Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have people actually read Obama's stated political disposition?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:15 AM
Original message
Have people actually read Obama's stated political disposition?
Obama laid out what kind of senator and what kind of president he would be in his own words in the "Audacity of Hope":
"The rejection of absolutism implicit in our constitutional structure may sometimes make our politics seem unprincipled. But for most of our history, it has encouraged the very process of information gathering, analysis, and argument that allows us to make better if not perfect choices, not only about the means to our ends but also about the ends themselves. Whether we are for or against affirmative action, for or against prayer in schools, we must test out our ideals, vision, and values, against the realities of a common life, so that over time they may be refined, discarded, or replaced by new ideals, sharper visions, deeper values."

Obama is a true believer in the constitutional process. He made no attempt to hide that. He also said that it is not easy or fast. I think some of the confusion here is in what that process is. What he is doing with these negotiations is the opposite of Republicans of the last administration which either signed executive orders or used threats to get it's way. Obama is most certainly a Democrat true to Democratic ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Right on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2.  I agree. And I think at times he plays Devil's Advocate to the Left, just to force issues
to their logical or Legal ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree
I also think he benefits politically (in terms of courting independents) from taking flack from all sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. eyes of the beholder.
that's what you see when you read that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "The rejection of absolutism"
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 10:54 AM by loyalsister
I referred to Bush as a rigid absolutist many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. The blank screen we project our views on in his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. The process has been lots of back room deals... However....
there were the few televised discussions of the initial health care discussions, but they were given over to a commission who was assisted in writing health care legislation.... This assistant was a lobbyist for the health care industry.... We know this is true because she signed her name.... Mr. Bacas thought it so great of this one time staffer to give him so much awesome input, that once it was known that she was actually writing the health care legislation,,, He could do nothing , but praise this lobbyist who decided how we private citizen's would access this un affordable insurance.... Now fast forward a year later and come over to Wisconsin.... She was just probably part of the ALEC group... So if one would swirl the ideals of certainty of Democratic ideals.... One would definitely have to keep in mind how many times these back room deals have favored the corporations both American and Foreign... Democratic ideals should never be co-opted by the privatization of the few: Pharma, Insurance, Banking, ect.... True believers of the constitutional process needs to have a full functioning Constitution too, and not a Patriot Act that subverts it's power in the secrecy of the hands of a few.... So give us our Constitution back and then we can revisit Obama's stated political disposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I k&r this post. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Is forcing a constitutional belief constitutional?
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 12:21 PM by loyalsister
Obama's reference was to the process.
I don't like the Patriot Act either, but I don't deny that it was voted on and passed via the Constitutional process.
Yes lobbyists have gained too much power. But their role as being part of the discussion is not unconstitutional. As an unpaid lobbyist I have taken part in similar conversations. We got our way a time or two but usually not (unpaid= non corporate, little money). As a matter of fact, Obama has met with the unpaid disability advocates who were rebuffed by FDR, Bush 2, Clinton, Reagan, Carter.... As a matter of fact, FDR and Carter were particularly unfriendly for political reasons.
The political process has d\evolved into a system that has been severely corrupted by money. I think a lot of us miss the days of "smoking cigars, drinking their whiskey and voting against them" that Sam Rayburn touted.
Believe me, insurance is my enemy. I have a disability and am fully at odds with the insurance industry.
But, I have several friends who own insurance companies and others who work as agents. I have plenty of arguments with them. Like it or not it is an industry that has power not only because of money but because of the employment and service it provides. Everyone needs and uses more than one form. Suppose they were to stop providing fire, flood, disaster, life insurance if they couldn't get in on the healthcare?
The Democratic principles you refer to and those I believe in are counter to the monied interests that benefit. "corporate personhood" is one I disagree with but has been ruled valid.
It would be authoritarian for one person to defy the supreme court and try to do away with it unilaterally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. .................
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Obama's stated positions rarely if ever reflect the positions he actually takes.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. All of his positions are informed by the above
He very clearly states that his personal beliefs are not as important as the democratic process. He is entirely consistent in that position and pursuit of that ideal.
An "anti-authoritarian" president is opposite the government we had during the previous presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. I did better than that,
I recorded them.

Restoring America's Honor
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-15-2010/respect-my-authoritah

EFCA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMNVIQqatyU

NAFTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LtbLEKHsi0&NR=1

Cadillac Tax
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8wmN3wvhNM&feature=player_embedded

Support for Organized LABOR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA9KC8SMu3o

Public Option & Mandates
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acc6Wn_BWlk

War in Libya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejvyDn1TPr8



"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."

--- Paul Wellstone







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Not the red meat for supporters....
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 12:51 PM by loyalsister
I'm talking about his broad political philosophy. Have you read "The Audacity of Hope?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC