|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:34 PM Original message |
Gaping holes in data from Japan distresses nuclear experts - LA Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. maybe they should hire a translator & look on the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Tepco doesn't give them the data they need for analysis nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Which data would that be, do you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Example being how they had to reverse engineer data to know releases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. If they're able to do the calculations, they have the information they need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Why would you defend a company accused of corruption? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. why would you infer that i am "defending" tepco simply because, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Your ongoing unwavering support for the nuclear industry is duly noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Your unwavering inability to distinguish "support for the nuclear industry" from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. The article notes a half a dozen people complaining about the lack of transparency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 12:57 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. really? here's my count. plus a lot of references to what anonymous "experts say" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Seems they're all about "regard for factuality". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. The article may be asking questions. However, I see no "experts" asking them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. In other words, you don't have the answer. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:50 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. answer to what? what is your angle? i have no "angle". what's yours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. How playful of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Is that a lot of radiation? 50% of Chernobyl radiation release? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It's concentrated more locally because they didn't have the huge explosion of Chernobyl nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not just that. Fukushima released Cs and I, which are volatile, whereas Chernobyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Good point. Let's hope it stays contained! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. What that article fails to tell you about this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. well is this ending anytime soon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrookBrew (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. Maybe it will be worse than this. This is a quarter megaton shot 400 miles from LA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Nukes need to be left back in the last century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrookBrew (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. As soon as those can provide a base load, for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. Wait until tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Check the energy forum, Fukushima will be upgraded to a Level 6 accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. wait, i just read another expert here at du who posted that it already *had* been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalun D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 01:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Probably Should Be a 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. The fact that someone thinks it should be a 6, or may rate it a 6, doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC