Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama’s Top 5 Broken Campaign Promises - RawStory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:10 PM
Original message
President Obama’s Top 5 Broken Campaign Promises - RawStory
President Obama’s top 5 broken campaign promises
By Stephen C. Webster
Tuesday, April 5th, 2011 -- 1:09 pm

<snip>

President Barack Obama came to office on a tide of voters eager to see a change in more than just the White House's occupant. Two years into his presidency -- and one day after he launched his 2012 reelection campaign -- and even some of his most ardent supporters are having trouble coming to terms with the answer to Sarah Palin's 2010 question: "How's that hopey, changey stuff working out?"

Polls show that less than half the country believes President Obama deserves reelection, with disaffected liberals now a fast growing demographic.

Even though Obama clearly leads all of the likely Republican front-runners at this point, the deep dissatisfaction brewing within his core constituency could make the president, and his whole party, uniquely vulnerable in next year's elections.

Below are five of the biggest campaign pledges Obama failed to keep -- for which he'll likely have to answer before election day 2012.
-----

1. Health care for all...

<snip>

More: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/05/the-top-five-campaign-promises-obama-left-behind/

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a broken campaign promise, but...
...where is Obama's leadership in bringing a halt to the steady collapse that is Arizona?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's the President of the United States.
Not of Arizona. It's not his job to fix this pathetic state we live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually, it is...
Arizona is still part of said United States, so if the Governor doesn't want to do her fucking job, I think someone needs to, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Considering that he took our Governor away
He contributed to the collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I give him not just a pass, but a commendation for staying away from Madison.

Scott Walker gave the labor movement more help than we could have dreamed of.

Obama showing up would have possibly back-fired. It's OK for him to have kept his powder dry on that front.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Except for, you know, the unions losing their shirts on collective bargaining
Maybe that new state Supreme Court justice will do some good, and maybe she won't. Walker is still winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And what would Obama's presence accomplish?

It's not at all clear to me that one-term Walker is winning. Yesterday's election is but one indication.

Am I missing something? (That happens, I admit.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. On what planet?
He is a doorstop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. If he had shown some leadership on EFCA, we might not have ever had the problems in WI.
Labor would have been re-energized 18 months ago. It would have meant a lot. Instead, it's the same old lip service every time the campaign ramps up and needs cash and staffing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I don't disagree. I was commenting on Wisconsin.

But perhaps it's besides the point given Obama's considerable preoccupation with a non-progressive agendas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. See... That's The Problem...
We were never assured (post 2008 Election) as to which side Obama stood (well... we were, but we don't believe him any longer...) and to this day, still do not.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I didn't believe him or Hillary in 2008.

And that's especially so given Bill Clinton's introduction of him at the 2004 DNC. He gave a rousing speech to nationally launch the guy who'd become his wife's major opponent.

Set-up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Although still an Obama supporter, I agree with these with the exceptions of
Gtmo and marching w/the protestors.

He signed an order to close Gtmo, not his fault he was blocked in his attempt.

And once you're POTUS, there's a whole load of things you can't do, like get involved with States' actions and just mingle with the people like a regular citizen. I think if he was still candidate Obama, he'd have been there. He came out and said it was union busting, and I believe he does support unions and workers' rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Re-negotiation of NAFTA? That promise seems to have gone down the memory hole.
On tax and trade his words in 2008 seem less like broken promises and more like outright deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, I'm an enemy of the UnReKKK function but will UnReKKK *this*!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You are an unreKKKer now.
Remember that whenever you call it "unreKKK".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yaas, I yam and there's the reason for that !1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Guantanamo, not repealing Patriot Act and not putting any of the BushCo or Wall Street criminals on
trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. I would add that he promised to defend the Constitution,
but he now shreds our Fourth Amendment by supporting the lining up of Americans not accused of any crime for crotch groping and naked scans.

He promised that the "Affordable Care Act" would actually make health care affordable while knowing full well that it contained no serious cost control measures and that it would mandate Americans to purchase a product they could not afford to use.

He led all of us to believe that the public option was still on the table even after he had already struck a deal with the health insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roman7 Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. way to lose
best way to lose is keep driving a wedge in the democratic party &let the repukes win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. 2. Close Guantanamo
Edited on Thu Apr-07-11 12:06 AM by ZombieHorde
The article does not mention Congress' role in Guantanamo still being open. I wonder why this is. Seems fishy. I feel like Stephen C. Webster is trying to fool me with poor information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC