Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOXLEAKS: How Bill Sammon Slanted Fox's Cairo Speech Coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:36 PM
Original message
FOXLEAKS: How Bill Sammon Slanted Fox's Cairo Speech Coverage
On June 4, 2009, a couple of hours after President Obama delivered his much-anticipated speech in Cairo regarding America's relationship with the Muslim world, Fox News Washington managing editor Bill Sammon sent an email to Fox staff pointing out that Obama did not use "the words 'terror,' 'terrorist' or 'terrorism.' "

The email, which did not include any text beyond the subject line, read as follows:

From: Sammon, Bill
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:23 AM
To: 169 -SPECIAL REPORT; 069 -Politics; 036 -FOX.WHU; 030 -Root (FoxNews.Com); 050 -Senior Producers; 051 -Producers
Cc: Clemente, Michael; Stack, John; Wallace, Jay
Subject: FYI: My cursory check of Obama's 6,000-word speech to the Muslim world did not turn up the words "terror," "terrorist" or "terrorism"


Sammon's "cursory check" quickly became the editorial focus for Fox News journalists covering Obama's speech, and was repeated (in some instances almost verbatim) by the network's hosts. Sammon himself appeared on Fox shortly after sending the email and claimed that Obama, in not using "terrorism" or any of its variants, showed that "he has taken us off a war footing as a nation."

Sammon's criticism, however, was misleading. Obama devoted a significant section of his remarks to denouncing and confronting Al Qaeda and other "violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security." Sammon's criticism also disregarded the analyses of Middle East and terrorism experts who viewed Obama's word choice as an effort to remove as a source of tension terms that, through overuse and misuse, have become incendiary in the Muslim world.

The New York Times noted the rationale behind Obama's word choice in a June 4, 2009, article:

But while he spoke uncompromisingly of the American fight against Al Qaeda, Mr. Obama never mentioned the words "terrorism" or "terrorist." That was a departure from the language used by the Bush administration, but one that some Middle East experts suggested reflected a belief by the new administration that overuse had made the words inflammatory.


<snip>

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102080014
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eat shit, sammon.
I just hope I live long enough to see the pendulum swing back. At the moment it doesn't look so good though. CONS just seem to be locking up everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sammon's scammin America
Typical RW RepubliBagger propaganda horseshit.

No wonder honorable Americans think Fox is nest of overpaid, blow-dry chickenhawk RepubliWankers...It's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. faux is a scourge to journalism....
they don't like anything that is a departure from the bu$h* administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. You have to realize their vocabulary is limited.
Terrorist, terrorism, flag, waving, Muslim/Muslin, 911, 9-11, Reagan, Palin, FOX, O'Reilly,Beck, Rush...get the picture?

Obama used words they don't normally run across. He needs to get down to their level. His speechwriters could take a break from coming up with that fancy stuff. It's wasted on the Pugs.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fox "News" - a clear and present danger to the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC