For those who don't remember, this is from a Ron Suskind article in the New York Times that was widely--and justifiably--reviled for being supremely arrogant, typical and completely idiotic in its misunderstanding of life itself: things are open to conjecture, but not to outright dismissal of big, active obvious facts.
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
The killings and attacks on unarmed protesters are MUCH bigger than anything that occurred in Libya, and the threat is truly there in light of Hafez al-Assad's Hama Massacre in 1982: somewhere between 17K and 40K people were killed for revolting against the regime.
Qaddafi's never done ANYTHING like that. The thing people keep citing is the prison riot at Abu-Salim, where something like 1200 Islamists were killed after they revolted and took guards hostages.
Then again, Libya has more than eighteen times as much oil as Syria...