Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

W.H. vows to protect net neutrality - Threatens veto of GOP effort to overturn FCC rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:19 PM
Original message
W.H. vows to protect net neutrality - Threatens veto of GOP effort to overturn FCC rules
Edited on Mon Apr-04-11 09:20 PM by jefferson_dem
W.H. vows to protect net neutrality
By: Tony Romm and Eliza Krigman
April 4, 2011 06:41 PM EDT

The Obama administration on Monday threatened to veto a Republican effort to overturn the FCC's new net neutrality rules, just as House GOPers moved one step closer to bringing that repeal to a full-chamber vote.

A Statement of Administration Policy issued late Monday emphasized that the White House “strongly opposes House passage” of the resolution of disapproval, which would roll back rules the FCC enacted in December that require Internet providers to treat all traffic equally.

The administration described any Republican attempt to undo the FCC’s work as one that would “undermine a fundamental part of the Nation’s Internet and innovation strategy — an enforceable and effective policy for keeping the Internet free and open.”

“If the President is presented with a Resolution of Disapproval that would not safeguard the free and open Internet, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the Resolution,” the statement said.

Obama’s veto threat isn’t exactly surprising, given the extent to which the so-called “Tech President” touched on net neutrality along the 2008 campaign trail.

<SNIP>

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=DFDAEC5F-8CDD-4DC1-BFB2-CC8EF0BE9ACE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. doggone corporate tools
no difference between this White House and a republican white house. None.

I know that because i've read statements to that effect (if not using those exact words) here on DU a dozen times today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Can't this be stopped in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Eric Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good, heartening news if true. Drawing a line in the sand. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Like not signing a health "care" bill without a public option in it.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's pushing back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll believe it when I see it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. But but but they VOWED it ... it's a VOW!!! Like a PINKIE PROMISE!!
They wouldn't go back on that!!!

:sarcasm:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryfirelord Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent
The internet has shaped up to be just as an important medium for free speech. When most people generally have only one ISP to choose from, the ability for them to set up a tiered network is certainly not far away. Even if you do have multiple choices, chances are the smaller ISP runs into a Tier 1 network, which is controlled by a large ISP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great-rec'd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. This will be used as a bargaining chip for the Medicaid cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
999998th word Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. probably
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 12:32 AM by 999998th word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I heard that Obama hates puppies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I heard that Obama eats puppies.
It's what they do in Kenya where he was born an atheist muslim socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Liberal Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is great news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC