|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
dgibby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:02 AM Original message |
DOJ has decided against civilian trials for 9/11 suspects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Gee, who could have predicted this? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. Shocking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
3. The whole Guantanomo thing is a scam anyway. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. WTF!? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. All the better to keep the chirade safely isolated and away from public notice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. +1000% -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
6. The only conclusion to draw is that whatever evidence they have would appear to a jury to be ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. +1000% -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
7. House Blocks U.S. Trial Of Guantanamo Detainees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. The Congress doesn't get to decide anymore than they would if you were accused of an offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Defense Department lawyer asks Congress to retain civilian court option for detainee trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Okay but does not address my thoughts and also demonstrates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. House Blocks U.S. Trial Of Guantanamo Detainees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. So Congress can deny your right to a trial of your peers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. We are citizens, not held in Gitmo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. The Constitution applies to every government action, domestic or abroad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. The Constutution applies to every government action, but it does not apply to every resident of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:24 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Yeah, it always applies. An enemy combatant is some bullshit label to willfully evade the rule of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. The US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Where is the carve out? By what authority does the government act outside of the constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. As I said, you don't know squat. Feel free to do some real research next time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Deleted message |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. That "gobbledygook" is Federal Law. If you don't like it, get the USSC to overturn it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:34 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. This is simply incorrect: "(the Constitution) does not apply to every resident of this country". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. That's what I said in my reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
8. The new boss, same as the old boss (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. cheap shot and untrue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thunderstruck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Really? How so? IIRC, there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlimJimmy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. The truth is what it is. If you are so offended then show where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
16. Depends on how they are classified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. This is so bogus, FGS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. IIRC according to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. These people are not in the military of any nation and some have just been picked up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:37 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Perhaps... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I'm discussing "technicalities", like what army do these folks serve in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. according to ag holder, justice still wants trials in american courts and congress blocked them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. Details, details ... stop trying to deflect ... Obama is a Unitary executive and can dictate this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thunderstruck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
22. Who has been convicted so far for the crime of 9/11. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Dick "War Games" Cheney, Donald "Stand Down" Rumsfeld, and Dubya "Pet Goat" Bush? Not yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-04-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
30. Why bother? They will probably all be dead from old age while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
37. Disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC