Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which of these presidents has been most courageous at fighting right-wing extremism in the U.S.?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:49 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which of these presidents has been most courageous at fighting right-wing extremism in the U.S.?
Why did you vote for your choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can't I vote D) FDR? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Me, too. FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's kind of not fair, because rightwing extremism and power hasn't been a static thing
It's grown exponentially over time.

Carter looks better, but only because he wasn't dealing with nearly the same thing.

This is not to say that both Clinton and Obama have done well in that respect. They've been awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Good point.
I was aware that the point could be made; I voted for Carter anyway.

(Actually I voted for all three of them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm only running off memory here - but clintons remarks after OKC and the very
Heated response from the right has me giving it to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. 4 vs. 8 vs. 2.4 yrs
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 08:07 PM by FrenchieCat
Apples vs. oranges vs. strawberries!

No Fox or RW loonies vs. Signing the Telecommunications act that birthed Fox vs. Fox & Limbaugh in Full Bloom

This forced comparison is so shady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Thank you. Your point is on target.....why is it often ignored?
The Republicans like nothing more than to group various political situations as "the same".....especially when they are not.

Eight years of the Bush administration brought us the expense of two unneccessary wars, and tax CUTS to the richest Americans....and the Republicans said NOTHING.
Now, for the last two years, Obama has spent much of his time cleaning up after the "elephant" (so our country can move forward), and the hypocritical Republicans beat down his efforts with any contrived lie they can manufacture.

We all need to stand up to them. It is a parent (Dems) vs.child (Reps) scenario........unfortunately, at times, the child seems to be winning. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. yeah, where is our version of the tea baggers. All I hear and
see are tea baggers, where are the patriots, or whatever we want to call them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. And as I said in my thread, did either Carter or Clinton accomplish all that Obama . . .
. . .already has?

HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Such as??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Well, let's see.......
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 10:30 PM by FrenchieCat
8 years = Losing the Health Care Battle + signing DADT/DOMA + Repealing Glass-Steagall + signing telecommunications act + ignoring Rwanda + Dot Com Boom jobs but that later went bust + NAFTA + Zipper problem that brought on impeachment proceedings

vs.

2.4 years = Winning the Health Care Battle (even if we didn't get everything) + Signing DADT repeal + Signing in Financial Regulations bill (including a Financial Protection Agency) + Dealing w/t an entire ME Upheaval during the entire time that both right wing and left wing media have been on the assault against him.


as for Carter, I'm sure he accomplished a lot by his first 2.4 years in office.....problem is he didn't get re-elected, so I guess even Democrats didn't think much of whatever it was that he did at the time......although I'm sure some can refresh us on this....

ditto LBJ, who ended up choosing not to run for 2nd term based on his reading of the landscape of how little Democrats supported him. Certainly, it helped LBJ to have just replaced a deeply loved dead President, but folks know this, I'm sure.

Seems like those being called courageous against the RW ended up leaving the Presidency to a Republican. How Neato! Let's just do that again some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Accomplish, with regard to fighting right wing extremism....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Those who fight RW extremism
leave us with a Republican President.

Who was President after LBJ, after his serving only one term?
Who was President after Carter, after his serving only one term?
Clinton served his two terms, and was impeached, and then who stole the 2000 Election?

If this is how courage is repaid....where the American people are made to suffer
a Nixon, a Reagan and a Bush.....fuck that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. In your post, #25, which of those things are accomplishments in fighting RW extremism?
THis post to which I'm responding is a nonsequitur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. If you don't think that fighting RW Tbaggers to get health Care,
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 10:41 PM by FrenchieCat
and fighting RW bigots to repeal DADT,
and fighting RW Corporate interests to
get Financial Regulations passed,
than you don't know what fighting is.

Plus he had to fight the RW 24/7 hate machine and the corporate media,
and the Firedoglake Professional Left wing whiners,
all at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Funny thing is most of the fighting Carter did was after he left office...
He was such a fighter, the PL of that time couldn't wait to primary him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe LBJ
He doesn't get nearly enough credit for what he did for the Civil Rights movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. +1
Without a doubt.

He knew he was planting the seeds for a solid Republican south for generations, but went ahead and did what was right regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fighting is a strategy. Winning is what's important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Winning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. True dat!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Other than Charlie Sheen...I think winning means the middle class buoys to the top
We aren't winning. Our children's ranking is declining.

Clinton's third way was demoralizing.

Obama taking on slogans and giving away the store is depressing.

I think the best democratic movement I've seen in the last couple of years is what the protesters in Wisconsin and Ohio have done. For people in Michigan to get stirred up and head to the state house is eye opening. The midwest is not normally known as the bulwark against conspicuous conservatism, but there we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ellenor Roosevelt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. AMEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Which one had to fight racist/birthers/teabagger,
Koch brothers and Trump?

Then there is the Internets.

It's relative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. I would hope this does not mean you leave that solely to Presidents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. How the fuck is LBJ not on this list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. If I put LBJ, Kennedy, FDR ...
... the poll wouldn't have revealed anything. Sadly, since LBJ our Democratic leaders have been quite spineless. If I had asked who was the most spineless of the Democratic presidents, I am sure the moderators would have closed this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Great question. And this love affair with Carter here on DU is cracking me up.
Obviously most of the voters weren't around during his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Actually, in the defense of Carter ...
... he did make foreign human rights a central focus of US foreign policy, which it had never really been before. That said, overall he was quite conservative and anti-union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. FDR
followed by his relation: Teddy.

They don't make them like that any more---or at least, they don't let them run and win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ronald Ray-Gun and gwbush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. They didn't fight RW extremists....
they were RW extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Actually, they fought the RW extremists in their own party
who are now in charge of the House...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Well, I guess you know your Republican history better than I do!
Fascinating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. How is Carter in the lead?
While Prez, what did he ever do to fight RW extremism? cottle tail with Pinochet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. Which one got HCR passed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. You know who Carter blames for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. L B Johnson nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. Which one saved the US auto industry?
The right wing extremists would have been happy to let it die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC