Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radiation risks from Fukushima 'no longer negligible' - in Europe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:32 PM
Original message
Radiation risks from Fukushima 'no longer negligible' - in Europe

French source:

"The document, published on 7 April, advises against consuming rainwater and says vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant or breastfeeding women should avoid consuming vegetables with large leaves, fresh milk and creamy cheese."

"Data for the west coast of the United States, which received the Fukushima radioactive fallout 6-10 days before France, reveals that levels of radioactive iodine-131 concentration are 8-10 times higher there, the institute says."


http://www.euractiv.com/en/health/radiation-risks-fukushima-longer-negligible-news-503947
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like the 'must have' kitchen gadget for 2011 will be a geiger counter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdking647 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. considering i-131 has a 1/2 life of 8 days
i doubt the report. find me a report from a non biased group without an anti nuclear agenda.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. 8 days halflife means that after 16 days you still have a 1/4 left. It does not take
much longer for it to get to Europe and fall on the grass. The cows, goats eat it and voila.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yawnmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. is this peer reviewed? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Did you read the article? It's not a scientific paper. It is a news report. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. But, but, but eating coal would be worse or something.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC