Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

oops, i did it again...Liberal Hypocrisy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:03 PM
Original message
oops, i did it again...Liberal Hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which liberals are happy with Obama and war?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, I can't say for sure if they're liberals or not
But there are any number of folks posting right here at DU who think the policies of the Obama administration, including foreign policy and conduct of the ongoing occupations of other countries are just fine and dandy. I don't advise asking them for the reasons for their support, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The "reasons" usually turn out to be along the lines of
"I TRUST HIM WHY DON'T YOU?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just because the differences are not apparent does not mean that there are none.
Believe me, I am a skeptic too, but my allegiance to truth compels me to cite the logical inconsistencies of this meta-category of opposition.

That said, it is also true that though there may be differences that are not apparent, it is also not apparent, from our perspective at this time, whether those differences are essentially significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. whaa ??
"That said, it is also true that though there may be differences that are not apparent, it is also not apparent, from our perspective at this time, whether those differences are essentially significant"

That sounds like a sentence Palin might come up with ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. People around here talk like they know everything they need to know in order to arrive at whatever
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 12:53 PM by patrice
conclusion they are pedaling to the rest of us. They do not.

However . . .

Even if they did know everything they would need to know in order to decide __________________ , that does not mean that missing information, whatever it is, is necessarily significant to the outcome of the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "That sounds like . . ." Could that have anything to do with you? ... even in the slightest degree?
When I think something like that about what someone is saying, I check my own deficiencies, first, before making accusations of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. This category of criticism is the same as saying, "Tom looks like Joe. He is the same height, same
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 12:15 PM by patrice
color of hair, same color of eyes, weighs about the same, is about the same age, dresses in the same style, likes the same sports, has similar hobbies, ergo Tom IS Joe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ahhhhh Obama didn't lie us into invading a country by using fear and revenge speak
nor did Obama declare mission accomplished when it wasn't. Nor did Obama come up with more lies to cover the fact that Saddam nor Iraq was involved with 9/11. Obama did not declare that, after 9/11 failure, Libya had WMD's and was ready to deploy them on US cities. Nor did Obama then declare that, after no WMD's were found in Iraq, he was going to give Libya American style freedom, you know Iraqis are now free to decide their destiny and those who don't agree with my ideal of freedom are terrorists so they have to die, after all we are fighting them over there so we aren't fighting them here.

Funny how wing nuts can't remember any of those things when they try to compare D presidents to R presidents on policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC