Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An NPR exec mouths off about conservatives and the Tea Party and they have to resign?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:47 PM
Original message
An NPR exec mouths off about conservatives and the Tea Party and they have to resign?
When are Fox News executives going to resign? This is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roger Ailes isn't even indicted yet and NPR execs have to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southerner Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Um...
...I read NPR gets $450 million a year of federal dollars. Fox is a private enterprise. Huge difference.

I really have liked NPR over the years but showing a clear bias when ALL taxpayers are funding them is just not right. I hope they stay afloat and keep providing the many news angles on topics you don't hear on the other stations but I fear this video will give the repugs too much ammunition this time to cut the funding completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. another screw over from James O'Keefe!!!!!!!!!!! -puke-
Edited on Wed Mar-09-11 12:58 PM by BrklynLiberal
How do these guys fall for this again!!!????

and I would bet that the majority of ACTUAL TAXPAYERS is a liberal, left-leaning population.

The repukes and their corporations merely give more donation$ to those that make the laws...that enable most rich repukes to evade taxes.

I could see the repukes being pissed if it were their political donations that were being used to fund NPR...but TAXES!?! screw them.


NOT THE SAME THING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. What clear bias? Please explain...
As far as this most recent "sting," this was what should have been a private conversation. And the fellow doing the commenting was not a news person or on air personality.

Many of us here, including myself, have noticed a definite rightward drift on NPR with more and more rightwing think tank people and politicians being favored in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Your source of information ($450 million in federal funding) is incorrect.
But only by $450 million. The total annual budget for NPR is one third the number you quoted, and they receive no direct federal funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Right, but that's a bit of a shell game.
NPR gets its money from member stations, who get much of their money from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which in turn is funded by the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ok. Let's look at the facts some more.
NPR gets a bit less than half of its funding from various fees it charges member (local) stations. Those stations, in turn, get about 16% of their total funding from direct federal money (6%)and grants from the Corporation for Publication Broadcasting (10%). So, if you add it all up, NPR gets about 1.6% of its funding directly from the CPB, 4% indirectly from CPB through its member stations, and 2.4% of its funding by means of the shell game of feds to member stations to NPR. That's a total of 8% of its funding from all sources that have any federal connection.

I'm sure that NPR would rather not have to go looking for that $13 million every year, but it's really not a big amount of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The CPB had a budget in excess of $400,000,000 in 2010.
Even if the CPB's spending is characterized as subsidies to show producers, these subsidies ultimately redound back to the benefit of PBS and NPR, since it makes the shows affordable.

http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/leadership/board/resolutions/resolution.php?prn=898

If all that were at stake was $13 million, NPR would be much better off if it became 100% member funded. In reality, we're talking about considerably more than $13 million, though the layers of distribution somewhat obscure the exact figures. Suffice it to say that the CPB's entire $400 million plus budget is required to allow public broadcasting to continue under its present structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southerner Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Found the article that quoted the numbers
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-resigns-james-okeefe-orchestrated/story?id=13092007

Looks like Buzz Clik is correct about the path of the money but the reporter was lazy when writing this paragraph:

"The controversy comes at a delicate time for public broadcasting, including PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which got nearly $450 million in federal funding last year. President Obama proposed raising that amount to $451 million. But with the federal government facing severe budget deficits, and in light of the scandal, Tea Party groups and some Republicans on Capitol Hill are stepping calls to cut all federal funding to NPR."

The reporter does not state how much money actually trickles down to NPR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. The guy is entitled to his personal opinions just like anyone else..
This is actually NPR-enabled right wing bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Winner.
I love NPR, but this just kowtows to right-wing bullying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's all say it together now: "IOKIYAR" !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fox News does not care about their image. NPR does care.
NPR kills itself to be unbiased (much to the dismay of many DUers). They don't need those efforts undermined by a loose cannon with no discretion and no self control.

Fox wants to be known as rightwing insane. It's who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. if they cared about their image they'd fight back
giving up doesn't help their image it makes them sound guilty. It's not biased to point out your accuser is a biased themselves with an agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Uh, yeah it is. NPR recognized that these people made offensive comments.
They took responsibility for the situation, and heads rolled.

That's life with the grown ups. Ask Juan Williams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. only if you trust the source
no respectable news source trust the source. As the Breitbart case showed selective editing can make you sound like you are saying the opposite they are saying. The source of the material is not trust worthy. They look stupid for giving someone with a proven track record of selective editing and criminal activity and promoting them as credible. Why should a news organization do that? Life is for grown ups, and the source of this story isn't a grown up. Sorry swing and a miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. One of them was fired, one resigned. Both admitted that the reporting was accurate.
Time for a new umpire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Says a lot about the rightist mind-set of NPR. If it were run by leftists
this wouldn't even be a story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, that's logical.
Only the conservatives care about objectivity, whereas the left don't give a damn. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. You get tax dollars
and more is expected. The CEO was becomming a distraction in the funding debate and had to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Why do you listen to the rightwing bullshit on this subject?
Exactly how much government funding do you think NPR gets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I don't do right wing
I don't care if it's $5 or $5 million. If they can do without it, they should and then they can put on whatever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Baloney.
No amount of tax funding pays you to relinquish your 1st Amendment rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Exactly right...
...when the right wingers make much more outrageous statements about "liberals", not even in private, they are congratulated and it helps their careers.

Not that I want "us" to be more like "them", just that there is a ridiculous double standard at play, where we are all supposed to get the vapors when someone privately expresses the opinion that racism is part and parcel of the Tea Party dynamic. Like, duh.

Disclaimer: I have not listened to the tapes nor read the transcripts, so maybe what they said was beyond the pale. Still, things are said that are beyond the pale every day of every week on Fox News and CNN and CNBC, not to mention talk radio's disgusting assortment of mean-spirited right wing drivelers, and for them it seems to always be a career boost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Double Standard is mindboggling.
Speaking ugly truths gets you fired.

Speaking ugly lies enhances your standing, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Perfectly fine civil servants should not collapse to someone the likes of O'Keefe
Instead, they should boot that stupid fuck in the ass and send him to prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. NPR is not on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Nor should they be. They should be objective. That's what good journalism is.
Calling a group of people xenophobes and racists was bad form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Perhaps Congress should cut off funding to both NPR and Fox News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Oh I get it. So clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. The T-baggers will do whatever they can to dismantle NPR.




And the same goes for any RWingnuts. They will do whatever
they can to silence all but the RW Media Hatemongers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. That is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. It wasn't even an exec. The mouther-offer was just a NPR fundraiser
who had no input into editorial content or news nor anything that goes over the air at NPR. The CEO, who resigned, has the same last name by coincidence, and had no part in the remarks about the racist character of the Tea Party, remarks that were quite accurate if general and offhand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. Filthy freepers will defend Fox news all day--they find nothing wrong
Edited on Wed Mar-09-11 04:16 PM by Kingofalldems
with the way Fox and O'Keefe operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC