Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Palin's Use Of 'Blood Libel' Mirrors That In Right-Wing Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:51 PM
Original message
TPM: Palin's Use Of 'Blood Libel' Mirrors That In Right-Wing Media
Before Sarah Palin posted her Facebook provocation this morning accusing the media of committing "blood libel" for connecting some of her statements to the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), that phrase was being batted around by the conservative media.

Andrew Brietbart used the phrase in a tweet last night (though it's likely Palin's video, posted in the early morning hours Wednesday, was filmed before that tweet).

"Blood libel" popped up in a Wall Street Journal op-ed by professor and Pajamas TV host Glenn Reynolds. "Where is the decency in blood libel?" he wrote on Monday, Jan. 10.

Adam Graham of Renew America was the first to use the phrase in reference to the Tucson shootings, according to a search of Google News.

But the very first reference to "blood libel" in the wake of the Tucson massacre came from political consultant Jon Henke, who used the phrase on Twitter the same day as the shootings, according to Google's realtime search.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/palins_use_of_blood_libel_mirrors_that_in_right-wing_media.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Google Netanyahu "Blood Libel".... 106,000 hits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhillySane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yea, they got together and agreed
this was the t-point/catchphrase they'd hammer out there. Too bad the dopes picked a phrase that now will generate even more resentment towards them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I hope they are now in quicksand. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're upping the ante.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought there was nothing that she could do to shock me anymore.
I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. The RWingnut meme machine is a thing of awesomeness. It is not unlike The Borg.
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 03:13 PM by BrklynLiberal
For those familiar with Star Trek:Voyager, you will know the power of the Borg Collective...

from Wikipedia:

Borg Collective

Also referred to as the "hive mind" or "collective consciousness" , this is the term used to describe the group mind of the Borg civilization. Each Borg individual, or drone, is linked to the collective by a sophisticated subspace network that ensures each member is given constant supervision and guidance. The collective is broadcast over a subspace domain similar to that utilized by the transporter. Being part of the collective offers significant biomedical advantages to the individual drones. The mental energy of the group consciousness can help an injured or damaged drone heal or regenerate damaged body parts or technology. The collective consciousness not only gives them the ability to "share the same thoughts", but also to adapt with great speed to defensive tactics used against them.<1>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for posting! I have been trying to find out how writes Palin/Bachmann speeches! I think
this might help do just that! The MACHINE is hard at work cranking this crap out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick - more DUers need to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Indeed, Ma'am: She Cannot Even Make A Mistake All On Her Own....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. She is not a being of creativity, she is a being of destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's basically a chain of evidence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Indeed. And it actually goes back even further - Tony Blankley used it in a 2006 Wash. Times piece
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 08:16 PM by scarletwoman
lambasting the media for condemning the murders in Haditha. By his accounting, the media was committing "blood libel" against the Marines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does anyone actually believe Palin writes any of her
speeches? I mean, any part of her speeches? Her delivery of the speech was poor. Either she was seeing the speech for the first time - or she didn't prepare. Which isn't surprising. She's careless and lazy. Her "analysis" on Fox has been abysmal. She doesn't have any knowledge - so, she can't analyze. Her speech writer wrote blood libel - Palin has no idea what she said. She just knows she liked the sound of it and it sounded "Mama Grizzly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC