many of the left wing pundits kept saying her 'silence was deafening'.

Now that she supposedly spoke up - I can't wait to see the discussion now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Don't retreat reload Sarah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. Horribly boring, disjointed, defensive....
...typical Caribou Barbie. A "blood libel"? Please.

Still, it was a mistake to try to blame Palin for anything at all to do with this assassination attempt. Many people right here on DU have been doing this - even going so far as to claim she should be arrested. As it becomes obvious to all that Laughner was almost certainly an untreated paranoid schizophrenic with no real political motivations - right or left, Palin is probably going to start getting a ton of sympathy from the media for all the fingers that were pointed at her far too early. Over the long term, she is likely to emerge from this stronger than weaker, and as a figure who was deeply unfairly treated and deserving of a long period of deference. She will end up being more obnoxious than ever - and have free license to do so.

This assassination was almost certainly not due to the "tone of the debate" or Palin's ridiculous target list, or anything blowhards like Beck or Limbaugh ever had to say. Period. Prematurely blaming her or anyone else was stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I disagree. Shooter didn't develop extreme rage against Giffords in a vacuum
You cannot convince me that the overheated right wing opposition to Giffords over the past couple of years did not influence him to make her the target for his aggression instead of his college or somewhere else. He most certainly witnessed the vitriolic demonstrations against Gifford either directly on the streets or on TV and had been exposed to hateful comments from people there. Is it just a coincidence that he bought the weapon after she was narrowly re-elected, enraging a large and vocal segment of the population there? While he may not have been directly influenced by Palin, Beck or Limbaugh, he was exposed to a corrosive atmosphere in Tucson due to right wing extremists whose anti-Gifford mentality was certainly directly fueled by rhetoric from Palin, Beck and Limbaugh etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. How would you know that?
"I disagree. Shooter didn't develop extreme rage against Giffords in a vacuum"

If Laughner is, as I strongly suspect, an untreated paranoid schizophrenic, then yes he most certainly could very well have developed a twisted rage in a vacuum. Hinckley shot Reagan thinking he could woo a Hollywood actress by his actions - neither the "the tone of the debate" or any "corrosive atmosphere" had anything whatsoever to do with it. There is every chance that Laughner was even more mentally deranged than Hinckley.

"Is it just a coincidence that he bought the weapon after she was narrowly re-elected, enraging a large and vocal segment of the population there?"

You mean the election he cared so little about that he didn't even vote? Yes, if we are dealing with a paranoid schizophrenic it could most certainly be a complete coincidence. His descent into madness may well have just peaked at that time.

"he was exposed to a corrosive atmosphere in Tucson due to right wing extremists whose anti-Gifford mentality was certainly directly fueled by rhetoric from Palin, Beck and Limbaugh etc."

How do you know that? How do you know he had the slightest interest or clue about any right wing rhetoric swirling around the district. It certainly didn't interest him enough to vote. It apparently didn't interest him enough to talk about or link to anything about Palin, the teabaggers, crybaby Beck, etc. There is every reason to believe he didn't have much of a clue what any of them were saying, and wouldn't have cared anyway.

By your logic, we could indict violent video games, violent movies, etc, because they "expose people to a corrosive atmosphere" of violence. And believe me, those who hate violent video games, movies, etc, will almost certainly make that exact boneheaded argument.

Laughner is going to turn out to be seriously mentally ill, and his motives are likely to be disjointed and bizarre and affected by phantoms in his own mind. Trying to blame his actions on Palin or anyone else is a fools errand and, I've thought from the beginning, almost certain to backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Does it matter that some of the "premature blame", as you
define it, came from Gabrielle herself? We have video footage of an interview with her, just after the release of that crosshairs map, where she expresses her own concern about being named on that list and a reference to some of the threats against her to that point.

Maybe she should apologize to Mooselini for getting shot. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. That isn't the point...
The crosshairs map can be totally obnoxious and inappropriate and yet have absolutely nothing at all to do with this assassination attempt. You can't point fingers at someone and blame them for a massacre without actual evidence whatsoever linking them. Now that this has been done in some quarters, if no such evidence ever emerges, Palin is going to become a sympathetic media character claiming she was wrongly accused - and the press will treat her as exactly that.

I simply don't buy this whole "changing the tone" nonsense. The tone isn't going to change. Period. Our side stays goes on record with that bogus line of reasoning for too long and the only outcome will be that Democrats self censor to avoid looking hypocritical and the other side continues waging political war against us without pause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
21. Always shirking responsibility. Always saying the same thing.
I'm so sick of anything Palin. She has nothing new to say or add to the dialog.

All of her ranting and ravings are predictable.

The CTRL,C and V keys on her keyboard must be worn down from all of the cutting and pasting she does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Clyburn: Palin intellectually 'not to be able to understand what's going on here'
Clyburn: Palin intellectually 'not to be able to understand what's going on here'
By Michael O'Brien - 01/12/11 08:37 AM ET

A House Democratic leader on Wednesday lashed out at Sarah Palin, accusing the former Alaska governor of being intellectually unable of understanding why she's faced criticism related to the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said that Palin had missed the point by releasing a statement this morning blasting the media for "blood libel" for looking to assign blame in part to her rhetoric after the attempted assassination of Giffords last weekend.

"You know, Sarah Palin just can't seem to get it, on any front. I think she's an attractive person, she is articulate," Clyburn said on the Bill Press radio show. "But I think intellectually, she seems not to be able to understand what's going on here."

Palin broke her relative silence since the attack on Giffords, which some Democrats have said created an environment that allowed such an attack on a member of Congress. Democrats have honed in on the map Palin's PAC had released, depicting targeted lawmakers in the election with crosshairs over their district.

<SNIP>

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137411-clyburn-palin-intellectually-not-to-be-able-to-understand-whats-going-on-here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. She did not ever speak out in peaceful dissent, or is palling around with terrorists supposed to be
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 09:22 AM by Jennicut
all sunshine and roses? This woman is pathetic and her 15 minutes of fame is long overdue to end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. If U think "Blood Libel" is her words, I have a bridge in Alaska to sell you. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. BLOOD LIBEL!?!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. So glad she spoke up
It gives everyone a chance to see exactly the kind of mentality the media/Republican assholes have been defending.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
28. A couple of points
It is in the hour when our values are challenged that we must remain resolved to protect those values. Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. ( Aren't you glad we won that battle :eyes: )

In times like this we need God’s guidance and the peace He provides. ( says the Devil )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. Not only by video but by FB?! This woman shits on the face of Americans regularly.
Oh god...as of right now she's at 9000 likes. People are saying she has hints of "Reagan and Thatcher." Lalalal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
32. a lot of language use to basically say
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 11:03 AM by florida08
We can do and say anything we want short of shooting our opponents. That we leave to our followers. No you didn't pull the trigger and Loughner may not even know who you are. What you did was to inspire people to rage against the government. Saying Obama pals around with terrorists and using a map to show targets in other sovereign states who YOU say are against America. Who the hell are you to get involved in state elections? You who couldn't even finish your duty to your own state.

But now you've shown your real self. Have you rushed to Congresswoman Gifford's bedside or even contacted her husband on how sorry you are for this horror? No..no you have stayed hidden. Scared that you may just have a hand in riling people up. Now you come out to play the victim? I feel sorry for your followers. It's obvious your first thought is for yourself. If you had truly been in prayer your first thought would have been for the 18 shot. 6 of which are now dead. You didn't even mention Christina.

But then one cannot show what one does not have. Your pride is ugly but your lack of compassion is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC