I do a great deal to support the teachers of my children. My wife volunteers significant time in the classroom. We give frequent gifts to teachers (food gift certificates etc). I ensure that my children are disciplined and prepared to learn in their classrooms. My daughter is sharing some of the dissection samples I got for her for her Homeschooled Biology class with her Study Hall class (she is performing the dissection after reviewing the procedures from college textbooks on the subject). I have tutored friends of my children. I think I have earned the right to say whether some teachers are doing a good job or not. I already pay a significant share of my salary in taxes to support the school district in the form of state income taxes and property taxes, and I am willing to consider spending more if necessary. As a nation we are spending over $14K/year per public school student. Obviously a lot of this money never makes it into the classroom.
I have no time or patience for teachers who are mailing it in (older daughters 7th and 8th grade English, 7th grade Social Studies, 10th grade Chemistry, and 10th grade Algebra II. This is not a matter of class discipline, style or emphasizing the wrong thing which I have issues with as well, but I defer to the judgement of the teachers or I homeschool my children in those subjects. The complaint is not having a passion for the subject which is being taught, not offering feedback, failure to lecture, etc.
Poor teachers should be encouraged to find another occupation. On the other hand those teachers who are committed should be compensated more (the purpose of my original post). Frankly I would love a European style system in which the only tests are the final Form tests which decide entrance on a competitive basis to free or greatly reduced in tuition colleges.
I personally would kill all varsity sports programs if I could wave a wand and change our school system and put that extra money into additional instruction (especially meaningful vocational training). The only sports would be power paired intramurals where everyone would be encouraged to participate.
Some additional sources comparing pay between teachers in the U.S. and Finland.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wherewestand/reports/globalization/finland-whats-the-secret-to-its-success/206/When asked about their ranking, Finnish educators and experts consistently cite the country’s teachers. In Finland, they say, teaching is considered one of the most highly esteemed professions – hardly a surprise, considering the fact that all of the country’s teachers must hold master’s degrees, and the profession is highly competitive. Even though the salaries of Finnish teachers are comparable to those in the U.S., a job opening in a Finnish classroom typically attracts more than 40 applicants.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2011/0317/Next-US-education-reform-Higher-teacher-qualityIn Finland, teachers earn only about what their American counterparts do (US teacher pay starts, on average, at $39,000). The difference is that in Finland, teaching is a high-status, well-respected job, right up there with doctoring and lawyering.
I think something is wrong with this statistic, but I am including it for information purposes. U.S. number seems high
http://www.worldsalaries.org/teacher.shtmlWorld Salaries > International Average Salary Income Comparison > Teacher Salary
U.S. average salary PPP $ 4,055 $ 4,055 Full-time and part-time employees, 2005. U.S. Department of Labor,
. 5,266 dollars 23% 36.6
UK median salary PPP $ 3,075 $ 3,568 Employees, 2005. UK Employment Department, <9>, . 2,759 pounds 29% 32.5
Germany average salary PPP $ 3,065 $ 3,309 Minimum per month, 2005, normal hours of work. Federal Statistical Office of Germany, <9>, . 4,088 euros 35% 40.0
Australia average income PPP $ 2,793 $ 2,742 May 2004. Normal hours from collective agreements. Australian Bureau of Statistics, <9>, . 4,632 dollars 22% 39.1
Korea average salary PPP $ 2,643 $ 2,096 Excl. overtime and bonus, June 2005. All teachers, incl. tertiary level. Korea Ministry of Labour, <9>. 2,402,059 wons 11% 39.7
Norway average income PPP $ 2,573 $ 3,550 Employees, 2005. Statistics Norway, <9>. 34,186 kroners 33%
Japan average salary PPP $ 2,518 $ 2,961 Excl. overtime and bonus, June 2005. Women only. Private establishments with 10 or more regular employees. Japan Statistical Yearbook <17>, . 392,000 yens 17%
France median salary PPP $ 2,483 $ 1,950 All teachers at all levels. Full-time employees, 2002. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques, <36>. 1,900 euros 0%
Canada average income PPP $ 2,238 $ 2,236 Employees, 2005. Statistics Canada, <9>, . 3,868 dollars 30% 31.1
Finland average salary PPP $ 1,936 $ 2,311 Normal hours of work, 2004. Men only. Women make 2,586 euros per month. Statistics Finland, <9>, , . 2,654 euros 32% 36.4
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/edu_pri_tea_sal_sta-education-primary-teacher-salary-starting
Education Statistics > Primary teacher salary > Starting (most recent) by country
# 5 United States: $25,707.00
# 17 Finland: $18,110.00
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/08/teachers-paid-on-par-with-doctors/
Average salaries of public school teachers with 15 years experience, as of 2007. The salaries are in U.S. dollars and adjusted for purchase power parity. (Click on tab to go to the spreadsheet)
Upper Secondary Teachers (15 years experience)
U.S. $43,966
Finland $43,040
Primary Starting Salary (no experience)
U.S. $35,907
Finland $28,201