Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maxine Waters says the Ethics committee violated its own rule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:48 PM
Original message
Maxine Waters says the Ethics committee violated its own rule
and her constitutional rights. Her lawyer, Stan Brand has asked that the committee's investigation be dismissed.


Ms. Waters made the request after learning of memos written late last year by the former ethics committee chief counsel that detailed unauthorized communications between the lead ethics committee lawyer handling the inquiry and Representative Jo Bonner, Republican of Alabama, who is now the committee chairman. The communications would have been inappropriate because they did not go through official channels, a violation of House rules


At issue is the fact that ethics committee lawyers realized last August that they had not sought e-mails from a private Yahoo account maintained by Mikael Moore, Ms. Waters’s chief of staff. Investigators suspected the e-mails might contain evidence about his role in helping the bank, Boston-based OneUnited, get language written into legislation that would ultimately help it secure federal bailout assistance.

.......

In November, in an unusual maneuver, the charges against Ms. Waters and the investigation were referred back to the committee for further work. Committee staff said that the action was a result of the failure of Ms. Waters’s office and the House Financial Services Committee to fully comply with a request for documents. In fact, according to the internal committee memos, it was the ethics committee staff’s own mistake, as it had not previously requested Mr. Moore’s personal e-mails.

“The behavior was inappropriate and misleading,” Mr. Chisam wrote, as he also detailed what he called inappropriate conversations and e-mails between a committee lawyer and Mr. Bonner and his staff about the case. “The staff also misled me. That was insubordinate.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/us/19ethics.html?_r=1&hpw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC