Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Guardian calls out Palin for controversial language when Gifford is Jewish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:01 AM
Original message
UK Guardian calls out Palin for controversial language when Gifford is Jewish
Sarah Palin brands media's attacks over Arizona shooting as 'blood libel'
Politician breaks silence on Giffords shooting and lambasts opponents with controversial choice of language

-snip

Four days after an incident which left six people dead and critically injured the congresswoman Gabriel Giffords, Palin released a video statement condemning the attack.

She denied that a now infamous campaign map showing Giffords' electoral district in the cross hairs of a gun had influenced the shooter Jared Lee Loughner.

In an attack on her accusers, she said: "Journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible."

Palin's bizarre use of language is sure to provoke further controversy – a blood libel refers to the false claim that Jews murder children to use in religious rituals. Giffords is Jewish.

-snip

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/12/sarah-palin-response-arizona-shooting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. She's too fucking stupid to know this. She needs to crawl under a rock and stay there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. i think she knows exactly what she's saying....she had to look that up before she repeated it
she meant every word of it ...imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. It provides an opportunity for her to be "attacked", and for her to be the victim again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blood libel, witches, demons, gun idolatry and other fundamentalist delusions
are part of her bizarre world

no one should be surprised

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't blame Palin too much for that because do you really think she wrote it?
She is what she is and that is a shallow grifter w/ out a thought in her head outside of
what is in this for me?

BTW but it doesn't make the term any less offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Is it really that hard to google before making a statement that you know
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 10:14 AM by mod mom
will go national?

Just saying... :hi:

The GOP has been known to use coded words to incite their base in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. normal people would have but she is what she is
Fact: You can't see Russia form Alaska except from 2 little islands in the middle of the
Bering Sea one of which nobody lives on and the other Little Diomede Island, where
Palin had never set foot on. But did that stop Palin from talking about "Seeing Russia
from Alaska?" Of course not. So when some speech writer puts the term Blood Libel
in front of her she just reads it w/ out a 2nd thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder which of her handlers wrote this?
There's no way in pluperfect hell you can convince me that Crosshairs Palin - who is probably even less likely to have heard that term than her intellectual equal, incurious George - thought of using 'blood libel' in a complete sentence. Sounds like she's got an anti-Semite for a writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Watch for the 1st advisor to leave...that's the author.

Unless they have dirt on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Isn't that Mansoor..the one who spoke the other day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDad Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's interesting, and I hope she's called on that.
But I think that was just her way of further portraying HERSELF as the victim. I don't think she's THAT deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Anti-Semetic dog whisle, I swear to God.
That phrase just was't picked out of the thin air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. +1
Somebody who wrote that speech knows damn well what that term is.

Most folks (me included) have probably never heard of "blood libel" until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Which 'attack' did this video condemn? Sounded like she was not condemning Loughner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Don't you know....it's all about Sarah
:eyes: She is a national disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Guardian strikes again! Great work.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC