|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:57 PM Original message |
Boy it's a good thing those votes came out in favor of Prosser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not half the people in Wisconsin. Half the voters after a campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Which tells me what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Either way, half the voting public in Wisconsin think Walker is right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Maybe, Maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. They are not black boxes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. The machines that count those votes are computers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. This particular issue has nothing to do with machines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Secret vote counting is what allows these @ssholes to screw with vote totals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Even a close win was a disappointment for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. No, it's worse than you think.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Oh, please. She 'forgot' to 'save' her 'Access database'? Give me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. She didn't report the totals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. What you call 'incompetence' I call 'possible fraud'. I'm relying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frank Cannon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Hell, anyone who's even USED Access knows what blatant horseshit this is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. And You Seem To trust That The Belatedly Produced Totals Are Accurate As Stated, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. It's not that I trust them, I have no doubt they'd steal the election if they could... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. Election fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. They didn't have the turnout for this to be remotely possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. It could have been done by remote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. I was told they had paper ballots... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. The tallys are done by computer, therefore, they are accessible to fraud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC