Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoyer: Defunding Libya Undermines NATO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:00 PM
Original message
Hoyer: Defunding Libya Undermines NATO
House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said Tuesday he opposes the idea percolating in the House to defund U.S. involvement in Libya.

"It certainly would undermine the confidence of NATO in the ability of the president of the United States to participate in support of an effort that NATO had agreed to, that the United Nations had agreed to, and that the Arab League had agreed to," Hoyer told reporters during a briefing Tuesday.

The House GOP leadership is meeting today to discuss a plan on Libya that could come to the House floor for a vote as early as this week. Speaker of the House John Boehner has threatened to pull funds for the operation.

President Barack Obama told Congress last week that he didn't need congressional approval for Libya because the military actions there do not amount to full-blown hostilities, as defined by the War Powers Act.

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/national/politico/article/Hoyer-Defunding-Libya-undermines-NATO-1433423.php#ixzz1Pvlv6Jwv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heard similar statement from Sen. Kerry, on C-Span, earlier today.
Edited on Tue Jun-21-11 12:19 PM by elleng
Very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it halts NATO's over aggression with the Libya campaign
I am all for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. So? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed!
NATO will not collapse if the U.S. pulls out of this war, and the rest of NATO must choose wisely how they proceed forward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good. At least he gets the point.
Hoyer should be spelled Whore (D).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. It seems to me that what we agreed to ...
... was a couple of days, not weeks, enforcing a no-fly zone.

Not months of providing an ordnance curtain behind which the incompetent rebels can claim victory.

Undermine the confidence of NATO? Which NATO member is under attack?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Which NATO nation was attacked by Libya?
If going after bad dictators who oppress their people was behind these strikes, why hasn't NATO attacked Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. NATO is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Global Corporations.
Has been for a while.
It is the Enforcement Arm of the IMF and G-8.
There it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. What Steny seems to ommit it is was not agreed to by Congress, which
Edited on Tue Jun-21-11 04:00 PM by kelly1mm
is what is required by the war powers act - you know, US law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC