Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Winner of the Iraq war = Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 05:27 AM
Original message
Winner of the Iraq war = Iran
http://www.opendemocracy.net/paul-rogers/america-and-iraq-iran-new-balance

The thinking was straightforward: Iran was being encircled. To the east in Afghanistan, US forces had destroyed the Taliban, installed major fortresses at Bagram and Kandahar, and were increasing influence in central Asia; to the west in Iraq, they had eliminated the Ba’athist regime and planned to establish a network of large military bases; to the south, over the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, the US fifth fleet would exert control. These changes had transformed the strategic balance to Tehran’s disadvantage, and no Iranian regime would be foolish enough to challenge the US’s new regional supremacy.

By mid-2010, a mere seven years later, this neat portrait had dissolved. The US, having endured two gruelling and costly wars, was either seeking (in Afghanistan) or in process of (Iraq) withdrawal - in neither case with any certainty of lasting strategic benefit once it was completed. In the case of Iraq, moreover, the government of Nouri al-Maliki in Baghdad was building good economic links with Iran; a disturbing process that led some voices in Washington to recommend a freeze of the military pull-out. Barack Obama’s administration was always unlikely to consider this, but cannot ignore an even more serious event.

On 2 May 2011, the head of Iraq’s armed forces, Lieutenant-General Babakar Zebari, held a meeting with Iran's ambassador in Baghdad, Hassan Danaifar. The ambassador is an interesting as well as influential figure: a native of Baghdad expelled by Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s who subsequently rose through the ranks of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC); he was appointed to his present post in 2010.

At the meeting, Zebari proposed to Danaifar that Iraq and Iran be form the core of a new regional-security organisation. This would go far beyond existing arrangements for economic cooperation, and reach to the heart of US and western European security interests (see Ellen Knickmeyer, “Iraq seeks security agreement”, International Defence Review, June 2011).

The proposed regional-security arrangement has the potential greatly to increase Iran's influence among its largest Arab neighbour, in a way that will deeply worry the United States and its coalition allies as well as Saudi Arabia and Israel. In practical terms the early steps are likely to be in air-power: Iraq’s substantial army now numbers 250,000 troops, but it so far has little more than a nominal air-force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. This outcome was apparent from Day One of planning for Operation Iraqi Freedom
Edited on Wed Jun-15-11 05:40 AM by leveymg
"We've always been at war with East Asia."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Entirely predictable -- despite the billions in unreported bribes and hush money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You bet it was
at least to anyone who was paying attention anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wednesday informational kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. R & K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. This has been obvious since around 2004 or so, after the first 6 months of the occupation of Iraq.
But every single goal of the invasion, except getting Saddam himself, has failed. We didn't get the oil, we didn't restructure the middle east, we didn't do much of anything except blow shit up, kill people, and spend boatloads of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC