Why hasn't the justice department launched an investigation into diebold machine usage and

[mfcorey1]

complaints by voters ahead of the 2012 elections? Or Have they done so and I missed it? All I hear is silence.

[villager]

1. It wouldn't be, you know, "bipartisan"

n/t

[villager]

2. It wouldn't be, you know, "bipartisan"

n/t

[Kennah]

3. Too many past elections would be undone?

[Bluebear]

4. Too many medical marijuana clinics and baseball pitchers to prosecute

[Webster Green]

5. Yep.

Also raiding the houses of anti-war activists and stealing their papers and computers, and keeping dangerous groups like Raging Grannies and Code Pink under surveillance.

Holder is a fucking fascist asswipe, and his boss is clueless, since he must approve of this kind of crap.

[Skip Intro]

6. Because elections are a charade and a hidden agenda will be advanced, regardless of which party

holds "power" - ???

[dmosh42]

7. DOJ has twenty other cases Obama said they're investigating...

and we may never get their results or prosecutions in our lifetime. Mainly, they really only go after potsmokers in Calif.

[KansDem]

8. Wish I had a job where I did something like "investigating"

KansDem, I need you to investigate this!
Okay!

(Later in the say)
Say, KansDem, what are you doing now?
Investigating!
Oh, Okay

(The following week)
KansDem, what are you up to?
Investigating!
Good

KansDem, got something else that needs investigating
I'm on it!

(The following month)
KansDem, how are things going?
Great!
What's going on?
I'm investigating!
Oh, good show! Let me know if you find something.
Will do!

Yeah, that's the job I want!

[fasttense]

9. Silence like a cancer grows. n/t

[mod mom]

10. Neither party wants to relinquish power to the people.