|
Edited on Fri Nov-11-11 04:57 PM by frazzled
It's Tennessee that came up with the cockamamie system.
Evaluation is hard. My husband is chairing his school's (higher education, undergraduate and graduate) tenure review committee--just one of three steps in the tenure process (the departmental review, the system-wide tenure review committee, the administration's review, in addition to outside assessors). He is spending 30 hours per week or more on a single candidate, including reviewing materials, preparing for the meetings, conducting the meetings, which last often 4 to 5 hours, and then having to write up complex reports that represent a fair assessment of all committee members' assessments. People take it very seriously. He thought this was a good deal in return for a reduction in course load for the year. But it's actually creating a lot more work and a lot less time to prepare his remaining classes and do the writing projects he's committed to (with publication deadlines). But it's a good learning experience in thinking about the criteria necessary to maintain a strong faculty.
I realize that the criteria and stakes for elementary-high school education are different. But there must be a good system to find--helpful to both administrators and teachers--to do this kind of evaluation. But it doesn't come easy. And it doesn't come from a checklist. It takes hours of input and assessment from colleagues, supervisors, students, and outside professionals. Hopefully it is a process that helps everyone (the students and overall working of the school being the most important factors). I know teachers who favor assessment: but few have decided how it should be done.
|