Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of evidence Rep. Kucinich was supposedly presented with to HELP the Gaddafi Regime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DFab420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:46 PM
Original message
List of evidence Rep. Kucinich was supposedly presented with to HELP the Gaddafi Regime
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 04:46 PM by DFab420
"According to the document, Kucinich wanted evidence of corruption within the NTC and, like Welch, any possible links within rebel ranks to al-Qaeda.

The document also lists specific information needed to defend Saif Al-Islam, who is currently on the International Criminal Court's most-wanted list."

l.Any corrupt (verifiable) acts by the Opposition leaders. Include any personal motives for instance
to make money or gain certain types of power.

2.Any known Al-Qaeda operating in the Opposition.

3 .Any evidence ofatrocities committed by the Rebel soldiers.

4-.Any evidence ofCivilian deaths by NATO.

5 .Any evidence of arms sales to the Opposition in Benghazi or Misrata, including dates, who sold
the weapons, what type and the cost ofthe deals.

6.Any evidence of weapons being smuggled on boats to Misrata, with dates. and type of weapons.

7.Any evidence that the uprising was a planned event prior to February 17th. include intercepted
communications, names, dates.

S.Evidence supporting that the Regime has a regular practice of hiring African military in its Pan-
African units and this was not a new (mercenaries) thing just for the uprising.

9.Communications with the UK and USA prior to the UN bombings to show Regime was
trying to negotiate peacefully.

10.Evidence of cease fires by the Regime or withdrawals of troops. Dates, location, description
(including why cease fire broke down).

1l.Evidence that before the uprising started, there were democratic projects under way, for
instance a plan for elections and so forth. This shows that they were already going this way and
aren't just saying that now.

l2.Evidence that The Leader had already planned to step down before the uprisings. This shows
there was already a transition going on. It also helps him save face for when he does step down
because it will look like that was the plan all along.

l3.A list of tribes and location known to be loyal to Regime, those pledging loyalty to Opposition,
and the remaining ones that have not pledged either way. The population of each group as well,
This shows that the Rebels don't have the full support of the country.

l4.A list and description (including date and location) of humanitarian efforts by Regime since this
started, or their attempts to aid the civilian population, and any efforts blocked by NATO or the
Rebels.


Alot of this sounds like he would need cables and messages that involved either the State Dept. or the DoD. I wonder if he sees those files without clearance what the penalty would be? Would there be one?

When did congressmen start working against the stated policy of the State Dept?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. "When did congressmen start working against the stated policy of the State Dept?"
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 04:49 PM by sudopod
You must be new here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFab420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Been here awhile now.. Last time I saw this was Eric Cantor's discussions with Israel
about how the new GOP would act as the mouthpiece for Israel in the US Congress......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which, however, is in accord with US policy.
Horrible as it is to defend Cantor on anything and please consider this a one off.

Kucinich, however, needs to sit down and think about things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFab420 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree. I think Kucinich is suffering a bit of a Quixotic syndrom. He lost the forest to the trees.
Focused so much on proving the Libyan intervention was wrong that he stuck in fingers into less then desirable pies..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He DOES think - more than most in Congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good for DK. Congress allocates the money and has a right to know what it's being spent on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. And if the mujahadin in Afghanistan had been so vetted before we poured
money and arms into their organizations, would there have been a Bin Laden or a Taliban?

Contrary to 'real politik', the enemy of my enemy is NOT necessarily my friend. It is, if anything, MORE important to understand our allies than our enemies. We are not, after all, funding our enemies (except in Iraq and Afghanistan, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. You mean Dennis was working against yet another illegal war?
I love the supposed evidence. So where is it, and where has it been proven it was the intent to HELP (yours, not mine) the Gaddafi regime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kucinich did the right thing.
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 06:28 PM by girl gone mad
The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.

Since when is it wrong to analyze evidence before reaching conclusions? Why the attempt to spin proper due diligence into an act of treason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent, a Congressman actually doing his job.
Since it is the job of Congress to decide whether a war should be funded or not, why was he the only one, assuming he was, who was asking all of these questions?

Surely no one is finding fault with a Congressman asking questions to determine whether or not the US should be involved in yet another war?

To think how Congress has behaved in the past, just rubber-stamping all of our foreign invasions and then funding them for years, while cutting essential programs for the most vulnerable Americans right here, endangering the lives of those Americans, I am glad to know that at least someone is asking questions first before just going along with ever foreign adventure the Executive Branch decides to get this country involved in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dupe n/t
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 06:55 PM by sabrina 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC