Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wash. Post: Echoes of ’80s failure in Obama’s fail-safe budget plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:35 AM
Original message
Wash. Post: Echoes of ’80s failure in Obama’s fail-safe budget plan
During the great budget battle of an earlier generation, President Reagan and Congress agreed to write into law a fail-safe similar to the one President Obama suggested Wednesday in a major speech on reining in the nation’s debt.

Reagan’s fail-safe was designed to automatically trigger sharp cuts in government spending if massive deficits continued to spin out of control. But politicians couldn’t keep their hands off the fail-safe, adjusting it when precious programs were threatened, and ultimately they killed the provision. The cuts were “too enormous to be politically tolerable,” said Rudolph Penner, who at the time was head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Now a similar fail-safe is a hallmark of President Obama’s plan, one of several proposals that might be more unrealistic than the president acknowledged in his speech, outside analysts and economists said in interviews Thursday.

(...)

A fight in Congress produced a landmark piece of legislation called the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act that required automatic cuts if the government didn’t reduce spending enough. It had prominent opponents, including then-Speaker Tip O’Neill (D-Mass.), who denounced it as “a gimmick” and “a disgraceful measure to subvert the Constitution.”

In an ironic twist, O’Neill’s principal domestic policy adviser at the time was a young staffer named Jack Lew, now Obama’s chief budget adviser.

(...)

But some experts question whether the measures the president has proposed to reduce the deficit are realistic.

Obama takes a light touch with Medicare and Medicaid, claiming he can achieve $480 billion in savings by reducing the price of drugs and taming the cost of the programs beyond what the landmark health insurance law of last year did.

Robert Kocher, director of the McKinsey Center for U.S. Health System Reform, said one of the top options for reducing drug prices is to negotiate directly with companies. “But for a multitude of reasons that’s not been a policy that’s been pursued and I’m uncertain whether it’s conceivable,” he said.

Full story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/echoes_of_80s_failure_in_obamas_fail_safe_budget_plan/2011/04/14/AFCaakfD_story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh well .... The media is right, as usual ...
We might as well give up and do exactly what the most extreme right wing nutcase wants us to do ... (Why do you think they call them 'RIGHT' wing ????)

We can never win, because the Washington Post always sets me straight and reveals how stupid I am ! ....

Woe is me ! ....

Time to jump off a bridge ....

Good bye world .....

:sarcasm:

Assholes .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's....
Goodbye CRUEL world....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC