Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy Shit... In Case You Missed This... 'What Happened to Obama?' - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:34 PM
Original message
Holy Shit... In Case You Missed This... 'What Happened to Obama?' - NYT
Edited on Wed Aug-10-11 08:42 PM by WillyT
What Happened to Obama?
By DREW WESTEN - NYT
Drew Westen is a professor of psychology at Emory University and the author of “The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation.”

<snip>

In similar circumstances, Franklin D. Roosevelt offered Americans a promise to use the power of his office to make their lives better and to keep trying until he got it right. Beginning in his first inaugural address, and in the fireside chats that followed, he explained how the crash had happened, and he minced no words about those who had caused it. He promised to do something no president had done before: to use the resources of the United States to put Americans directly to work, building the infrastructure we still rely on today. He swore to keep the people who had caused the crisis out of the halls of power, and he made good on that promise. In a 1936 speech at Madison Square Garden, he thundered, “Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me — and I welcome their hatred.”

When Barack Obama stepped into the Oval Office, he stepped into a cycle of American history, best exemplified by F.D.R. and his distant cousin, Teddy. After a great technological revolution or a major economic transition, as when America changed from a nation of farmers to an urban industrial one, there is often a period of great concentration of wealth, and with it, a concentration of power in the wealthy. That’s what we saw in 1928, and that’s what we see today. At some point that power is exercised so injudiciously, and the lives of so many become so unbearable, that a period of reform ensues — and a charismatic reformer emerges to lead that renewal. In that sense, Teddy Roosevelt started the cycle of reform his cousin picked up 30 years later, as he began efforts to bust the trusts and regulate the railroads, exercise federal power over the banks and the nation’s food supply, and protect America’s land and wildlife, creating the modern environmental movement.

Those were the shoes — that was the historic role — that Americans elected Barack Obama to fill. The president is fond of referring to “the arc of history,” paraphrasing the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous statement that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” But with his deep-seated aversion to conflict and his profound failure to understand bully dynamics — in which conciliation is always the wrong course of action, because bullies perceive it as weakness and just punch harder the next time — he has broken that arc and has likely bent it backward for at least a generation.

IN contrast, when faced with the greatest economic crisis, the greatest levels of economic inequality, and the greatest levels of corporate influence on politics since the Depression, Barack Obama stared into the eyes of history and chose to avert his gaze. Instead of indicting the people whose recklessness wrecked the economy, he put them in charge of it. He never explained that decision to the public — a failure in storytelling as extraordinary as the failure in judgment behind it. Had the president chosen to bend the arc of history, he would have told the public the story of the destruction wrought by the dismantling of the New Deal regulations that had protected them for more than half a century. He would have offered them a counternarrative of how to fix the problem other than the politics of appeasement, one that emphasized creating economic demand and consumer confidence by putting consumers back to work. He would have had to stare down those who had wrecked the economy, and he would have had to tolerate their hatred if not welcome it. But the arc of his temperament just didn’t bend that far.


<snip>

Much More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/opinion/sunday/what-happened-to-obamas-passion.html?pagewanted=print

:wow:

IN contrast, when faced with the greatest economic crisis, the greatest levels of economic inequality, and the greatest levels of corporate influence on politics since the Depression, Barack Obama stared into the eyes of history and chose to avert his gaze.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, I saw it the first seventeen times it was posted.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Cool... Here's Number 18...
BTW - What did you think of the piece?

:shrug:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought it was 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BackToThe60s Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, that was just the number of paragraphs from the article in the OP
I thought there was a limit of four. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let us assume we had a "true" progressive as president. Could someone splain to me how that "true"
progressive would get blue dog democrats to vote for a progressive agenda?

My memory may not be so good, but if I recall correctly, even Democrats which didn't have the full blue dog distinguishing characteristics were not particularly keen on a public option, or Medicare for all. Two that come to mind, lieberman and dodd

Of course we had others who would have never gone with it such as byah, etc

The country is not particularly progressive, though I have had some discussions with others at DU who have argued that I was wrong, and poll after poll indicate I am wrong. Regardless of whatever polls they may be talking about, we lost Feigold's seat, Kennedy's seat,and others in states that had been traditionally Democratic.

Unless we get a progressive Democratic Congress, I do not understand why anyone would think the President should be able to do anything he wants to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Did you read the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. By publically calling them out. By making their "pragmatism" politcal suicide.
Obama got himself elected: By fully distancing himself from those bluedogs; By taking it to the people; By promising those people sometimes by implication, and sometimes directly, that he would bring those bluedogs to heel.

ALL but a supermajority of voters told him they liked what he had to say, and those voters would have eviscerated any bluedog stupid enough as to vote contrary to the wishes of a president thunderously denouncing the forces arrayed against the nation.

With the shape of the nation as it is (and has been for some time), Obama, using nothing but his electioneering rhetoric, could conceivably have taken ownership of the votes of both parties.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE: These people offer up on a platter, every single scrap of ammunition a populist would ever need to destroy them. We here on DU are not in posession of some great secret insight into their behaviour. We, along with the rest of the world are being laughed at and taunted. THEY are telegraphing every single move they take against us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Your perspective is good. The possible problem is that the MSM coverage of it would misrepresent
the situation, and divert attention away.

For example, the bogus birth certificate story is a perfect example of distraction, or giving a huge proportion of coverage to palin and such, compared to the other side

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R!!!
I have seen it before and previously spread it to friends via email.

But it bears repeating often and loudly. FDR is spinning in his grave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marginlized Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why the dropped jaw?
it's not like its the first time anyone has said this. That one is a very long line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well WillyT
I had not seen it before. I don't spend all my time here anymore so I am very pleased that you posted it. A very good article, interesting and seems to feel very true to me.

What a sad thing this is. I have never been a fan of happy, bring us all together words without action. It has been apparent to me for a very long time that this is what we elected. The silence since the election has been a horrible thing for this country.

Thanks WillyT. I gave you a K&R :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thank You Muse... That Means A Lot...
And it is exactly why I posted it.

:pals:

:hi:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Hmmmm
I saw several other posts by you, one was a poll. I can't locate it now or any of the others, it may be that I am tired? Anyway, I say stick with us here and drink........more...................a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm With You My Friend...
:toast::beer::toast:

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. !
:beer: :applause: :hippie: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Over 200 responses in this earlier one. ->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R....
"But the arc of history does not bend toward justice through capitulation cast as compromise. It does not bend when 400 people control more of the wealth than 150 million of their fellow Americans. It does not bend when the average middle-class family has seen its income stagnate over the last 30 years while the richest 1 percent has seen its income rise astronomically. It does not bend when we cut the fixed incomes of our parents and grandparents so hedge fund managers can keep their 15 percent tax rates. It does not bend when only one side in negotiations between workers and their bosses is allowed representation. And it does not bend when, as political scientists have shown, it is not public opinion but the opinions of the wealthy that predict the votes of the Senate. The arc of history can bend only so far before it breaks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyflint Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R Great read.
Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC