Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TEPCO's new estimate on how much radioactivity was released from Japanese plants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:31 PM
Original message
TEPCO's new estimate on how much radioactivity was released from Japanese plants
TEPCO is the Japanese power company running the nuke plants and managing the disaster. They have released numbers estimating the amount of radioactive iodine in all 6 reactor buildings at the time of disaster and how much of that has been released.


Tokyo Electric Power Company estimates that about one percent of the radioactive iodine at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has been released since the March 11th earthquake and tsunami damaged the facility.

The company on Tuesday announced the estimated radioactivity levels of all substances at the plant's 6 reactors and fuel storage pools at the time of the disaster.

The estimates are classified under radioactive noble gases, iodine or other materials.

81 million tera-becquerels of iodine-131 are believed to have existed at the plant.


http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/13_03.html

So do the quick math, 1 percent of 81 million tera-becquerels will be: 810,000 tera-becquerels. BUT...earlier in the day the nuclear agency safety office in Japan had said the following:

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said earlier in the day that 130,000 tera-becquerels of iodine-131 have been released so far.


Conclusion: TEPCO has a figure 8 times the number that the Nuclear safety office had released earlier in the day. This is rather interesting since TEPCO also said on Tuesday that the leak in Fukushima plants may be bigger than Chernobyl.

Either TEPCO's numbers are way off or we have an accident on par or even worse than Chernobyl on our hands.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh, I would say
go with the latter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reminds me of BP's estimates, always low until they were forced to move up by the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. This does not inspire confidence in an industry with little room for error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nor does the other info in the article

The company also says that, provided no leak occurred, the level of iodine-131 at the plant had fallen to less than one-hundredth of the pre-disaster level as of Monday.


What does that mean? That they are stil unsure whether a "leak" occurred or not and that maybe -- if it has not occurred -- that the level fallen (and that sounds more like conjecture than measurement).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:54 PM
Original message
k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Doomsayers, all of you.
Just think how much worse this might be if we didn't know that nuclear power is entirely safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is TEPCO saying that's what *existed* but not necessarily what has been *released* ??
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 06:10 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
"the estimated radioactivity levels of all substances at the plant's 6 reactors and fuel storage pools at the time of the disaster."

Such a statement does not seem to indicate that it the amount released to the environment (yet). It would also seem to include the radionuclides that are present in reactors 5 and 6 - which were in cold shutdown and not posing any threat.

"The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said earlier in the day that 130,000 tera-becquerels of iodine-131 have been released so far."

This statement solidly indicates an amount that has been released into the environment.

Technically, as stated, both statements could be truthful and correct.
It's just a matter how much has leaked and much remains in the reactor buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The article says that one percent of the Iodine present in all buildings has been released
Did the math and it came to 810,000 Terabecequerels. 8 times the estimate of Japans nuclear safety agency earlier in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Gotcha, I thought you compared the numbers directly.
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 06:24 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
You're right. But keep in mind, becquerels are ALWAYS changing with time.

For example, in terms of becquerels, every 8 days I-131 loses HALF of it's becquerels.
Perhaps that accounts for the drastic difference in numbers.
TEPCO's numbers were at the time of the disaster. NISA's numbers were put out earlier today.
That's a long time for short lived isotopes to disintegrate, leaving MUCH fewer becquerels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC