Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bravo people of Iceland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:05 AM
Original message
Bravo people of Iceland
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13022524
<snip>
Icelanders have rejected the latest plan to repay the UK and Netherlands some 4bn euros lost when the country's banking system collapsed in 2008.

Partial referendum results show 58% voting no, and 42% supporting the plan.

Johanna Sigurdardottir, Iceland's Prime Minister, said the rejection meant "the worst option was chosen".

UK Treasury minister Danny Alexander said the decision was "disappointing" and the matter would go to an international court.


-----------------------------------------
Make the fucking banks and their cronies pay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. And yet, after they vote no," the matter would go to an international court."
Ireland is being taken over by the banks now, losing their sovereign wealth.

Ours is gone, but few people have really grasped the fact yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Markets,corporations and the international political class
matter way more than citizens.
If we lose our money when Ponzi schemes fail, why on earth shouldn't the irresponsible morons who invested people's pension funds in Icelandic banks not be thrown in prison? Why should the poor citizens of Iceland pay for the folly of the robber barons?

It's the same shit everywhere. We are all paying to prop up the corrupt thieves while they refuse to even pay taxes. What a fugging planet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. 'The banks' in this case are now owned by the Icelandic taxpayers
If you want them to pay, then the Icelandic taxpayer will pay. The alternative, which is what has happened so far, is that the British and Dutch taxpayers pay - who already paid the €20,000 or so to each depositor (the Icelandic government already paid it to Icelandic depositors, but didn't to foreign obnes), which is what this is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I don't see why the citizens of Iceland should pay for the
folly of bankers, politicians and paper speculators. Those 'overseas' who put overseas citizens in financial jeopardy should pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Because it was an established part of banking regulation to guarantee the first part of the deposits
and the Icelandic government said, before the banks went bust, that it was able to cover the guarantee.

3 August 2008

Jonas Thordarson, executive manager at the Icelandic compensation body, which operates out of the small offices of Iceland's central bank, says there is no reason for UK savers to fear that they would have to wait a long time to get back their money.

'It is the law that we must repay depositors within three months,' says Thordarson. 'Our fund is supervised by the Icelandic financial services authority and backed by the Icelandic Government. UK savers have no need to worry that the claiming process would not be completely straightforward and fast.'

Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/article.html?in_article_id=448883&in_page_id=7#ixzz1J7dmxFBJ


and confirmed it was its responsibility shortly after:

The Government of Iceland underlines that deposits in domestic commercial and savings banks and their branches in Iceland will be fully covered. "Deposit" refers to all deposits by general customers and companies which are covered by the Deposit Division of the Depositors’ and Investors’ Guarantee Fund.

Reykjavik, 6 October 2008

http://eng.forsaetisraduneyti.is/news-and-articles/nr/3033


(ie there is not a distinction between deposits by domestic and foreign customers; if it was an Icelandic bank, then it was covered).

Posted on 16 November 2008

PRESS RELEASE FROM Ministry for Foreign Affairs

According to the agreed guidelines, the government of Iceland will cover deposits of insured depositors in the Icesave accounts in accordance with EEA law

Read more: http://www.icenews.is/index.php/2008/11/16/icesave-agreed-guidelines-reached-on-deposit-guarantees/#ixzz1J7c7LA8Z


The 'financial jeopardy' was from believing the Icelandic authorities' claims that they were able to cover the €20,000 deposit guarantee. The jeopardy came from Iceland.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why would so called rational people believe that?
Thanks for the links.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why would they believe governments when they say they guarantee the smaller deposits?
Well, because governments had kept their word on it in the past. For instance, the American government guaranteed up to $250,000 of deposits, even under George Bush. Wouldn't you have trusted the Icelandic government more readily than Bush? When the guarantee is for only about a tenth of the size of the American one?

I see Jamaica has a similar scheme, covering about €5000 per depositor, if I've got the exchange rate right. Is it irrational to believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. In the context of deregulation or government regulators cozying up to the
banks/corporations, I don't trust any of them. After all when they crash said governments will impose draconian policies on the majority of their weakest citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. These refer to deposits, yes. There's no mention of interest though.
If the taxpayers have to pay the depositors, they should in their turn be able to claim repayment from those who grew wealthy punting this scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree the interest is not covered, and should probably be less
The first time the voters rejected this, the interest was going to be about 5.5%pa, which definitely seemed too much. This proposal was 3 or 3.5%, I think, which is still fairly high for loans to governments. I think there would be a good argument for it either being the British/Euro base rate (0.5% for the former at the moment), or no interest at all.

Whoever does pay will get the assets of the old bank that were set aside for this, which should cover much (but unlikely to be all) of the bill; but saying who grew wealthy from the 'scam' is more problematic. This 'scam' was just Icelandic banks raising money by paying the top market rate to depositors. They then leant rather recklessly to Icelandic speculators who, it turned out, couldn't repay the loans (hence there being some assets which aren't enough to cover all the deposits). The shareholders of the banks in their former form have, I'm pretty sure, lost all the value of the shares they held. I expect the speculators have managed to hold on to some of the money they 'made' when things were going OK for them, but it would be nice to see it recovered from them somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jmaxfie1 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Iceland...Black Metal province. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. The citizens of Iceland know they didn't break it. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC