|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:21 PM Original message |
8/13/10-Officials dispute reliability of Waukesha County clerk's election data system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Exactly what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
49. Are elections to be decided by the vote "counters"? Where is the scrutiny for election fraud? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #49 |
83. They always are. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
65. Remember how Blackwell had the data routed to a private server run by a GOP firm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #65 |
84. More importantly, and got away with it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piggy2000 (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
88. Don't Forget Florida.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. She fucking pulled this BEFORE? People here are saying the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I live in Florida too...these folks are being naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I used to live in Wisconsin , that naive attitude comes from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. LOL ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
russspeakeasy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Me too, please buy my house so I can move to a liberal state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TxVietVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
62. Texas, a liberal state????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:00 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Something tells me Russ had tongue stuck tightly against cheek while typing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TxVietVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:10 AM Response to Reply #63 |
68. I figured surely he jest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #62 |
90. That was a joke. sarcasm. and the funniest joke I've seen in a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #15 |
78. The Republicans howl just as loud here in Washington State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Yup. Fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. Even Nate Silver is saying it's looks legit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Count the ballots... then compare with the number of voters who voted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:12 PM Response to Reply #44 |
99. They need to get a court order to impound the ballots/machines/records! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #44 |
104. Can the paper ballots be changed, or other paper ballots be substituted for them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:38 AM Response to Reply #33 |
66. Do you have a link? I searched 538 and couldn't find anything on it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. From his twitter account @fivethirtyeight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:03 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. The One Wisconsin Now article in the OP disagrees with Nate Silver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #73 |
87. Tweets 1 and 2 disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #73 |
93. Newest post from Nate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mistertrickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #93 |
103. He's arguing on statistics alone, which aren't conclusive either way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #103 |
116. the table of results during canvassing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #69 |
118. There are many ways to steal an election than the obvious straw man you erect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #33 |
95. Didn't some precintcs "run out of paper ballots" and were switched to touch screen voting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #3 |
96. Is there a link to the past fraud and immunity agreement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
100. Judging from her past record she is likely to have already, even before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. Damn it....I can't take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeelingBlue (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. My smilies, exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
34. If that's the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nostradammit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 02:38 AM Response to Reply #34 |
53. Which Kathy Nickolaus keeps locked in her garage, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thunderstruck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Koch theft! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Koch Robin'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. She needs to be in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louslobbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. No one gave her authority to do this(sure ok), she did it herself to "protect" the integrity of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
47. Rachel didn't give this any legitimacy, did she? This is fricking outrageous ballot box theft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #9 |
108. i can only assume what she did was illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. k/r n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. She's crooked. Crooked election, period. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. So...let me get this straight. She did it before. She was softly reprimanded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Just helping out the man SHE USED TO WORK FOR! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
16. Deleted message |
Blue Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. WHOA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
19. Rachel had on a WI law prof, former legislator, saying it looked suspicious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #19 |
48. Good, that answered my reply above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
109. looked suspicious? understatement of the year. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roxiejules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. She was a Computer Spec. for the Rep. Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Oh man! Huge flags! Geeze. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:05 AM Response to Reply #21 |
74. Resigned in scandal - after getting an immunity deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roxiejules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:11 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. The Dem at press conference was quite elderly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
91. That's who we want taking acre of our votes, exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renegade000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's a problem when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. DREs - Election Results Easily Altered by Outsiders AND Insiders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Evidence of DRE used here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Yes, a DUer posted this tonight:: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Waukesha county uses Opscans... who remebers any more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Apparently they ran out of paper ballots for the Opti-scan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeelingBlue (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
24. Which is why the votes should be tossed, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Good resolve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
50. Yep, call for another election. Don't let the repigs steal this one. Make 'em do it all in daylight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bound by Honor (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
29. I would ask to bring in the VV heavyweights in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bound by Honor (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Waukesha County votes should be completely rejected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. This is no reason to disenfranchise voters of an entire county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
31. It also gave her a chance to forget about it until the Democrat won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
32. I'm not inclined to be paranoid, but WHY does this never happen with the Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaDeacon (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. That's what I've been saying!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. They're rotten to the core. Notice that none of these lost and found votes EVER favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:52 AM Response to Reply #41 |
56. NEVER! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
42. Is the the Ghost of Katherine Harris, rearing her ugly head? After all, her name is Katherine. ~nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
43. Sing Along! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nictuku (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
45. Access Databases ... Don't have to be 'Saved' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elbram (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
102. IT person here. Yes and No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
46. In most places employees are not allowed to take public records home; and I suggest she had help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
52. She already committed criminal acts, why does she have a job again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
54. Hmmm, ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
55. Sorry, I just know something is fishy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 05:04 AM Response to Original message |
57. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spicegal (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 05:23 AM Response to Original message |
58. I listened to this woman's comments, and have to tell ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldhippydude (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:02 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roxiejules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Rose Mary Woods: On How Nixon's Watergate Tape was Destroyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
60. Lemme guess, it's an Excel Spreadsheet....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nictuku (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #60 |
85. No, she said Microsoft Access |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #85 |
94. Just heard on the Stephanie Miller show that there is one account for that machine that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayrow (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
61. Seriously! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harriety (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
64. It's Not About Voter Fraud, It's About Election Fraud (typicial Repub style) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnowCritter (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
67. Republicans claim that government doesn't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcaudilllg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:33 AM Response to Reply #67 |
79. Scientifically verifiable +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
70. Wow - Wisconsin is ground zero in exposing all the the Repub dirty tricks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:42 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. They are just so uncharacterisctially BAD at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpbrown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
71. She clearly manufactured this vote count, and should go to prison for voter fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcaudilllg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #71 |
76. I agree. Either that, or throw the votes OUT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #71 |
110. Found during canvassing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
77. I'd check her bank account for any recent large deposits - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
80. People who tamper with the will of the people should get life... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
81. I hope she gets caught and goes to jail. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #81 |
111. Doesn't seem to be anything to get caught for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
86. Wow, just remember that *this was a year ago*. If you don't smell it, get your nose checked. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
89. Remember all of this in 2012, when the Presidential Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bergie321 (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
92. This is unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #92 |
112. It wasn't stolen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
97. without the ability of someone unauthorized to be involved, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #97 |
113. How about the city being discussed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
98. The votes were not found on state-owned voting equipment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. yes this wasn't a Soduko game or even close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #105 |
115. Nonrecountable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. none of the other elections have a result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. then you'd have to take that up with the Brookfield election officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SnakeEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #98 |
114. The votes were not found on her laptop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214 (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
106. Her next job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdadd (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
107. "Without the ability of someone unauthorized to be involved," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC