|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:28 PM Original message |
Anyone have any reason to believe voting machine shenanigans in Wisconsin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's why if a Repub beats Obama in 2012....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. You have to have a relatively close election or the entire system would be called into question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeelingBlue (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. I was just wondering the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yellow Horse (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Probably out raising money and acting like hot dogs... they're good at that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Casandia (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. I saw Kloppenburg just lose 10,000 votes from Dane county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeelingBlue (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Evidence of misdeeds? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Dane just went from 207/248 to 243/248 w/no change in votes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Casandia (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I saw that too!!! Something stinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The precinct tally was messed up to, it went up but the votes did not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I saw that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Did you that saw it take screenshots???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:06 AM Response to Reply #10 |
38. It's great that you saved these notes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Did you capture that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
24. PLEASE take screenshots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
28. I saw 2,000 votes disappear from her total last night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:49 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. the Central Tabulator, I would assume... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:48 AM Response to Reply #3 |
31. If only someone would have known to capture the 2 images. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. THere are a couple of counties that have him at 71-73% What's with that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janet118 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. This one bothers me . . . the votes stopped coming in a while ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:52 AM Response to Reply #15 |
33. I dont trust the Waukesha results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't live there but I believe there will be fraud. Caused by the Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. This isn't looking good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaryninMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. Lots of reasons. I'd say chances are there will be shenagans to put it mildly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal life (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. If they can, they will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mb7588a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
18. Paper ballots across the state. Not likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. How are the paper ballots counted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:04 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Which would be caught by the manual audit of random precincts. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. According to link below, that only occurs in a General Election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:54 AM Response to Reply #18 |
34. paper ballots counted by Diebold/ES&S on their computers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
19. History? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
20. Anything is possible though I think it unlikely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
22. These GOP voting computers came in during the late 1960's... I'd question every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
23. Verified Voting does great work on this issue--worth supporting, as well as looking to for info... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
25. There's always vote fraud when WE lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:18 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Historically speaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:56 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. not fair. RW companies - ES&S/Diebold tabulate the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Exactly. That's what I'm saying. When THEY win, they're cheating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #25 |
42. Oh no, even when we win it is only because they couldn't steal enough votes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Why would they be limited in how many votes they steal? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. It has to look like it is at least possible. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
26. Of course. Electronic voting machines are inherently manipulable. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
35. Other than the fact that the opposition has already broken the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Repeatedly and Often -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LucasD (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
39. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reformist2 (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
41. I don't believe all these 50%/50% results. We need to go back to paper ballots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
46. CHART: Anomalous vote shift in Milwaukee County |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
47. It's inevitable that the losing side an any given race is going to accuse the winner of cheating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC