Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tiffany’s spent big bucks lobbying Callista Gingrich’s committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 12:59 PM
Original message
Tiffany’s spent big bucks lobbying Callista Gingrich’s committee
Source: Raw Story
By David Edwards

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has dodged questions about his half-million dollar Tiffany & Co. tab all week. Now, it has been revealed that the House committee Gingrich's wife Callista worked for was heavily lobbied by the posh jewelry store.

Politico revealed last week that in her 2005 and 2006 filings with the House Ethics Committee, Callista Gingrich disclosed that the former House Speaker had between $250,000 and $500,000 debt with Tiffany & Co. while she was working for the House Agriculture Committee.

"It's a standard no-interest account," Gingrich explained to CBS' Bob Schieffer Sunday. "We paid no interest on it. There was no problem with it. It's a normal way of doing business."

Over those those same years, Tiffany's doubled the amount of money they spent on lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The company spent $200,000 in 2006 alone.

More at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/25/tiffanys-spent-big-bucks-lobbying-callista-gingrichs-committee/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will all of Newt's griftting be exposed? Better go back under your rock, Newt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicons are so freakin corrupt
Edited on Wed May-25-11 01:02 PM by SpiralHawk
Republicons have deranged and depraved Family Vales that allow all kinds of cheating and lying.

As repeated harsh experience has shown to honorable Americans.

Is Callista wife #1, #2, #3 or #4 for DraftDodger Gingrich (R)? I get them confused?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. i think this will have legs.
i mean, tiffany's. does it get any more robber baron than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yep this may have more legs than a centipede
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Blue Flower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's nothing standard about a no-interest account
Raise your hand if you get to charge purchases on your account with no interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Boy, did the Newt-ster look uncomfortable when asked about that
particular IOU or what?

I could smell the flop sweat right through my television.

When do newts hide under rocks?
Newts don't specifically hide under rocks but they go under rocks whenever they want too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need to keep after Newt for "The Rest of the Story" as Paul Harvey would say.
Has Tiffany said anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just Curious - What Was Tiffany's Lobbying For?........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. What did Tiffany want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Relaxation on raw diamond imports?
Probably something to do with blood diamonds. Nice quid pro quo if that's the case. Hope Raw Story keeps picking the scab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ah .... don't keep track of that kind of stuff -- did they get it?
Newt is one of the filthier things ever to hit the planet --

but he is a world class propagandist on the order of a little Goebbels, imo!!

Corporations have brought us candidates who are the bottom of the human barrel!!


Thanks for the info!! Appreciate it!!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Elimination of capital gains taxes on precious metals?
What I'm thinking: Tiffany buys a lot of gold, silver, platinum, etc. If they bought an ounce of gold for $1200 in April 2010, made it into a product then sold it in May 2011, they've got a $300 long-term capital gain to deal with because they'd be dumbasses to not have their finished product prices track the spot price of the metals in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You're probably correct, as well -- thank you!! Good ole Newt!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's possible ...and certainly a better guess than mine.
It would be quite interesting to know what committees Callista was involved with and what legislation that directly affected Tiffany's would have been on their agenda. Your scenario could amount to 10's of millions of dollars to Tiffany's bottom line. A $500K, no interest RLC would take on a whole different context if there's a linkage along these lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC